An Introduction to the Practice of Ecological Modeling

odeling has become an important tool in the study of ecological systems,as a scan of the table of con tents of a ny major eco l ogical journ a l makes abundantly clear. A number of books have recently been published that provide excellent advice on mo del construction, building, and use (e.g.,Gotelli 1995, Gurney and Nisbet 1998, Roughgarden 1998) and add to the classic literature on mo deling ecological systems and their dynamics (e.g., Maynard Smith 1974, Nisbet and Gurney 1 9 8 2 ) . Un fortu n a tely, h owever, l i t t l e — i f a ny — of t h i s growing literature on e cological modeling addresses the motivation to model and the initial stages of the modeling process, information that beginning students would find useful. Fast computers and graphical software packages have removed much of the drudgery of creating models with a programming language and opened new avenues of model construction,use,and even misuse. There are many reasons why a student might want to consider modeling as a component of his or her education. Models p rovide an opportunity to explo re ideas regarding ecological systems that it may not be possible to field-test for logistical, political, or financial reasons. Often, learning occurs from apparently st range results and unexpected sur prises. The process of formulating an e cological model is ext remely helpful for organizing one’s thinking , bringing hidden assumptions to light, and identifying data needs. More and more,students want to “do something” with modeling but are not sure how to get started. The goals of this article are to outline issues concerning the value of ecological models and some possible motivations for mo deling, and to provide an entry point to the established modeling literature so that those who are beginning to think about using models in their research can integrate modeling usefully. We therefore envision the typical reader to be an advanced undergraduate, a beginning graduate student, or a new modeler. We first consider some of the values of models and the motivation for modeling. We then discuss the steps involved in developing a mo del from an initial idea to something that is implemented on a computer, outlining some of the decisions that must be ma de along the way. Many excellent texts and journal articles deal with the technical details of models and model construction; we do not attempt to replace this literature, but rather try to make the reader aware of the issues that must be considered and point to some of the sources we have found particularly useful. We b egin with the assumption that the reader has decided that he or she would like to “do something” with modeling as part of his or her research (Figure 1). It is important to recognize the difference between models and the modeling process. A model is a representation of a particular thing, idea, or condition. Models can be as simple as a verbal statement about a subje ct or two boxes c onnected by an arrow to represent some r elationship. Alternatively, models can be ext remely c omplex and detailed, such as a mathematical description of the pathways o f nitrogen t ransformations within ecosystems. The model ing process is the series of steps taken to convert an idea first into a conceptual model and then into a quantitative m odel . Because part of what eco l ogists do is revi s e hypotheses and collect new data, the model and the view of nature that it r epresents often und ergo many changes from the initial conception to what is d eemed the final product. The discussion that follows is organized to consider issues in a sequence similar to what a new modeler would encounter. Because individuals’ backgrounds differ, the sequence is not fixed. We map one possible route through the sorts of decisions that will most lik ely need to be considered; this course is derived from our individual experiences plus the collective knowledge o f our reviewers. We begin with conceptual models because many people, even self-labeled nonmodelers, formulate conceptual models.

[1]  D. Brown,et al.  Models in biology : mathematics, statistics and computing , 1995 .

[2]  D. L. DeAngelis,et al.  Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs , 1992, Population and Community Biology Series.

[3]  D. Hamby A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[4]  Hal Caswell,et al.  12 – The Validation Problem , 1976 .

[5]  J. Logan,et al.  In Defense of Big Ugly Models , 1994 .

[6]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A Critical Appraisal of Population Approaches in Assessing Fish Community Health , 1990 .

[7]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Temporal Variation in Regulation of Production in a Pelagic Food Web Model , 1988 .

[8]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  On the Practice of Ecology , 1995 .

[9]  Daniel E. Schindler,et al.  Food Web Structure and Long-Term Phosphorus Recycling: A Simulation Model Evaluation , 1993 .

[10]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Primer of ecological theory , 1997 .

[11]  Michael Power,et al.  The predictive validation of ecological and environmental models , 1993 .

[12]  O. Diekmann,et al.  Studying the Dynamics of Structured Population Models: A Versatile Technique and Its Application to Daphnia , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[13]  C. Walters,et al.  Are age-structured models appropriate for catch-effort data? , 1985 .

[14]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Modeling in the Lake Mendota Program: An Overview , 1992 .

[15]  G. Swartzman,et al.  Ecological Simulation Primer , 1988 .

[16]  Lars G. Rudstam,et al.  Fisheries Management and the Interactive Dynamics of Walleye and Perch Populations , 1992 .

