The Angular Interval between the Direction of Progression and Body Orientation in Normal, Alcohol- and Cocaine Treated Fruit Flies

In this study we characterize the coordination between the direction a fruit-fly walks and the direction it faces, as well as offer a methodology for isolating and validating key variables with which we phenotype fly locomotor behavior. Our fundamental finding is that the angular interval between the direction a fly walks and the direction it faces is actively managed in intact animals and modulated in a patterned way with drugs. This interval is small in intact flies, larger with alcohol and much larger with cocaine. The dynamics of this interval generates six coordinative modes that flow smoothly into each other. Under alcohol and much more so under cocaine, straight path modes dwindle and modes involving rotation proliferate. To obtain these results we perform high content analysis of video-tracked open field locomotor behavior. Presently there is a gap between the quality of descriptions of insect behaviors that unfold in circumscribed situations, and descriptions that unfold in extended time and space. While the first describe the coordination between low-level kinematic variables, the second quantify cumulative measures and subjectively defined behavior patterns. Here we reduce this gap by phenotyping extended locomotor behavior in terms of the coordination between low-level kinematic variables, which we quantify, combining into a single field two disparate fields, that of high content phenotyping and that of locomotor coordination. This will allow the study of the genes/brain/locomotor coordination interface in genetically engineered and pharmacologically manipulated animal models of human diseases.

[1]  Greg Stephens,et al.  C. elegans tracking and behavioral measurement. , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[2]  Alex Gomez-Marin,et al.  Active sensation during orientation behavior in the Drosophila larva: more sense than luck , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  R. Olberg,et al.  Visual control of prey-capture flight in dragonflies , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  Benjamin Soibam,et al.  Open-field arena boundary is a primary object of exploration for Drosophila , 2012, Brain and behavior.

[5]  O. Stiedl,et al.  Finding the right motivation: Genotype-dependent differences in effective reinforcements for spatial learning , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  W. Bialek,et al.  Emergence of long timescales and stereotyped behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Quantifying the buildup in extent and complexity of free exploration in mice , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  Ten ways to improve the quality of descriptions of whole-animal movement , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  Michael B. Reiser,et al.  Drosophila fly straight by fixating objects in the face of expanding optic flow , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Brian J. Duistermars,et al.  Mechanisms of Odor-Tracking: Multiple Sensors for Enhanced Perception and Behavior , 2010, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[11]  Greg J. Stephens,et al.  From Modes to Movement in the Behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  Freedom of movement and the stability of its unfolding in free exploration of mice , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Pietro Perona,et al.  High-throughput Ethomics in Large Groups of Drosophila , 2009, Nature Methods.

[14]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Automated monitoring and analysis of social behavior in Drosophila , 2009, Nature Methods.

[15]  Jean-René Martin,et al.  Mutations Affecting the cAMP Transduction Pathway Disrupt the Centrophobism Behavior , 2009, Journal of neurogenetics.

[16]  P. Mitra,et al.  Analysis of the Trajectory of Drosophila melanogaster in a Circular Open Field Arena , 2007, PloS one.

[17]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Estimating wall guidance and attraction in mouse free locomotor behavior , 2007, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[18]  R. Ritzmann,et al.  10 Insect Walking: From Reduced Preparations to Natural Terrain , 2007 .

[19]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  Coordination of steering in a free-trotting quadruped , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  G. Elmer,et al.  Texture of locomotor path: a replicable characterization of a complex behavioral phenotype , 2005, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[21]  Jean-René Martin A portrait of locomotor behaviour in Drosophila determined by a video-tracking paradigm , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[22]  Martin P Paulus,et al.  The balance between approach and avoidance behaviors in a novel object exploration paradigm in mice , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  Anat Sakov,et al.  New replicable anxiety-related measures of wall vs center behavior of mice in the open field. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  Anat Sakov,et al.  The dynamics of spatial behavior: how can robust smoothing techniques help? , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  R. Strauss,et al.  Coordination of legs during straight walking and turning in Drosophila melanogaster , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  Jean-René Martin,et al.  Locomotor activity: a complex behavioural trait to unravel , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  U. Heberlein,et al.  Invertebrate models of drug abuse. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[28]  U. Heberlein,et al.  High-Resolution Analysis of Ethanol-Induced Locomotor Stimulation in Drosophila , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Strauss The central complex and the genetic dissection of locomotor behaviour , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  U. Heberlein,et al.  Drugs, flies, and videotape: the effects of ethanol and cocaine on Drosophila locomotion , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  A. J Spink,et al.  The EthoVision video tracking system—A tool for behavioral phenotyping of transgenic mice , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[32]  U. Heberlein,et al.  Functional Ethanol Tolerance in Drosophila , 2000, Neuron.

[33]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Abnormal turning behavior in Drosophila larvae. Identification and molecular analysis of scribbler (sbb). , 2000, Genetics.

[34]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  Statistical discrimination of natural modes of motion in rat exploratory behavior , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  U. Heberlein,et al.  Dopamine modulates acute responses to cocaine, nicotine and ethanol in Drosophila , 2000, Current Biology.

[36]  Thomas M. Morse,et al.  The Fundamental Role of Pirouettes in Caenorhabditis elegans Chemotaxis , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Hirsh,et al.  The trace amine tyramine is essential for sensitization to cocaine in Drosophila , 1999, Current Biology.

[38]  Neri Kafkafi,et al.  A traveling wave of lateral movement coordinates both turning and forward walking in the ferret , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  Jay Hirsh,et al.  Stereotypic behavioral responses to free-base cocaine and the development of behavioral sensitization in Drosophila , 1998, Current Biology.

[40]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[41]  Ilan Golani,et al.  The description of rat drug-induced behavior: Kinematics versus response categories , 1991, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[42]  D. Eilam,et al.  The ontogeny of exploratory behavior in the house rat (Rattus rattus): the mobility gradient. , 1988, Developmental psychobiology.

[43]  B. Burnet,et al.  A genetic analysis of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster , 1988, Heredity.

[44]  W. J. Bell Sources of information controlling motor patterns in arthropod local search orientation , 1985 .

[45]  G. Holton The new synthesis? , 1978 .

[46]  G. Holton Sociobiology: the new synthesis? , 1977, Newsletter on science, technology & human values.

[47]  K. Connolly Locomotor activity in Drosophila. 3. A distinction between activity and reactivity. , 1967, Animal behaviour.

[48]  A. Ewing Attempts to select for spontaneous activity in Drosophila melanogaster , 1963 .

[49]  H. Mittelstaedt Prey capture in Mantids , 1957 .