Accurate confidence intervals for inter-laboratory calibration and common mean estimation

Abstract For a calibration problem that arises in analytical chemistry, the Rocke-Lorenzato model and some generalizations are considered, so as to capture the near constant variability at very low levels of the analyte, and the increasing measurement variation with increased concentration of the analyte. For the common mean problem, a heteroscedastic one-way random effects model is often used to model the data and will be considered herein. Existing interval estimation procedures for these problems are likelihood based large sample procedures, and are not satisfactory, especially for small samples. A modified likelihood methodology, which can be numerically implemented, is shown to perform very well for the above problems. The analysis of inter-laboratory data is reported in order to illustrate the application of the proposed methods.

[1]  Andrew L. Rukhin,et al.  Confidence Regions and Intervals for Meta-Analysis Model Parameters , 2015, Technometrics.

[2]  Thomas J. DiCiccio,et al.  Simple and accurate one-sided inference from signed roots of likelihood ratios , 2001 .

[3]  Andrew L. Rukhin,et al.  Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of a common mean and the Mandel–Paule algorithm , 2000 .

[4]  David M. Rocke,et al.  A Two-Component Model for Measurement Error in Analytical Chemistry , 1995 .

[5]  Dulal K. Bhaumik,et al.  Confidence Regions for Random-Effects Calibration Curves With Heteroscedastic Errors , 2005, Technometrics.

[6]  Thomas Mathew,et al.  Models and Confidence Intervals for True Values in Interlaboratory Trials , 2004 .

[7]  I. Skovgaard,et al.  An explicit large-deviation approximation to one-parameter tests , 1996 .

[8]  Dulal K. Bhaumik,et al.  Weighted Random-Effects Regression Models With Application to Interlaboratory Calibration , 2001, Technometrics.

[9]  O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Adjusted Versions of Profile Likelihood and Directed Likelihood, and Extended Likelihood , 1994 .

[10]  T. Mathew,et al.  Higher order inference for the consensus mean in inter‐laboratory studies , 2011, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[11]  A. Rukhin,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Analysis for Heteroscedastic One‐Way Random Effects ANOVA in Interlaboratory Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[12]  A. Rukhin,et al.  Estimation of a Common Mean and Weighted Means Statistics , 1998 .

[13]  O. Barndorff-Nielsen Modified signed log likelihood ratio , 1991 .

[14]  O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Infereni on full or partial parameters based on the standardized signed log likelihood ratio , 1986 .

[15]  Chien-Yu Peng,et al.  Student-t Processes for Degradation Analysis , 2020, Technometrics.