Personalization in E-Government: An Approach that Combines Semantics and Web 2.0

In Europe, large parts of the population use the Internet in their daily life: at work, during their leisure time, or for accessing information, purchasing goods or communication. They now expect public administrations to provide the same level of service that they are accustomed to when using online banking, flight booking or electronic shops. Increasingly, they also expect the types of personalization and user adaptation offered by such commercial services.1 The current norm for e-government portals, which is to confront different citizens with a one-size-fits-all Web interface, is not the optimum way to deliver public sector services because every person is an individual with different knowledge, abilities, skills and preferences. The conventional brick-and-mortar office has a more human face because the clerk can respond to different people in different manners. That is why people tend to use the conventional office rather than the e-government services. To transfer some of the humanity to e-government portals, it is necessary to build adaptive portals for public services. Such user-adaptive portals will increase the usability, and, thus, the acceptance of e-government, enabling administrations to achieve the, as yet, elusive efficiency gains and user satisfaction, which are the primary goals of e-government projects.

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Guerrilla HCI: using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier , 1994 .

[2]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language Reference-W3C Recommen-dation , 2004 .

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[4]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[5]  John D. Gould Chapter 35 – How to Design Usable Systems , 1988 .

[6]  Nenad Stojanovic,et al.  On Enriching Ajax with Semantics: The Web Personalization Use Case , 2007, ESWC.

[7]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  Flavius Frasincar,et al.  Hypermedia Presentation Adaptation on the Semantic Web , 2002, AH.

[9]  L. Stein,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language - Reference , 2004 .

[10]  Michael Eckert,et al.  Reactive Rules on the Web , 2007 .

[11]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  Cost-justifying usability , 2005 .

[12]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering at a discount , 1989 .

[13]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[14]  Tirdad Rahmani,et al.  An User Interface Adaptation Architecture for Rich Internet Applications , 2008, ESWC.

[15]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Prioritizing Web Usability , 2006 .

[16]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  A Roadmap for Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web , 2003, EWMF.

[17]  Jun Ma,et al.  An Approach for Combining Ontology Learning and Semantic Tagging in the Ontology Development Process: eGovernment Use Case , 2007, WISE.

[18]  John D. Gould,et al.  How to design usable systems , 1995 .

[19]  Roland Stühmer,et al.  From Business Rules to Application Rules in Rich Internet Applications , 2008, Scalable Comput. Pract. Exp..

[20]  Anupriya Ankolekar,et al.  Rules for an Ontology-based Approach to Adaptation , 2006, 2006 First International Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP'06).

[21]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  Using Ontologies to Discover Domain-Level Web Usage Profiles , 2002 .

[22]  Steve Krug,et al.  Don't Make Me Think!: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability , 2000 .

[23]  Peter Dolog,et al.  The Personal Reader: Personalizing and Enriching Learning Resources Using Semantic Web Technologies , 2004, AH.

[24]  Michael Eckert,et al.  Reactive Rules on the Web , 2007, Reasoning Web.