Global patterns of fragmentation and connectivity of mammalian carnivore habitat

Although mammalian carnivores are vulnerable to habitat fragmentation and require landscape connectivity, their global patterns of fragmentation and connectivity have not been examined. We use recently developed high-resolution habitat suitability models to conduct comparative analyses and to identify global hotspots of fragmentation and connectivity for the world's terrestrial carnivores. Species with less fragmentation (i.e. more interior high-quality habitat) had larger geographical ranges, a greater proportion of habitat within their range, greater habitat connectivity and a lower risk of extinction. Species with higher connectivity (i.e. less habitat isolation) also had a greater proportion of high-quality habitat, but had smaller, not larger, ranges, probably reflecting shorter distances between habitat patches for species with restricted distributions; such species were also more threatened, as would be expected given the negative relationship between range size and extinction risk. Fragmentation and connectivity did not differ among Carnivora families, and body mass was associated with connectivity but not fragmentation. On average, only 54.3 per cent of a species' geographical range comprised high-quality habitat, and more troubling, only 5.2 per cent of the range comprised such habitat within protected areas. Identification of global hotspots of fragmentation and connectivity will help guide strategic priorities for carnivore conservation.

[1]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Space versus phylogeny: disentangling phylogenetic and spatial signals in comparative data , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Network analysis to assess landscape connectivity trends: application to European forests (1990–2000) , 2011 .

[3]  R. Baker,et al.  Squirrels: the animal answer guide , 2007 .

[4]  Piero Visconti,et al.  Future hotspots of terrestrial mammal loss , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity , 2004, Nature.

[7]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  Quantifying Landscape Spatial Pattern: What Is the State of the Art? , 1998, Ecosystems.

[8]  E. Paradis,et al.  Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Paul C. Paquet,et al.  Conservation Biology and Carnivore Conservation in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[10]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin , 2006, Nature.

[12]  M. Kennedy Trophic Cascades: Predators, Prey and the Changing Dynamics of Nature , 2012 .

[13]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Predicting extinction risk in declining species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  M. Knutson,et al.  EVALUATION OF SPATIAL MODELS TO PREDICT VULNERABILITY OF FOREST BIRDS TO BROOD PARASITISM BY COWBIRDS , 2002 .

[15]  Christopher N. Johnson,et al.  Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Jochen A. G. Jaeger,et al.  Comment on "Roadless Space of the Conterminous United States" , 2007, Science.

[17]  D. Bal,et al.  AS WE SEE IT Harmonization of Red Lists in Europe: some lessons learned in the Netherlands when applying the new IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1. , 2007 .

[18]  R. Kays,et al.  Walker's carnivores of the world , 2005 .

[19]  Jennifer Sills,et al.  Corrections and clarifications , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  J. Hilty Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation , 2006 .

[21]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  The predictability of extinction: biological and external correlates of decline in mammals , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  The Status of the World's Land and Marine Mammals: Diversity, Threat, and Knowledge , 2008, Science.

[23]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks , 2006 .

[24]  C. Dickman,et al.  Keystone effects of an alien top-predator stem extinctions of native mammals , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  K. Gaston,et al.  The sizes of species’ geographic ranges , 2009 .

[26]  D. Tittensor,et al.  Global habitat suitability of cold‐water octocorals , 2012 .

[27]  P. Beier,et al.  Do Habitat Corridors Provide Connectivity? , 1998 .

[28]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[29]  A. Grafen The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  Jorge Soberón,et al.  Global Mammal Conservation: What Must We Manage? , 2005, Science.

[31]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[32]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Reconciling global mammal prioritization schemes into a strategy , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  A. Bennett Linkages in the Landscape: The Role Of Corridors And Connectivity In Wildlife Conservation , 1999 .

[34]  Jochen A. G. Jaeger,et al.  Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA , 2008 .

[35]  K. Crooks Relative Sensitivities of Mammalian Carnivores to Habitat Fragmentation , 2002 .

[36]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[37]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  Research frontiers in null model analysis , 2001 .

[38]  Piero Visconti,et al.  Global habitat suitability models of terrestrial mammals , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  T. Spies,et al.  Measuring forest landscape patterns in the cascade range of Oregon, USA , 1991 .

[40]  A. D. Gregorio,et al.  Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual , 2000 .

[41]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .

[42]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species , 2005, Science.

[43]  C. Norwood Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in wildlife Conservation , 1999 .

[44]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[45]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations , 2008, Bioinform..

[46]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Let the locals lead , 2009, Nature.

[47]  J. Emlen,et al.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES , 2008 .

[48]  E. Paradis Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R , 2006 .

[49]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning : Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study , 2007 .

[50]  M. Pagel Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.

[51]  C. Loehle,et al.  Effects of parcelization and land divestiture on forest sustainability in simulated forest landscapes , 2006 .

[52]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Human Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World's Carnivores , 2004, PLoS biology.

[53]  Carsten Rahbek,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect and Species Richness Patterns:What Have We Learned So Far? , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[54]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Ecological Meltdown in Predator-Free Forest Fragments , 2001, Science.

[55]  Daryl E. Wilson,et al.  Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference , 1993 .

[56]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: big is bad, but only in the tropics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[57]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  PanTHERIA: a species‐level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals , 2009 .

[58]  E. Deevey,et al.  The human population. , 1960, Scientific American.

[59]  Eliot A. Cohen,et al.  National Imagery and Mapping Agency , 2001 .

[60]  J. Ginsberg,et al.  Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas , 1998, Science.

[61]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Quantifying connectivity: balancing metric performance with data requirements , 2006 .

[62]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[63]  William F. Laurance,et al.  The Future of the Brazilian Amazon , 2001, Science.

[64]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[65]  M. Soons Habitat fragmentation and connectivity : Spatial and temporal characteristics of the colonization process in plants , 2003 .

[66]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  The delayed rise of present-day mammals , 1990, Nature.

[67]  Carsten Rahbek,et al.  Predicting continental-scale patterns of bird species richness with spatially explicit models , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[68]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat , 2005, Nature.