[17]  L. J. Jackson,et al.  A simulation model of PCB dynamics in the Lake Ontario pelagic food web , 1996 .

[18]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Individual-based simulation models for forest succession and management , 1995 .

[19]  J. Roughgarden Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction , 1995 .

[20]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Mathematical Ecology: An Introduction , 1986 .

[21]  Lars Håkanson,et al.  A REVIEW ON EFFECT-DOSE-SENSITIVITY MODELS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS , 1994 .

[22]  Joseph F. Koonce,et al.  Sustainability of Hatchery-Dependent Salmonine Fisheries in Lake Ontario: The Conflict between Predator Demand and Prey Supply , 1993 .

[23]  Donald Scavia,et al.  Perspectives on lake ecosystem modeling , 1979 .

[24]  K. Rose,et al.  Factors Affecting Competitive Dominance of Rainbow Trout over Brook Trout in Southern Appalachian Streams: Implications of an Individual-Based Model , 1997 .

[25]  R. May,et al.  Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control , 1991, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Concepts in Ecological Models , 1987 .

[27]  H. Caswell Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation , 2001 .

[28]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .

[29]  William Gurney,et al.  Modelling fluctuating populations , 1982 .

[30]  Edward J. Rykiel,et al.  Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation , 1996 .

[31]  M. Turner,et al.  Usefulness of spatially explicit population models in land management , 1995 .

[32]  Edward B. Rastetter,et al.  Validating models of ecosystem response to global change , 1996 .

[33]  S. Carpenter,et al.  PCB Accumulation in Lake Michigan Coho and Chinook Salmon: Individual-Based Models Using Allometric Relationships. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  F. H. Rigler,et al.  The phosphorus‐chlorophyll relationship in lakes1,2 , 1974 .

[35]  D. C. West,et al.  Forest Succession Models , 1980 .

[36]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  New Computer Models Unify Ecological TheoryComputer simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms , 1988 .

[37]  Forman S. Acton Real Computing Made Real: Preventing Errors in Scientific and Engineering Calculations , 1996 .

[38]  A. Starfield A pragmatic approach to modeling for wildlife management , 1997 .

[39]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  The Influence of Model Structure on Conclusions about the Viability and Harvesting of Serengeti Wildebeest , 1997 .

[40]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Simulation of the Effects of Time and Size at Stocking on PCB Accumulation in Lake Trout , 1993 .

[41]  Kendall E. Atkinson An introduction to numerical analysis , 1978 .

[42]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[43]  Scott Stewart,et al.  A model of bluegill-largemouth bass interactions in relation to aquatic vegetation and its management , 1997 .

[44]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[45]  John Vandermeer,et al.  Elementary Mathematical Ecology , 1982 .

[46]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  Individual Parameter Perturbation and Error Analysis of Fish Bioenergetics Models , 1986 .

[47]  L. Crowder,et al.  Assessing Population Responses to Multiple Anthropogenic Effects: A Case Study with Brook Trout , 1996 .

[48]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  A Primer of Ecology , 1995 .

[49]  T. Fagerström On theory, data and mathematics in ecology , 1987 .

[50]  S. Jørgensen Handbook of Ecological Parameters and Ecotoxicology , 1991 .

[51]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Uncertainty, System Identification, and the Prediction of Water Quality , 1983 .

[52]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[53]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  A comparison of tree growth models , 1985 .

[54]  L. J. Jackson,et al.  PISCIVORES, PREDATION, AND PCBs IN LAKE ONTARIO’S PELAGIC FOOD WEB , 1997 .

[55]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Strategies and difficulties of applying models to aquatic populations and food webs , 1988 .

[56]  B. Danielson,et al.  Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses , 1995 .

[57]  Leland J. Jackson How Will Decreased Alewife Growth Rates and Salmonid Stocking Affect Sport Fish PCB Concentrations in Lake Ontario , 1996 .

[58]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[59]  Kimberly G. Smith,et al.  Metapopulations and wildlife conservation , 1997 .

[60]  D. L. Scarnecchia,et al.  Fundamentals of Ecological Modelling , 1995 .

[61]  John Maynard Smith Models in ecology , 1974 .

[62]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Predictive Indices of Ecosystem Resilience in Models of North Temperate Lakes , 1994 .

[63]  F. Sklar,et al.  Articulation, accuracy and effectiveness of mathematical models: A review of freshwater wetland applications☆ , 1985 .

[64]  R. Levins The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[65]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  Chapter 17 , 2019 .

[66]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Replication and Treatment Strength in Whole‐Lake Experiments , 1989 .

[67]  Anthony W King,et al.  Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.