Flow distribution during cardiopulmonary bypass in dependency on the outflow cannula positioning.

Oxygen deficiency in the right brain is a common problem during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This is linked to an insufficient perfusion of the carotid and vertebral artery. The flow to these vessels is strongly influenced by the outflow cannula position, which is traditionally located in the ascending aorta. Another approach however is to return blood via the right subclavian artery. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was performed for both methods and validated by particle image velocimetry (PIV). A 3-dimensional computer aided design model of the cardiovascular (CV) system was generated from realtime computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data. Mesh generation (CFD) and rapid prototyping (PIV) were used for the further model creation. The simulations were performed assuming usual CPB conditions, and the same boundary conditions were applied for the PIV validation. The flow distribution was analyzed for 55 cannula positions inside the aorta and in relation to the distance between the cannula tip and the vertebral artery branch for subclavian cannulation. The study reveals that the Venturi effect due to the cannula jet appears to be the main reason for the loss in cerebral perfusion seen clinically. It provides a PIV-validated CFD method of analyzing the flow distribution in the CV system and can be transferred to other applications.

[1]  F. Loop,et al.  Cerebral microembolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. Retinal microvascular studies in vivo with fluorescein angiography. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  H. Rusinek,et al.  Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  A. Galloway,et al.  Effect of cannula length on aortic arch flow: protection of the atheromatous aortic arch. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  T. Imaizumi,et al.  The effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile systemic perfusion on renal sympathetic nerve activity in anesthetized dogs. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  P. Hornick,et al.  Pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion: the continuing controversy. , 1997, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[6]  G. V. Van Nooten,et al.  Hydrodynamical Comparison of Aortic Arch Cannulae , 1998, The International journal of artificial organs.

[7]  K. Nakata,et al.  Cytokine and endothelial damage in pulsatile and nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[8]  A Undar,et al.  Pulsatile and nonpulsatile flows can be quantified in terms of energy equivalent pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass for direct comparisons. , 1999, ASAIO journal.

[9]  H. Sievers,et al.  Hydrodynamics of aortic arch vessels during perfusion through the right subclavian artery. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  W. White,et al.  Neurologic outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2003, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  H. Harasaki,et al.  Comparison of pulsatile and non‐pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass on regional renal blood flow in sheep , 2004, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.

[12]  P. Corso,et al.  The impact of aortic manipulation on neurologic outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery: a risk-adjusted study. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  H. Grocott,et al.  Aortic atheroma burden and cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  Barbara M. Johnston,et al.  Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  A. Undar,et al.  Comparison of pulsatile and non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2004, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[16]  Akif Undar,et al.  An Evaluation of the Benefits of Pulsatile versus Nonpulsatile Perfusion during Cardiopulmonary Bypass Procedures in Pediatric and Adult Cardiac Patients , 2006, ASAIO journal.

[17]  B. Meyns,et al.  230: Partial support for chronic heart failure with a subcutaneous pump , 2006 .

[18]  A. Ündar,et al.  Detection and Classification of Gaseous Microemboli During Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile Perfusion in a Simulated Neonatal CPB Model , 2007, ASAIO journal.

[19]  D. Burkhoff,et al.  Initial Clinical Experience with the Circulite Synergy™ Device for Partial Circulatory Support , 2008 .