Humanitarian Space as Arena: A Perspective on the Everyday Politics of Aid

'Humanitarian space' denotes the physical or symbolic space which humanitarian agents need to deliver their services according to the principles they uphold. This concept, which separates humanitarian action from its politicized environment, is widely used in policy documents and academic texts, even though empirical evidence abounds that this space is in fact highly politicized. To some extent the uncritical use of the concept of humanitarian space is understandable because of its aspirational character. This article explores a different angle: how different actors use the concept and the language of humanitarian space and principles in the everyday politics of aid delivery. It proposes an empirical perspective that approaches humanitarian space from the perspective of everyday practices of policy and implementation. It maintains that the humanitarian space is an arena where a multitude of actors, including humanitarians and the disaster-affected recipients of aid, shape the everyday realities of humanitarian action. The paper develops this perspective for two humanitarian operations: a protracted refugee camp in Kakuma, Kenya, and the tsunami response in Sri Lanka.

[1]  Christopher Spearin.  Private security companies and humanitarians: A corporate solution to securing humanitarian spaces? , 2001 .

[2]  J. Stirrat.  Competitive humanitarianism: Relief and the tsunami in Sri Lanka , 2006 .

[3]  D. Hilhorst,et al.  The humanitarian arena in Angola, 1975-2008. , 2010, Disasters.

[4]  D. R. Dechaine.  Humanitarian Space and the Social Imaginary: Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders and the Rhetoric of Global Community , 2002 .

[5]  L. Minear.  The theory and practice of neutrality: Some thoughts on the tensions , 1999, Revue Internationale de la Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross.

[6]  Dorothea Hilhorst,et al.  Dead letter or living document? Ten years of the Code of Conduct for disaster relief. , 2005, Disasters.

[7]  E. Fulu.  Gender, Vulnerability, and the Experts: Responding to the Maldives Tsunami , 2007 .

[8]  M. Agier.  Between War and City , 2002 .

[9]  S. Turner.  Under the gaze of the ‘big nations’: Refugees, rumours and the international community in Tanzania , 2004 .

[10]  Peter Walker.  Cracking the code: the genesis, use and future of the Code of Conduct. , 2005, Disasters.

[11]  B. Jansen.  Between vulnerability and assertiveness: negotiating resettlement in Kakuma refugee camp, Kenya , 2008 .

[12]  S. Turner.  The Barriers of Innocence: humanitarian intervention and political imagination in a refugee camp for Burundians in Tanzania , 2001 .

[13]  Bart Klem,et al.  The gift of disaster: the commodification of good intentions in post-tsunami Sri Lanka. , 2010, Disasters.

[14]  Dorothea Hilhorst,et al.  Humanitarian principles and organisational culture: Everyday practice in Meédecins Sans Frontié res-Holland , 2002 .

[15]  O. Bakewell,et al.  Research Beyond the Categories: The Importance of Policy Irrelevant Research into Forced Migration , 2008 .

[16]  A. Waal.  The humanitarians' tragedy: escapable and inescapable cruelties , 2010 .

[17]  Gorm Rye Olsen,et al.  Humanitarian crises: what determines the level of emergency assistance? Media coverage, donor interests and the aid business. , 2003, Disasters.

[18]  M. Kleinfeld.  Misreading the Post-tsunami Political Landscape in Sri Lanka: The Myth of Humanitarian Space , 2007 .

[19]  Dunant's pyramid: thoughts on the “humanitarian space”* , 2007, International Review of the Red Cross.

[20]  D. Hilhorst,et al.  Everyday practices of humanitarian aid: tsunami response in Sri Lanka , 2006 .