Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: Comparison of imaging and clinical methods

Purpose: The diagnostic value of endorectal coil MRI, body coil MRI, transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination and PSA levels were prospectively analysed in order to define the most accurate preoperative staging method. Methods: 33 patients with prostate carcinoma, who underwent subsequent prostatectomy, were enrolled in the study and examined on a 1.5 T system using the body coil as well as the endorectal surface coil before and after the administration of contrast material. The results were compared to digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen levels and endorectal ultrasound. Results: Staging accuracy of endorectal coil MRI was 87.9% with a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 86.7%. For body coil MRI, the staging accuracy was 75.7%, the sensitivity 66.7% and the specificity 87.9%, for transrectal ultrasound 69.6%, 41.7% and 100% and for the digital rectal examination 56.6%, 33.3% and 100%, respectively. Prediction was improved by combining results of endorectal coil MRI with PSA values. Conclusion: Endorectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination both had a tendency to underestimate the extent of the lesion. Endorectal coil MRI proved to be the best preoperative staging method. In combination with PSA values, diagnostic accuracy could be further improved. Therefore, local staging of prostate cancer could be based on these two parameters alone.

[1]  A. Zietman,et al.  Residual disease after radical surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Clinical significance and therapeutic implications , 1993, Cancer.

[2]  W. Catalona,et al.  Clinical use of prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[3]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[4]  W. Catalona,et al.  Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[5]  S. F. Quinn,et al.  MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. , 1994, Radiology.

[6]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1993, Radiology.

[7]  R. Vessella,et al.  The value of serum prostate specific antigen determinations before and after radical prostatectomy. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[8]  H. Hricak,et al.  MR imaging of the prostate gland: normal anatomy. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  T. Stamey,et al.  Rectal examination in volume determination of carcinoma of the prostate: clinical and anatomical correlations. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[11]  J. Heiken,et al.  Evaluation of the prostate and prostatic carcinoma with gadolinium-enhanced endorectal coil MR imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[12]  P. Scardino,et al.  Staging of prostate cancer: value of ultrasonography , 1989 .

[13]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen in the staging of localized prostate cancer: influence of tumor differentiation, tumor volume and benign hyperplasia. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[14]  H M Pollack,et al.  Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[15]  T. Stamey,et al.  Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Serum Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate , 1987 .

[16]  H. Kressel,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. , 1990, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[17]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Staging of prostate cancer. , 1994, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[18]  D. Newling,et al.  The value of the measurement of serum prostate specific antigen in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and untreated prostate cancer. , 1988, British journal of urology.

[19]  J. Martin,et al.  Inflatable surface coil for MR imaging of the prostate. , 1988, Radiology.

[20]  J. Mohler,et al.  Comparison of the digital rectal examination, endorectal ultrasound, and body coil magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate , 1991, Urologic radiology.

[21]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. , 1989, Radiology.