Secondary spectrum oligopoly market over large locations

We investigate a secondary spectrum market where each primary owns a channel over large number of locations. Each primary sells its channel to the secondaries in exchange of a price. However, the secondaries can not transmit simultaneously at interfering locations. A primary must select a price and a set on non-interfering locations for its available channel where the availability of a channel for sale evolves randomly. The set of non-interfering locations turns out to be an independent set in the conflict graph representation of the region. The primary needs to find a strategy for each possible channel state vector. We consider node symmetric conflict graphs which arise frequently in practice when the number of locations is large (potentially, infinite). Since there is a symmetry in the interference relationship, we also consider a symmetric relationship among the joint probability distribution of the channel state vectors. We show that that a symmetric NE exists and explicitly compute it. In the symmetric NE a primary randomizes equally among the maximum independent sets at a given channel state vector. The symmetric NE exhibits several important structural differences compared to the symmetric NE strategy for small number of locations which we have obtained in our earlier works. The conflict graph representation depends on the channel state vector, thus, it is a random graph. We also empirically and theoretically investigate the expected component size in random conflict graphs which governs the computation of maximum independent sets. Our analysis shows that the mean component size is in general moderate, however, it can be high when the channel availability probability is very high. We show that with random sampling method, a primary can govern the mean component size. We numerically evaluate the ratio of the expected payoff attained by primaries in the game and the payoff attained by primaries when all the primaries collude.

[1]  Saswati Sarkar,et al.  Quality-Sensitive Price Competition in Secondary Market Spectrum Oligopoly—Single Location Game , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[2]  Shamik Sengupta,et al.  An economic framework for dynamic spectrum access and service pricing , 2009, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw..

[3]  Saswati Sarkar,et al.  Quality sensitive price competition in spectrum oligopoly over multiple locations , 2014, 2014 48th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS).

[4]  Dusit Niyato,et al.  Competitive Pricing for Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks: Dynamic Game, Inefficiency of Nash Equilibrium, and Collusion , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[6]  R. Srikant,et al.  Low-Complexity Distributed Scheduling Algorithms for Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[7]  Martin J. Osborne,et al.  Price competition in a capacity-constrained duopoly , 1986 .

[8]  G. Sabidussi Vertex-transitive graphs , 1964 .

[9]  Saswati Sarkar,et al.  Quality Sensitive Price Competition in Spectrum Oligopoly: Part 1 , 2014, ArXiv.

[10]  David W. Matula,et al.  Regular Triangulated Toroidal Graphs with Applications to Cellular and Interconnection Networks , 2002, J. Graph Algorithms Appl..

[11]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes , 1983 .

[12]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Markov Random Field Modeling in Computer Vision , 1995, Computer Science Workbench.

[13]  Saswati Sarkar,et al.  Quality sensitive price competition in spectrum oligopoly , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[14]  David Starobinski,et al.  Competition in secondary spectrum markets: Price war or market sharing? , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[15]  Patrick Maillé,et al.  Price War with Partial Spectrum Sharing for Competitive Wireless Service Providers , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[16]  M. Chatterjee,et al.  An Economic Framework for Dynamic Spectrum Access and Service Pricing , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[17]  Kathryn Fraughnaugh,et al.  Introduction to graph theory , 1973, Mathematical Gazette.

[18]  T. E. Harris,et al.  The Theory of Branching Processes. , 1963 .