The importance of spatial orientation and knowledge of traffic signs for children's traffic safety.

Pre-school children, as well as children from lower grades in primary school, who although rarely, completely independently participate in traffic, represent a vulnerable population from the standpoint of traffic safety. The greatest number of children were injured or killed in road traffic crashes on their way from home to kindergarten or school. Mostly due to lack of experience, children's behavior is confusing and often reckless and hasty. Safe behavior in the traffic environment demands certain cognitive skills. Unlike adults, children have less than fully developed peripheral vision. Also, changes occur in color perception, i.e. discrimination. All this leads to the conclusion that the stage of physical and mental development of the child is very important for safe participation in traffic. So, to estimate if they are sufficiently equipped to participate safely in traffic, a sensitive test for young children that may be suitable for their level of cognitive development is required. Accordingly, road safety education should be arranged in such a way that considers the child's level of development, as has been shown to be more effective when started at younger ages. Play is the most natural and easiest way of learning because it is the lens through which children experience their world, and the world of others. Having this in mind, if we want to measure the abilities of a child, and their preparedness for safety participation in traffic, unavoidable is to use non-verbal tests. The purpose of this study is to explore primary schooler's spatial, and abilities of color perception and memorization, as well as their performances in interpreting the meaning of traffic signs. In addition, neighborhood environmental correlates (rural-urban) and possible individual differences influences on the relationship among these abilities was examined. Knowledge about these factors affecting children's safety can be applied to improve relevant intervention measures for promoting safe participation of young children in traffic. It may constitute the basis for effective classroom work which implies the creation of individualized educational plans and programs, through which road safety skills could be acquired and adopted through play.

[1]  S. Sandels Young children in traffic. , 1970, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Na’ama Eisenbach,et al.  Identification and characterization of symbols emanating from the spontaneous artwork of survivors of childhood trauma , 2015 .

[3]  William M. Murrah,et al.  How Are Motor Skills Linked to Children's School Performance and Academic Achievement? , 2016 .

[4]  Jodie M. Plumert,et al.  Flexibility in children's use of spatial and categorical organizational strategies in recall , 1994 .

[5]  Julie A. Kientz,et al.  Hidden symbols: How informal symbolism in digital interfaces disrupts usability for preschoolers , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  P F Agran,et al.  Differences in child pedestrian injury events by location. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[7]  Masayoshi Okamoto,et al.  Influence of Age-Related Stature on the Frequency of Body Region Injury and Overall Injury Severity in Child Pedestrian Casualties , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking: Functional Significance of Visuospatial Representations , 2005 .

[9]  Patrick Waterson,et al.  The development of guidelines for the design and evaluation of warning signs for young children. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  R. Schieber,et al.  Developmental risk factors for childhood pedestrian injuries. , 1996, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[12]  Susanna Millar,et al.  External and body-centered frames of reference in spatial memory: Evidence from touch , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  A. Henderson,et al.  Descriptive analysis of the developmental progression of grip position for pencil and crayon control in nondysfunctional children. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[14]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[15]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[16]  M Suzanne Zeedyk,et al.  Stop, look, listen, and think? What young children really do when crossing the road. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  W. S. Voon,et al.  An Overview of Road Traffic Injuries Among Children in Malaysia and Its Implication on Road Traffic InjuryPrevention Strategy , 2011 .

[18]  J. Plumert,et al.  How Do Opportunities to View Objects Together in Time Influence Children's Memory for Location? , 2009 .

[19]  J. Plumert,et al.  Developmental Differences in Preferences for Using Color, Size, and Location Information to Disambiguate Hiding Places , 2007 .

[20]  E. Alant,et al.  Children's identification of graphic symbols representing four basic emotions: comparison of Afrikaans-speaking and Sepedi-speaking children. , 2014, Journal of communication disorders.

[21]  Marja P. Vinje,et al.  Children as pedestrians: Abilities and limitations , 1981 .

[22]  George L. Dunbar,et al.  Young children's concepts of danger , 2000 .

[23]  E Turmel,et al.  Active and safe transportation of elementary-school students: comparative analysis of the risks of injury associated with children travelling by car, walking and cycling between home and school. , 2014, Chronic diseases and injuries in Canada.

[24]  J. Plumert Children's thinking is not just about what is in the head: understanding the organism and environment as a unified system. , 2008, Advances in child development and behavior.

[25]  Microdevelopment of Complex Featural and Spatial Integration with Contextual Support , 2015 .

[26]  Jelle Jolles,et al.  Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5- to 6-year-old children: results from a large-scale cross-sectional study. , 2005, Child development.

[27]  Francesco Pinna,et al.  ROAD SIGNS: WALKING AMONG SHAPES AND COLORS , 2013 .

[28]  Nicola J. Pitchford,et al.  The interrelation between cognitive and motor development in typically developing children aged 4-11 years is underpinned by visual processing and fine manual control. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[29]  Stefan Ehrlich,et al.  Influence of age and movement complexity on kinematic hand movement parameters in childhood and adolescence , 2008, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[30]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications , 1995 .

[31]  David C Schwebel,et al.  Child Pedestrian Injury , 2012, American journal of lifestyle medicine.

[32]  M Suzanne Zeedyk,et al.  Behavioural observations of adult-child pairs at pedestrian crossings. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Albert Postma,et al.  Categorical and metric distance information in mental representations derived from route and survey descriptions , 2005, Psychological research.

[34]  M. Bamba [Infants and children]. , 2012, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[35]  Eva Olofsson,et al.  Children injured in traffic in a medical and psychosocial perspective : causes and consequences , 2014 .

[36]  Gabriele Giustiniani,et al.  Analysis of road safety management in the European countries. Deliverable 1.5 Vol.II of the EC FP7 project DaCoTA , 2012 .