Lessons learned using an MRI-only workflow during high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE We report clinical observations of a technique using an MRI-only workflow for catheter insertion and treatment planning in patients receiving standard-care high-dose-rate brachytherapy before external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were enrolled on a prospective clinical trial approved by our institution's research ethics board. Multiparametric MRI with stereotactic navigation was used to guide insertion of brachytherapy catheters, followed by MRI-based treatment planning. RESULTS Sixty-two implants were performed. Median catheter insertion + imaging time was 100 minutes, and overall anesthesia time was 4.0 hours (range, 2.1-6.9 hours). MRI at the time of brachytherapy restaged 14 patients (35%) who were found to have a higher stage of disease. In 6 patients, this translated in directed insertion of brachytherapy catheters outside the prostate boundary (extracapsular disease [n = 2] or seminal vesicle invasion [n = 4]). Most patients (80%) had gross tumor visible on MRI, which influenced catheter insertion and treatment planning. MRI depicted postimplant anatomic boundaries clearly, with the exception of the apical prostate which was blurred by trauma after catheter insertion. Conventional dose-planning objectives for the rectum (V75 < 1.0 cc) were difficult to achieve, but toxicities were low (acute grade ≥ 2 genitourinary = 20%, late grade ≥ 2 genitourinary = 15%, and late grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal = 7%). Urethral trauma visualized on MRI led to two transient Grade 3 events. CONCLUSIONS Despite a standard-care approach, MRI acquired throughout the procedure altered catheter insertion and dose-planning strategies. An MRI-only workflow is feasible but must be streamlined for broader acceptance.

[1]  Ming Xu,et al.  Towards Personalized Statistical Deformable Model and Hybrid Point Matching for Robust MR-TRUS Registration , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  J. Bernhard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients. , 2015, European urology.

[3]  Deidre Batchelar,et al.  A phantom study to assess accuracy of needle identification in real-time planning of ultrasound-guided high-dose-rate prostate implants. , 2013, Brachytherapy.

[4]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Deidre Batchelar,et al.  Ultrasound-CT fusion compared with MR-CT fusion for postimplant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 2013, Brachytherapy.

[6]  Morikatsu Wada,et al.  MRI scans significantly change target coverage decisions in radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer , 2014, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[7]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  The emerging role of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer , 2013, Journal of radiation research.

[8]  D. Margolis,et al.  PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. , 2016, European urology.

[9]  A. Evans,et al.  MR-guided prostate biopsy for planning of focal salvage after radiation therapy. , 2015, Radiology.

[10]  H. Hricak,et al.  Pretreatment endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging findings predict biochemical tumor control in prostate cancer patients treated with combination brachytherapy and external-beam radiotherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[12]  M. Zelefsky,et al.  Point: There is a need for supplemental XRT with brachytherapy in the treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. , 2013, Brachytherapy.

[13]  S J Damore,et al.  Needle displacement during HDR brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  A. Fiorentino,et al.  In regard to Miralbell et al. Re: Dose-fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: alpha/beta=1.4 (0.9-2.2) Gy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  G. S. Gustafson,et al.  The Role of Needle Trauma in the Development of Urinary Toxicity Following Prostate High Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy , 2007 .

[16]  M. Kattan,et al.  Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms. , 2006, Radiology.

[17]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy in standard 1.5T scanner. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Paul Schellhammer,et al.  Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  J. Pouliot,et al.  American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. , 2012, Brachytherapy.

[20]  Oguz Akin,et al.  Imaging prostate cancer , 2002 .

[21]  Liying Zhang,et al.  Is single fraction 15 Gy the preferred high dose-rate brachytherapy boost dose for prostate cancer? , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  M. Zelefsky,et al.  How to select the optimal therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. , 2012, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[23]  J. Montie,et al.  Functional anatomy of the prostate: implications for treatment planning. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  J. Witjes,et al.  Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. , 2015, European urology.

[25]  F. Foroudi,et al.  Urethral stricture following high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  Amita Shukla-Dave,et al.  Predicting post-external beam radiation therapy PSA relapse of prostate cancer using pretreatment MRI. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. , 2016, European urology.

[28]  J. Hendry,et al.  Dose-fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5,969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9-2.2) Gy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Deidre Batchelar,et al.  Validation study of ultrasound-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning compared with CT-based planning. , 2014, Brachytherapy.

[30]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Phase II trial of combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: preliminary results of RTOG 0321. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Dosimetric analysis of radiation therapy oncology group 0321: the importance of urethral dose. , 2014, Practical radiation oncology.

[32]  Mary Feng,et al.  Radiographic and anatomic basis for prostate contouring errors and methods to improve prostate contouring accuracy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  M. Ranney,et al.  Beyond the bedside: Clinicians as guardians of public health, medicine and science , 2020, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

[34]  Kemal Tuncali,et al.  Transperineal in-bore 3-T MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective clinical observational study. , 2015, Radiology.