Bougie‐assisted difficult airway management in a manikin – the effect of position held on placement and force exerted by the tip *

In a randomised cross‐over study, 50 anaesthetists attempted to place a multiple‐use bougie in the trachea of a manikin, when holding it at either 20 cm or 30 cm from the tip. A grade 3 laryngoscopic view was simulated. The anaesthetists were blinded to success (tracheal placement) or failure (oesophageal placement). The success rates when held at 20 and 30 cm distance from the tip were 68 and 62%, respectively (p = 0.55). In a separate experiment, multiple and single‐use bougies were held at four different positions and pressed onto a disc attached to a force transducer. The peak force exerted by the single‐use bougies was two to three times greater than that which could be exerted by the multiple‐use bougies (p < 0.0001). Holding the bougie at either 20 or 30 cm distance from the tip is unlikely to influence bougie placement. The single‐use bougie is much more likely to cause trauma to tissue during placement, particularly if held close to the tip.

[1]  J. Benumof,et al.  Quantitative improvement in laryngoscopic view by optimal external laryngeal manipulation. , 1996, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[2]  J. Pandit,et al.  Comparison of the single‐use plastic bougie and the multiple‐use gum elastic bougie for tracheal intubation in simulated grade‐3 difficult laryngoscopy , 2003 .

[3]  P. Latto Fracture of the outer varnish layer of a gum elastic bougie , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[4]  A. Wilkes,et al.  To shape or not to shape…Simulated bougie‐assisted difficult intubation in a manikin * , 2003, Anaesthesia.

[5]  M. Clancy,et al.  Difficult airway equipment in English emergency departments , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[6]  Rob Pm Critical incident with gum elastic bougie. , 1995 .

[7]  M. Stacey,et al.  Survey of the use of the gum elastic bougie in clinical practice. , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[8]  J. M. Cupitt Microbial contamination of gum elastic bougies , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[9]  I Russell,et al.  Statistics--with confidence? , 1991, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[10]  J. Collinge,et al.  Diagnosis of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by tonsil biopsy , 1997, The Lancet.

[11]  A R Wilkes,et al.  A comparison of simulated difficult intubation with multiple‐use and single‐use bougies in a manikin * , 2003, Anaesthesia.

[12]  J. Henderson,et al.  Bougie trauma--what trauma? , 2003, Anaesthesia.

[13]  F. Gamlin,et al.  Mediastinitis and sepsis syndrome following intubation , 1994, Anaesthesia.

[14]  Eltringham Rj,et al.  Surgical emphysema of the neck. , 1989 .

[15]  C. Jackson The technique of insertion of intratracheal insufflation tubes , 1996 .

[16]  J. Stephenson,et al.  Microbial contamination of gum‐elastic bougies , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[17]  M. Smithson Statistics with confidence , 2000 .

[18]  S. Gupta,et al.  Is your bougie helping or hindering you? , 2001, Anaesthesia.

[19]  G. Williams,et al.  The rigid nasendoscope as a tool for difficult tracheal intubation: A manikin study * , 2003, Anaesthesia.

[20]  R S Cormack,et al.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics , 1983, Anaesthesia.

[21]  I. Calder,et al.  Prevention of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: ephedrine infusion versus fluid preload , 1997, Anaesthesia.

[22]  M. Popat,et al.  Pharyngeal wall perforation — an unusual complication of blind intubation with a gum elastic bougic , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[23]  A. Baker Critical incident with gum elastic bougie. , 1996, Anaesthesia and intensive care.