Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.

In this article, ambiguity and synonymy effects were examined in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks. Whereas the typical ambiguity advantage was observed in lexical decision and naming, an ambiguity disadvantage was observed in semantic categorization. In addition, a synonymy effect (slower latencies for words with many synonyms than for words with few synonyms) was observed in lexical decision and naming but not in semantic categorization. These results suggest that (a) an ambiguity disadvantage arises only when a task requires semantic processing, (b) the ambiguity advantage and the synonymy disadvantage in lexical decision and naming are due to semantic feedback, and (c) these effects are determined by the nature of the feedback relationships from semantics to orthography and phonology.

[1]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[2]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .

[3]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[4]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[5]  James D. Church,et al.  Comments on Clark's “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy” , 1976 .

[6]  K. Forster,et al.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  Discussion of Wike and Church's comments , 1976 .

[8]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[9]  Derek Besner,et al.  Phonological recoding and lexical access , 1978 .

[10]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[11]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[12]  M Coltheart,et al.  Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[13]  J. Jastrzembski.  Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[15]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[16]  Derek Besner,et al.  Basic decoding components in reading: Two dissociable feature extraction processes. , 1983 .

[17]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .

[18]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[21]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[22]  G. V. van Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[23]  M. Coltheart.  Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[24]  G. C. Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[25]  Derek Besner,et al.  Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? , 1988 .

[26]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[27]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking*1 , 1988 .

[28]  G Kellas,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[31]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[32]  M. L. Millis,et al.  The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don’t , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[33]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[35]  Ken N. Seergobin,et al.  On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? , 1990 .

[36]  David A. Balota.  Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[37]  G. Stone,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[38]  Michael Garman,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .

[39]  Alan H. Kawamoto,et al.  Pronunciation of homographs , 1992 .

[40]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Chapter 5 Beyond Orthographic Depth in Reading: Equitable Division of Labor , 1992 .

[41]  B. Abbott,et al.  The Psychology of Word Meanings. , 1992 .

[42]  D. Besner,et al.  The process of lexical decision: More words about a parallel distributed processing model. , 1992 .

[43]  Ram Frost,et al.  Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning , 1992 .

[44]  A. H. Kawamoto.  Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .

[45]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Generalization with Componential Attractors: Word and Nonword Reading in an Attractor Network , 1993 .

[46]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Derek Besner,et al.  When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling. , 1994 .

[48]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[49]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  When Two Meanings Are Better Than One: Modeling the Ambiguity Advantage Using a Recurrent Distributed Network , 1994 .

[50]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  Jay G. Rueckl,et al.  Ambiguity and connectionist networks: Still settling into a solution: Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994). , 1995 .

[52]  James H. Neely,et al.  When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .

[53]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Unsettling Questions About Semantic Ambiguity in Connectionist Models: Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994) , 1995 .

[54]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[55]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Familiarity and relatedness of word meanings: Ratings for 110 homographs , 1996 .

[56]  J. E.,et al.  Semantic Ambiguity Effects in Word Identification , 1996 .

[57]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[58]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .

[59]  J. Ziegler,et al.  The Feedback Consistency Effect in Lexical Decision and Naming , 1997 .

[60]  G. Stone,et al.  Perception Is a Two-Way Street: Feedforward and Feedback Phonology in Visual Word Recognition ☆ , 1997 .

[61]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[62]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[63]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[64]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Why SAFE Is Better Than FAST: The Relatedness of a Word's Meanings Affects Lexical Decision Times , 1997 .

[65]  R. Peereman,et al.  Is perception a two-way street ?: The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition , 1998 .

[66]  S. Lupker,et al.  The effects of polysemy for Japanese katakana words , 1998 .

[67]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phonological Priming by Masked Nonword Primes in the Lexical Decision Task , 1998 .

[68]  M. Taft,et al.  Lack of Phonological Mediation in a Semantic Categorization Task , 1998 .

[69]  R. R. Peterson,et al.  Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. , 1998 .

[70]  David A. Balota,et al.  The Utility of Item-Level Analyses in Model Evaluation: A Reply to Seidenberg and Plaut , 1998 .

[71]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[72]  Patricia A. McMullen,et al.  Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia , 1999 .

[73]  G O Stone,et al.  Reading homographs: orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Polysemy effects in word naming. , 1999 .

[75]  Takao Fushimi,et al.  Consistency, frequency, and lexicality effects in naming Japanese Kanji. , 1999 .

[76]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[77]  S. Lupker,et al.  Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  S. Joordens,et al.  Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[79]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000 .

[80]  George S. Cree,et al.  Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits , 2001 .

[81]  D Jared,et al.  Homophone effects in lexical decision. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[82]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The Effects of Word Frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji Words in Naming and Lexical Decision: Can the Dual-Route Model Save the Lexical-Selection Account? , 1998 .

[83]  D. Pecher,et al.  Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[84]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2001 .

[85]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[86]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Representation of Polysemous Words , 2001 .

[87]  Jodi D. Edwards,et al.  What Can Homophone Effects Tell Us About the Nature of Orthographic Representation in Visual Word Recognition , 2001 .

[88]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[89]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Category specificity in brain and mind , 2002 .

[90]  S. Lupker,et al.  Phonological effects in visual word recognition: investigating the impact of feedback activation. , 2002, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[91]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition , 1995 .