Determination of quantum entanglement concurrence using multilayer perceptron neural networks.

Artificial Neural Networks, inspired by biological neural networks, have seen widespread implementations across all research areas in the past few years. This partly due to recent developments in the field and mostly due to the increased accessibility of hardware and cloud computing capable of realising artificial neural network models. As the implementation of neural networks and deep learning in general becomes more ubiquitous in everyday life, we seek to leverage this powerful tool to aid in furthering research in quantum information science. Concurrence is a measure of entanglement that quantifies the "amount" of entanglement contained within both pure and mixed state entangled systems [1]. In this thesis, artificial neural networks are used to determine models that predict concurrence, particularly, models are trained on mixed state inputs and used for pure state prediction. Conversely additional models are trained on pure state inputs and used for mixed state prediction. An overview of the prediction performance is presented along with analysis of the predictions.

[1]  G. Strang Introduction to Linear Algebra , 1993 .

[2]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry , 1969 .

[3]  Sebastian Ruder,et al.  An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms , 2016, Vestnik komp'iuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologii.

[4]  M. N. Karim,et al.  Comparison of feed-forward and recurrent neural networks for bioprocess state estimation , 1992 .

[5]  Zheng-Yuan Xue,et al.  Quantum hyperparallel algorithm for matrix multiplication , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  W. Wootters Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits , 1997, quant-ph/9709029.

[7]  B. Collins,et al.  Generating random density matrices , 2010, 1010.3570.

[8]  Arthur L. Samuel,et al.  Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers , 1967, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[9]  Didier Dormont,et al.  Spatial Regularization of Svm for the Detection of Diffusion Alterations Associated with Stroke Outcome , 2022 .

[10]  E. Prugovec̆ki,et al.  Quantum Mechanics In Hilbert Space , 1971 .

[11]  David J. Schwab,et al.  Supervised Learning with Quantum-Inspired Tensor Networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[12]  C. Monroe Quantum Entanglement and Information , 2010 .

[13]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states II , 1998, quant-ph/9804024.

[14]  Honglak Lee,et al.  An Analysis of Single-Layer Networks in Unsupervised Feature Learning , 2011, AISTATS.

[15]  N. Bohr II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[16]  J. Neumann Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1955 .

[17]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[18]  H. Kolanoski Application of artificial neural networks in particle physics , 1995 .

[19]  Sadri Hassani,et al.  Foundations Of Mathematical Physics , 1990 .

[20]  Maria Schuld,et al.  The quest for a Quantum Neural Network , 2014, Quantum Information Processing.

[21]  Isaac L. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary edition) , 2011 .

[22]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[23]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[24]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[25]  Dominik Janzing,et al.  Entropy of Entanglement , 2009, Compendium of Quantum Physics.

[26]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.

[27]  Pérès Separability Criterion for Density Matrices. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[28]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Quantum entanglement , 2007, quant-ph/0702225.