Graphical representation of survival curves associated with a binary non-reversible time dependent covariate.

The use of time dependent covariates has allowed for incorporation into analysis of survival data intervening events that are binary and non-reversible (for example, heart transplant, initial response to chemotherapy). We can represent this type of intervening event as a three-state stochastic process with a starting state (S), an intervening state (I), and an absorbing state (D), which usually represents death. In this paper we present three procedures for calculating survivorship functions which attempt to display the prognostic significance of the time dependent covariate. The first method compares survival from baseline for the two possible paths through the stochastic process; the second method compares overall survival to survival with state I removed from the process; and, the third method compares survival for those already in state I at a landmark time x to those in state S at time x who will never enter state I. We develop discrete hazard estimates for the survival curves associated with the three methods. Two examples illustrate how these methods can yield different results and in which situations one might employ each of the three methods. Extensions to applications with reversible binary time dependent covariates and models with both baseline and time dependent covariates are suggested.

[1]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[2]  M. Zelen,et al.  Semi-Markov models for partially censored data , 1978 .

[3]  P. Andersen,et al.  Multistate models in survival analysis: a study of nephropathy and mortality in diabetes. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Bruce W. Turnbull,et al.  Survivorship Analysis of Heart Transplant Data , 1974 .

[5]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[6]  N. Mantel Responder versus nonresponder comparisons: daunorubicin plus prednisone in treatment of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. , 1983, Cancer treatment reports.

[7]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[8]  R Simon,et al.  A non-parametric graphical representation of the relationship between survival and the occurrence of an event: application to responder versus non-responder bias. , 1984, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  J. Hokanson,et al.  Comparing survival of responders and nonresponders after treatment: a potential source of confusion in interpreting cancer clinical trials. , 1983, Controlled clinical trials.

[10]  R W Makuch,et al.  Adjusted survival curve estimation using covariates. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.

[11]  Gregg E. Dinse,et al.  A note on semi-Markov models for partially censored data , 1986 .

[12]  M Pagano,et al.  Corrected group prognostic curves and summary statistics. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  R. Gelber,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of the comparison of survival by treatment outcome variables in cancer clinical trials. , 1985, Cancer treatment reports.

[14]  J R Anderson,et al.  Analysis of survival by tumor response. , 1983, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Nathan Mantel,et al.  Evaluation of Response-Time Data Involving Transient States: An Illustration Using Heart-Transplant Data , 1974 .

[16]  M. Black,et al.  Skin window reactivity to autologous breast cancer. An index of prognostically significant cell‐mediated immunity , 1988, Cancer.

[17]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Reporting results from chemotherapy trials. Does response make a difference in patient survival? , 1984, JAMA.