Characterization of normative hand movements during two functional upper limb tasks

Background Dexterous hand function is crucial for completing activities of daily living (ADLs), which typically require precise hand-object interactions. Kinematic analyses of hand trajectory, hand velocity, and grip aperture provide valuable mechanistic insights into task performance, but there is a need for standardized tasks representative of ADLs that are amenable to motion capture and show consistent performance in non-disabled individuals. Our objective was to develop two standardized functional upper limb tasks and to quantitatively characterize the kinematics of normative hand movement. Methods Twenty non-disabled participants were recruited to perform two tasks: the Pasta Box Task and Cup Transfer Task. A 12-camera motion capture system was used to collect kinematic data from which hand movement and grip aperture measures were calculated. Measures reported for reach-grasp and transport-release segments were hand distance travelled, hand trajectory variability, movement time, peak and percent-to-peak hand velocity, number of movement units, peak and percent-to-peak grip aperture, and percent-to-peak hand deceleration. A between-session repeatability analysis was conducted on 10 participants. Results Movement times were longer for transport-release compared to reach-grasp for every movement. Hand and grip aperture measures had low variability, with 55 out of 63 measures showing good repeatability (ICC > 0.75). Cross-body movements in the Pasta Box Task had longer movement times and reduced percent-to-peak hand velocity values. The Cup Transfer Task showed decoupling of peak grip aperture and peak hand deceleration for all movements. Movements requiring the clearing of an obstacle while transporting an object displayed a double velocity peak and typically a longer deceleration phase. Discussion Normative hand kinematics for two standardized functional tasks challenging various aspects of hand-object interactions important for ADLs showed excellent repeatability. The consistency in normative task performance across a variety of task demands shows promise as a potential outcome assessment for populations with upper limb impairment.

[1]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  Sydney Y Schaefer,et al.  Grip type and task goal modify reach-to-grasp performance in post-stroke hemiparesis. , 2012, Motor control.

[3]  Hanneke Bouwsema,et al.  Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  J. D. Fisk,et al.  The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[8]  Laura J. Claxton,et al.  Evidence of Motor Planning in Infant Reaching Behavior , 2003, Psychological science.

[9]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[11]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Reliability of kinematic measures of functional reaching in children with cerebral palsy , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  D. Winter Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[13]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[14]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[15]  Jacqueline S. Hebert,et al.  Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  Amy L Ladd,et al.  Temporal-spatial parameters of the upper limb during a Reach & Grasp Cycle for children. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[17]  Alexander W Dromerick,et al.  Characterization of compensatory trunk movements during prosthetic upper limb reaching tasks. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[20]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head) , 1996 .

[21]  Albert H Vette,et al.  Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task , 1990 .

[23]  M. Sheridan,et al.  Coordination between reaching and grasping in patients with hemiparesis and healthy subjects. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  Jason M Wilken,et al.  Range of Motion Requirements for Upper-Limb Activities of Daily Living. , 2015, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[25]  K. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Kinematic Variables Quantifying Upper-Extremity Performance After Stroke During Reaching and Drinking From a Glass , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  James Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Kaat Desloovere,et al.  Upper limb kinematics: development and reliability of a clinical protocol for children. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[28]  Helen Y N Lindner,et al.  Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: evaluation of construct and rating scale. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[29]  Bert Steenbergen,et al.  Norm scores of the box and block test for children ages 3-10 years. , 2013, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[30]  C. Häger,et al.  Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity after stroke – how far have we reached and what have we grasped? , 2015 .

[31]  A. Bagley,et al.  Upper extremity kinematics during functional activities: three-dimensional studies in a normal pediatric population. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[32]  Peter Rosenbaum,et al.  Leisure activity preferences for 6‐ to 12‐year‐old children with cerebral palsy , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[33]  Mark A Robinson,et al.  The reliability of the ELEPAP clinical protocol for the 3D kinematic evaluation of upper limb function. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[34]  Diego Torricelli,et al.  Quantitative assessment based on kinematic measures of functional impairments during upper extremity movements: A review. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  Eli Brenner,et al.  On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[39]  Stefania Fatone,et al.  Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[40]  Dennis A. Nowak,et al.  The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: Usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[41]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Missing in action: the effect of obstacle position and size on avoidance while reaching , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[43]  L. Resnik,et al.  Development and evaluation of the activities measure for upper limb amputees. , 2013, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[44]  Hanneke Bouwsema,et al.  Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[45]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  Craig S. Chapman,et al.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Cerebellar subjects show impaired coupling of reach and grasp movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Linda Tickle-Degnen,et al.  Effects of Object Affordances on Movement Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 1998 .

[49]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[50]  J. Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  P Madeleine,et al.  On functional motor adaptations: from the quantification of motor strategies to the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck–shoulder region , 2010, Acta physiologica.

[52]  Katharina S Sunnerhagen,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of a daily activity drinking from a glass: a pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.