Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory

The H&H theory is developed from evidence showing that speaking and listening are shaped by biologically general processes. Speech production is adaptive. Speakers can, and typically do, tune their performance according to communicative and situational demands, controlling the interplay between production-oriented factors on the one hand, and output-oriented constraints on the other. For the ideal speaker, H&H claims that such adaptations reflect his tacit awareness of the listener’s access to sources of information independent of the signal and his judgement of the short-term demands for explicit signal information. Hence speakers are expected to vary their output along a continuum of hyper- and hypospeech. The theory suggests that the lack of invariance that speech signals commonly exhibit (Perkell and Klatt 1986) is a direct consequence of this adaptive organization (cf MacNeilage 1970). Accordingly, in the H&H program the quest for phonetic invariance is replaced by another research task: Explicating the notion of sufficient discriminability and defining the class of speech signals that meet that criterion.

[1]  C. Sherrington.  MAN ON HIS NATURE , 1941 .

[2]  K. Lashley.  The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[3]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior , 1953 .

[4]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[6]  B. Lindblom.  Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .

[7]  P. Lieberman.  Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[8]  Eli FISCHER-JGKGENSEN.  Sound Duration and Place of Articulation , 1964 .

[9]  John H. Milsum,et al.  Biological Control Systems Analysis , 1966 .

[10]  S. Öhman.  Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[11]  P. MacNeilage.  Motor control of serial ordering of speech. , 1970, Psychological review.

[12]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[14]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Speech sounds and features , 1973 .

[15]  W. W. Rozeboom,et al.  The psychology of knowing , 1973 .

[16]  K. Moll,et al.  A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities , 1976 .

[17]  R. Granit.  The Purposive Brain , 1977 .

[18]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  E. Bates.  The Emergence Of Symbols , 1979 .

[20]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[21]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  O. I. Fukson,et al.  The spinal frog takes into account the scheme of its body during the wiping reflex. , 1980, Science.

[23]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Production of bite‐block vowels: Acoustic equivalence by selective compensation , 1980 .

[24]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses , 1981, Nature.

[25]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Phonetic features and acoustic invariance in speech , 1981, Cognition.

[26]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[27]  S. Grillner,et al.  POSSIBLE ANALOGIES IN THE CONTROL OF INNATE MOTOR ACTS AND THE PRODUCTION OF SOUND IN SPEECH , 1982 .

[28]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The role of the gross spectral shape as a perceptual cue to place articulation in initial stop consonants. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Economy of Speech Gestures , 1983 .

[30]  R. Shepard.  Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[31]  J. Perkell,et al.  Mandible movements during increasingly rapid articulations of single syllables: preliminary observations. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[33]  Anthony Bladon.  Diphthongs: A case study of dynamic auditory processing , 1985, Speech Commun..

[34]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Action theory: problems and alternative approaches , 1986 .

[35]  P. Luce.  Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon , 1986 .

[36]  C. Fowler.  An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective , 1986 .

[37]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  The dynamical perspectives on speech production: Data and theory , 1986 .

[38]  J. Ohala.  Against the direct realist view of speech perception , 1986 .

[39]  J. Perkell,et al.  Invariance and variability in speech processes , 1987 .

[40]  James D. Miller.  Auditory‐perceptual interpretation of the vowel , 1987 .

[41]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  The Concept of Target and Speech Timing , 1987 .

[42]  F. Lacerda.  Effects of peripheral auditory adaptation on the discrimination of speech sounds , 1987 .

[43]  J. Sundberg,et al.  The Science of Singing Voice , 1987 .

[44]  S. Greenberg.  Representation of Speech in the Auditory Periphery , 1988 .

[45]  O. Engstrand,et al.  Articulatory correlates of stress and speaking rate in Swedish VCV utterances. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  R. Diehl,et al.  Vowel-length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: an auditory explanation , 1988 .

[47]  C. Daniel Geisler,et al.  Representation of speech sounds in the auditory nerve , 1988 .

[48]  R. Schulman,et al.  Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  R. Diehl,et al.  On the Objects of Speech Perception , 1989 .

[50]  D. Klatt.  Review of selected models of speech perception , 1989 .

[51]  W. Strange.  Evolving theories of vowel perception. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  E. Keller.  Speech Motor Timing , 1990 .

[53]  Klaus J. Kohler,et al.  Segmental Reduction in Connected Speech in German: Phonological Facts and Phonetic Explanations , 1990 .

[54]  Osamu Fujimura,et al.  Articulatory Perspectives of Speech Organization , 1990 .

[55]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .