Distinct Frontoparietal Networks Set the Stage for Later Perceptual Identification Priming and Episodic Recognition Memory

Recent imaging evidence suggests that a network of brain regions including the medial temporal lobe, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and dorsal posterior parietal cortex supports the successful encoding of long-term memories. Other areas, like the ventral posterior parietal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, have been associated with encoding failure rather than success. In line with the transfer-appropriate processing view, we hypothesized that distinct neural networks predict successful encoding depending on whether the later memory test draws primarily on perceptual or conceptual memory representations. Following an encoding phase, memory was assessed in a combined incidental perceptual identification and intentional recognition memory test. We found that during encoding, activation in ventral posterior parietal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicted successful perceptual identification priming, whereas activation in ventrolateral prefrontal and dorsal posterior parietal cortex predicted successful recognition memory. Extending recent theories of attention to memory, the results suggest that ventral parietal regions support stimulus-driven attention to perceptual item features, forming memories accessed by later perceptual memory tests, whereas dorsal parietal regions support attention to meaningful item features, forming memories accessed by later conceptual memory tests.

[1]  Jennifer Sills,et al.  Corrections and clarifications , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  M. Petrides Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Accurate forced-choice recognition without awareness of memory retrieval. , 2008, Learning & memory.

[4]  R. Henson,et al.  State-related and item-related neural correlates of successful memory encoding , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Rugg,et al.  When more means less neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding , 2001, Current Biology.

[6]  M. Rugg,et al.  Task-dependency of the neural correlates of episodic encoding as measured by fMRI. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[8]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  The hippocampus as a "stupid," domain-specific module: Implications for theories of recent and remote memory, and of imagination. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[10]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans? , 2002, Hippocampus.

[11]  T. Blaxton Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. , 1989 .

[12]  E. Stein,et al.  Cingulate activation increases dynamically with response speed under stimulus unpredictability. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Peter Graf,et al.  Implicit Memory: It Is Prime Time@@@Implicit Memory: New Directions in Cognition, Development, and Neuropsychology , 1995 .

[14]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Richardson-Klavehn,et al.  Remembering and knowing , 2000 .

[16]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Neural Manifestations of Memory with and without Awareness , 2003, Neuron.

[17]  C. Frith,et al.  Comment on "Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought" , 2007, Science.

[18]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: The dual attentional processes hypothesis , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Charan Ranganath,et al.  Prefrontal Cortex and Long-Term Memory Encoding: An Integrative Review of Findings from Neuropsychology and Neuroimaging , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[20]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Neocortical Connectivity during Episodic Memory Formation , 2006, PLoS biology.

[21]  Deborah E. Hannula,et al.  The Eyes Have It: Hippocampal Activity Predicts Expression of Memory in Eye Movements , 2009, Neuron.

[22]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-down modulation of early sensory cortex , 1996, NeuroImage.

[23]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[24]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Medial Temporal Lobe Activity Associated with Active Maintenance of Novel Information , 2001, Neuron.

[25]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: A hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  R. Bjork,et al.  Intention and awareness in perceptual identification priming , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Brain substrates of implicit and explicit memory: The importance of concurrently acquired neural signals of both memory types , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: Insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[29]  Yael Shrager,et al.  Activity in Both Hippocampus and Perirhinal Cortex Predicts the Memory Strength of Subsequently Remembered Information , 2008, Neuron.

[30]  T. Rauchfuss Erratum: A promising mimic of hydrogenase activity (Science (553)) , 2007 .

[31]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Establishing a relationship between activity reduction in human perirhinal cortex and priming , 2009, Hippocampus.

[32]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-down modulation of early sensory cortex. , 1997 .

[33]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[34]  L D Williams,et al.  The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Neuroanatomical Dissociation of Encoding Processes Related to Priming and Explicit Memory , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  J M Gardiner,et al.  Involuntary conscious memory and the method of opposition. , 1994, Memory.

[37]  D. Pandya,et al.  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis in the human and the macaque brain and corticocortical connection patterns , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[39]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Redefining implicit and explicit memory: the functional neuroanatomy of priming, remembering, and control of retrieval. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Assembling and encoding word representations: fMRI subsequent memory effects implicate a role for phonological control , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  R N Henson,et al.  Depth of processing effects on neural correlates of memory encoding: relationship between findings from across- and within-task comparisons. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  Sabrina M. Tom,et al.  Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Zara M. Bergström,et al.  On the intimate relationship between neurobiology and function in the theoretical analysis of human learning and memory , 2009 .

[44]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Differential Encoding Mechanisms for Subsequent Associative Recognition and Free Recall , 2012 .

[46]  C. Weiller,et al.  Structural connectivity for visuospatial attention: significance of ventral pathways. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[48]  J M Gardiner,et al.  Depth-of-processing effects on priming in stem completion: tests of the voluntary-contamination, conceptual-processing, and lexical-processing hypotheses. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  H. Roediger Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[51]  D. Kumaran,et al.  Novelty signals: a window into hippocampal information processing , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  L. Jacoby Remembering the data: analyzing interactive processes in reading , 1983 .

[53]  C. Grady,et al.  Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: Meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  S. M. Daselaar,et al.  When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[55]  L. Cooper,et al.  Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  L R Squire,et al.  On the contribution of perceptual fluency and priming to recognition memory , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.