The structure of the Toyota supply network: The emergence ofresilience

We assemble a large‐scale empirical dataset that allows us to examine the local and global topology of relationships between firms in the Toyota supply network. On this basis we propose novel measures that allow us to characterise the resilience of the entire supply network. Our findings show that simple linear supply chain models are inadequate, because they neglect important lateral dependencies between suppliers. Hence, we argue that it is necessary to describe and model the supply chain as a complex network. We observe that the degree distribution for this network scales exponentially, so that disruptions at randomly chosen suppliers have little impact but vulnerability to disruptions at highly connected suppliers is significant. These potential vulnerabilities are mitigated by the network’s ‘small‐world’ structure, where the average path to any given supplier via other suppliers is very low, and the number of relations between suppliers that produce the same product types is high, especially within the Kyoho‐kai supplier association. Membership of the tightly‐knit Kyoho‐kai supplier association is positively correlated with an increase in the number of connections that a supplier has, leading to a segmentation that favours highly connected hubs. The network also exhibits a high degree of product type redundancy, where multiple suppliers offer similar product types. When we examine product diversity along the chain we find that upper tiers show higher diversification given their vulnerability to changing customer demands. Our analysis of a unique, large‐scale empirical dataset aims to move the field of supply chain management beyond stylised facts, and to demonstrate how methods from interdisciplinary work on complex networks can contribute novel insights.

[1]  S. Lazzarini,et al.  Integrating supply chain and network analyses: The study of netchains , 2001 .

[2]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next “Best Practice” in Supply Chain Management , 1998 .

[3]  S. Borgatti,et al.  On Social Network Analysis in a Supply Chain Context , 2009 .

[4]  H. Pfohl,et al.  Inter‐organizational logistics systems in flexible production networks , 2000 .

[5]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[6]  Mari Sako,et al.  SUPPLIERS' ASSOCIATIONS IN THE JAPANESE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY: COLLECTIVE ACTION FOR TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION , 1996 .

[7]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Vertical Flexibility in Supply Chains , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Esmail Mohebbi,et al.  A replenishment model for the supply-uncertainty problem , 2004 .

[9]  Toby E. Stuart Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Yimin Wang,et al.  On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[12]  I. Lubashevsky,et al.  Remarks on scaling properties inherent to the systems with hierarchically organized supplying network , 2000 .

[13]  Panagiotis Kouvelis,et al.  Robust scheduling to hedge against processing time uncertainty in single-stage production , 1995 .

[14]  Richard Lamming,et al.  Japanese supply chain relationships in recession , 2000 .

[15]  Mark S. Daskin,et al.  Planning for Disruptions in Supply Chain Networks , 2006 .

[16]  Lawrence V. Snyder,et al.  Reliability Models for Facility Location: The Expected Failure Cost Case , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[17]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality , 1992 .

[18]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and U. S. auto plants , 1991 .

[19]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[20]  西口 敏宏 Strategic industrial sourcing : the Japanese advantage , 1994 .

[21]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[22]  Guido Nassimbeni,et al.  Supply networks: Genesis, stability and logistics implications. A comparative analysis of two districts , 1995 .

[23]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Unveiling the structure of supply networks: case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler , 2002 .

[24]  L. Ellram,et al.  Buyer-supplier relationships: alternative research approaches , 1997 .

[25]  Louise Knight,et al.  Supply network strategy:role and competence requirements , 2001 .

[26]  Keqiang Wang,et al.  Structure Analysis of Supply Chain Networks Based on Complex Network Theory , 2008, SKG.

[27]  E A Leicht,et al.  Mixture models and exploratory analysis in networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  The optimal mix of flexible and dedicated manufacturing capacities: Hedging against demand uncertainty , 1992 .

[29]  Richard L. Church,et al.  A Median Location Model with Nonclosest Facility Service , 1985, Transp. Sci..

[30]  M. Parlar,et al.  Future supply uncertainty in EOQ models , 1991 .

[31]  Mahmut Parlar,et al.  Continuous-review inventory problem with random supply interruptions , 1997 .

[32]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility , 1995 .

[33]  Hau L. Lee The triple-A supply chain. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[34]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Taking the leap from dyads to triads: Buyer–supplier relationships in supply networks , 2009 .

[35]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Manufacturing Relations: An Empirical Study of the Organization of Production Across Multiple Networks , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Soundar R. T. Kumara,et al.  Survivability of multiagent-based supply networks: a topological perspect , 2004, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[37]  Alexandre Beaudet,et al.  The Toyota Group and the Aisin Fire , 1998 .

[38]  Lawrence V. Snyder,et al.  Inventory Management with Advanced Warning of Disruptions , 2005 .

[39]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .