Continuous spinal anesthesia: where do spinal catheters go?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of technical problems encountered when performing continuous spinal anesthesia and the influence of catheter tip position on block height following injection of a hypobaric spinal anesthetic. Twenty-nine elderly patients undergoing hip surgery were studied. Lumbar puncture was performed with an 18-gauge Tuohy needle at the L3-4 (or L2-3) interspace. Threading was defined as easy if a 20-gauge catheter was inserted on the first try, 3-4 cm cephalad. Threading was considered difficult if cephalad insertion of the catheter was impossible on the first try; the Tuohy needle was then rotated with its bevel facing caudally, the catheter inserted for 1-2 mm, and the needle turned back cephalad together with the catheter partially threaded, for further cephalad insertion up to 4 cm. All patients received 7.5 mg of hypobaric bupivacaine or tetracaine in the lateral decubitus position and sensory levels were determined by pinprick. After surgery all catheters were injected with radiographic dye and examined by radiograph for verification of position. The determination of the level of lumbar puncture was falsely judged in 59% of cases, the puncture being performed 1 or 2 spaces higher than assumed. Although threading difficulties were encountered in 4/28 cases, there was a 100% success rate in catheter insertion. One catheter displacement into the epidural space was noted. Twenty of twenty-eight catheters took a cephalad direction, 6 remained coiled in a horizontal position, and 2 took a caudal direction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  K. Drasner,et al.  Distribution of catheter-injected local anesthetic in a model of the subarachnoid space. , 1991, Anesthesiology.

[2]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Catheter spinal anesthesia and cauda equina syndrome: an alternative view. , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  J. Wildsmith,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a spinal catheter technique in femoro‐popliteal graft surgery , 1991, Anaesthesia.

[4]  D. Lambert,et al.  Cauda equina syndrome and continuous spinal anesthesia. , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  A. Forster,et al.  Comparison of Hypobaric, Hyperbaric, and Isobaric Solutions of Bupivacaine During Continuous Spinal Anesthesia , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Influence of the lumbar interspace chosen for injection on the spread of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  K. Drasner,et al.  Cauda Equina Syndrome After Continuous Spinal Anesthesia , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  F. Ievins Accuracy of placement of extradural needles in the L3-4 interspace: comparison of two methods of identifying L4. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  T. Taivainen,et al.  Spread of spinal anaesthesia with plain 0.5% bupivacaine: influence of the vertebral interspace used for injection. , 1989, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  A. Forster,et al.  Surgical Repair of Hip Fractures Using Continuous Spinal Anesthesia: Comparison of Hypobaric Solutions of Tetracaine and Bupivacaine , 1989, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  A. Forster,et al.  Comparison of continuous spinal and continuous epidural anaesthesia for lower limb surgery in elderly patients A retrospective study , 1989, Anaesthesia.

[12]  D. Moore,et al.  The position of plastic tubing in continuous-block techniques: an x-ray study of 552 patients. , 1968, Anesthesiology.

[13]  D. Lambert,et al.  Continuous spinal anesthesia with a microcatheter technique: preliminary experience. , 1990, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  R. Dripps A comparison of the malleable needle and catheter technics for continuous spinal anesthesia. , 1950, New York state journal of medicine.