Quantum Auctions: Facts and Myths ⋆

Quantum game theory, whatever opinions may be held due to its abstract physical formalism, have already found various applications even outside the orthodox physics domain. In this paper we introduce the concept of a quantum auction, its advantages and drawbacks. Then we describe the models that have already been put forward. A general model involves Wigner formalism and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces — we envisage that the implementation might not be an easy task. But a restricted model advocated by the Hewlett–Packard group (Hogg et al.) seems to be much easier to implement. We focus on problems related to combinatorial auctions and technical assumptions that are made. Powerful quantum algorithms for finding solutions would extend the range of possible applications. Quantum strategies, being qubits, can be teleported but are immune from cloning — therefore extreme privacy of the agent’s activity could in principle be guaranteed. Then we point out some key problems that have to be solved before commercial use would be possible. With present technology, optical networks, single photon sources and detectors seems to be sufficient for an experimental realization in the near future.

[1]  The Merchandising Mathematician Model , 2001, cond-mat/0102174.

[2]  L. Goldenberg,et al.  Quantum Gambling , 1998, quant-ph/9808001.

[3]  Jan Sładkowski,et al.  Quantum games in finance , 2004 .

[4]  E. W. Piotrowski,et al.  Quantum bargaining games , 2002 .

[5]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Quantum Auctions , 2007, 0704.0800.

[6]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Quantum models of Parrondo's games , 2002, SPIE Micro + Nano Materials, Devices, and Applications.

[7]  E. W. Piotrowski,et al.  Interference of quantum market strategies , 2003 .

[8]  J. Sladkowski,et al.  Quantum-like approach to financial risk: quantum anthropic principle , 2001, quant-ph/0110046.

[9]  E. W. Piotrowski,et al.  Quantum Market Games , 2001 .

[10]  Stephen Wiesner,et al.  Conjugate coding , 1983, SIGA.

[11]  Damiano Brigo,et al.  Approximated moment-matching dynamics for basket-options pricing , 2004 .

[12]  E. W. Piotrowski,et al.  Quantum English auctions , 2001 .

[13]  D. Meyer Quantum strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9804010.

[14]  Edward W. Piotrowski,et al.  The merchandising mathematician model: profit intensities , 2003 .

[15]  C. Gonçalves An Evolutionary Quantum Game Model of Financial Market Dynamics - Theory and Evidence , 2007 .

[16]  Edward W. Piotrowski,et al.  An Invitation to Quantum Game Theory , 2002, ArXiv.

[17]  Philip Walther,et al.  Experimental realization of a quantum game on a one-way quantum computer , 2007, 0708.1129.

[18]  J. Eisert,et al.  Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9806088.

[19]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Betting boolean-style: a framework for trading in securities based on logical formulas , 2003, EC '03.

[20]  E. Beltrametti,et al.  A classical extension of quantum mechanics , 1995 .

[21]  T. Hogg Adiabatic Quantum Computing for Random Satisfiability Problems , 2002, quant-ph/0206059.

[22]  Navroz Patel Quantum games: States of play , 2007, Nature.

[23]  J. Sladkowski,et al.  The next stage: quantum game theory , 2003, quant-ph/0308027.

[24]  L. Vaidman Variations on the Theme of the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger Proof , 1998 .

[25]  Jiangfeng Du,et al.  Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer. , 2001, Physical Review Letters.

[26]  Edward W. Piotrowski,et al.  Quantum Game Theory in Finance , 2004 .

[27]  Maureen Shawn Kennedy The states of play. , 2008, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[28]  M. Kim,et al.  Hybrid cluster state proposal for a quantum game , 2005, quant-ph/0509066.

[29]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Experiments with probabilistic quantum auctions , 2007, Quantum Inf. Process..

[30]  Azhar Iqbal Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games , 2005 .

[31]  Tad Hogg,et al.  QUANTUM AUCTIONS USING ADIABATIC EVOLUTION: THE CORRUPT AUCTIONEER AND CIRCUIT IMPLEMENTATIONS , 2007, 0707.2051.