Discretized Target Size Detection in Electrical Impedance Tomography Using Neural Network Classifier

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) uses non-invasive and non-radiative imaging to detect inhomogeneous electrical properties in tissues. The inverse problem of EIT is a highly nonlinear, ill-posed problem, which causes inaccuracy in target size calculation. We propose a novel approach to discretize the target size and use a neural network (NN) classifier to classify the unknown size in discrete steps. The target size is discretized into distinct steps, and each step can be a unique class. The data is pre-processed with the cumulative distribution transform (CDT) to enhance distinguishability. First, the NN is trained with simulated datasets, divided into time difference (t-d) group and CDT group. After training, the NN classifier is tested by experimental data recorded in a phantom experiment. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is performed to assess the distinguishability of classes. There is a significant increase in distance between classes after the CDT pre-processing. The density of the classes has an upward trend with a higher degree of clustering after CDT pre-processing. The CDT data clustering into distinguishable classes is essential to excellent NN classification results. Such an approach is a significant paradigm shift by turning the cumbersome inverse calculation with uncertain accuracy into a classification problem with predetermined step errors. The accuracy and resolution can be further extended by increasing the discretization steps.

[1]  Hao-Min Cheng,et al.  Improved Imaging Resolution of Electrical Impedance Tomography Using Artificial Neural Networks for Image Reconstruction , 2019, 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[2]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Yang Zou,et al.  Sliced Wasserstein Kernels for Probability Distributions , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[4]  Gustavo K. Rohde,et al.  Accurate diagnosis of thyroid follicular lesions from nuclear morphology using supervised learning , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  Gustavo K. Rohde,et al.  Transport-based analysis, modeling, and learning from signal and data distributions , 2016, ArXiv.

[6]  Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb,et al.  Imaging with Kantorovich-Rubinstein Discrepancy , 2014, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[7]  Model of Magnetic Anisotropy of Non-Oriented Steel Sheets for Finite-Element Method , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[8]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis , 1990, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Soheil Kolouri,et al.  Detecting and visualizing cell phenotype differences from microscopy images using transport-based morphometry , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. S. Sahambi,et al.  Classification of ECG arrhythmias using multi-resolution analysis and neural networks , 2003, TENCON 2003. Conference on Convergent Technologies for Asia-Pacific Region.

[11]  Sebastien Martin,et al.  Nonlinear Electrical Impedance Tomography Reconstruction Using Artificial Neural Networks and Particle Swarm Optimization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[12]  Lei Zhang,et al.  A Novel Earth Mover's Distance Methodology for Image Matching with Gaussian Mixture Models , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[13]  Gustavo K. Rohde,et al.  The Cumulative Distribution Transform and Linear Pattern Classification , 2015, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis.

[14]  B. Brandstatter,et al.  Jacobian calculation for electrical impedance tomography based on the reciprocity principle , 2003 .

[15]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[16]  David S. Holder,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography : Methods, History and Applications , 2004 .

[17]  Gustavo K. Rohde,et al.  A Linear Optimal Transportation Framework for Quantifying and Visualizing Variations in Sets of Images , 2012, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  Naomie Salim,et al.  Arrhythmia recognition and classification using combined linear and nonlinear features of ECG signals , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[19]  Andy Adler,et al.  A primal–dual interior-point framework for using the L1 or L2 norm on the data and regularization terms of inverse problems , 2012 .

[20]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[21]  R. Bracewell The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[22]  J.P. Kaipio,et al.  Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  A Learning-Based Method for Solving Ill-Posed Nonlinear Inverse Problems: A Simulation Study of Lung EIT , 2018, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[24]  S. J. Hamilton,et al.  Deep D-Bar: Real-Time Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging With Deep Neural Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Paavo Rasilo,et al.  Homogenization Technique for Axially Laminated Rotors of Synchronous Reluctance Machines , 2015, IEEE transactions on magnetics.

[26]  Asadollah Shahbahrami,et al.  CLASSIFICATION OF ECG ARRHYTHMIAS USING DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORM AND NEURAL NETWORKS , 2012 .

[27]  David Isaacson,et al.  Reconstructions of chest phantoms by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.