Adaptation of Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Methods for Automatic Visual Evaluation of the Surface Quality of 3D Prints

Automatic visual quality assessment of the 3D printed surfaces is currently one of the most demanding challenges in additive manufacturing. Regardless of the applications of the computer vision for the 3D printing process monitoring purposes, a reliable surface quality evaluation during manufacturing may introduce brand new possibilities. The detection of some distortions and their automatic evaluation can be helpful when deciding to stop the process to save time, energy, and filament. In some cases, some further corrections can also be made for relatively small distortions. Since many general-purpose image quality assessment methods have been proposed in recent years, their applications for the quality evaluation in the additive manufacturing are investigated. As most of the metrics are full-reference and require the availability of the original perfect quality image, their direct application is not possible. Therefore, their adaptation is described in the paper together with experimental verification of classification results obtained using various metrics.

[1]  Vedang Chauhan,et al.  Fault detection and classification in automated assembly machines using machine vision , 2017 .

[2]  Krzysztof Okarma,et al.  Combined image similarity index , 2012 .

[3]  Chi K. Tse,et al.  An ACO-Based Tool-Path Optimizer for 3-D Printing Applications , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[4]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Initial Work on the Characterization of Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) Using Software Image Analysis , 2015 .

[5]  Chao-Ming Huang,et al.  Integration of 3D Printing and Industry 4.0 into Engineering Teaching , 2018, Sustainability.

[6]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Azadeh Mansouri,et al.  Image quality assessment using the singular value decomposition theorem , 2009 .

[8]  Krzysztof Okarma,et al.  Application of Structural Similarity Based Metrics for Quality Assessment of 3D Prints , 2016, ICCVG.

[9]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Vision-Based Online Process Control in Manufacturing Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[12]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  In situ real time defect detection of 3D printed parts , 2017 .

[13]  Shing I. Chang,et al.  Automated Process Monitoring in 3D Printing Using Supervised Machine Learning , 2018 .

[14]  F. Piller,et al.  Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: A Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030 , 2017 .

[15]  Igor I. Bezukladnikov,et al.  Development of visual inspection systems for 3D printing , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus).

[16]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[17]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  Wojciech Matusik,et al.  MultiFab , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[19]  Chun-Ling Yang,et al.  Gradient-Based Structural Similarity for Image Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.