Pupillary size and responsiveness. Implications for selection of a bifocal intraocular lens.
暂无分享,去创建一个
D D Koch | D. Koch | S W Samuelson | E A Haft | L M Merin | L. Merin | E. Haft | S. W. Samuelson | E. A. Haft | Douglas D. Koch | Lawrence M. Merin
[1] A. Vaško,et al. Dependence on Age of the Diameter of the Pupil in the Dark , 1958, Nature.
[2] J. Botwinick,et al. Age changes in pupil size. , 1950, Journal of gerontology.
[3] H. S. Thompson,et al. Topics in neuro-ophthalmology , 1979 .
[4] M. H. Freeman. Chapter 15 – The eye as an optical system , 1990 .
[5] J. Lewis,et al. The optimal size of a posterior capsulotomy. , 1985, Journal - American Intra-Ocular Implant Society.
[6] John E. Kaufman,et al. IES lighting handbook , 1981 .
[7] Prentice Reeves,et al. Rate of pupillary dilation and contraction. , 1918 .
[8] M Nakazawa,et al. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. , 1983, American journal of ophthalmology.
[9] S. Duke-Elder. Textbook of Ophthalmology , 1950 .
[10] Melvin L. Rubin,et al. Optics for Clinicians , 1974 .
[11] Yves le Grand,et al. Form and Space Vision , 1967 .