Reconciling satellite‐derived atmospheric properties with fine‐resolution land imagery: Insights for atmospheric correction

[1] This paper investigates to what extent satellite measurements of atmospheric properties can be reconciled with fine-resolution land imagery, in order to improve the estimates of surface reflectance through physically based atmospheric correction. The analysis deals with mountainous area (Landsat scene of Peruvian Amazon/Andes, 72°E and 13°S), where the atmosphere is highly variable. Data from satellite sensors were used for characterization of the key atmospheric constituents: total water vapor (TWV), aerosol optical depth (AOD), and total ozone. Constituent time series revealed the season-dependent mean state of the atmosphere and its variability. Discrepancies between AOD from the Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) highlighted substantial uncertainty of atmospheric aerosol properties. The distribution of TWV and AOD over a Landsat scene was found to be exponentially related to ground elevation (mean R2 of 0.82 and 0.29, respectively). In consequence, the atmosphere-induced and seasonally varying bias of the top-of-atmosphere signal was also elevation dependent (e.g., mean Normalized Difference Vegetation Index bias at 500 m was 0.06 and at 4000 m was 0.01). We demonstrate that satellite measurements of key atmospheric constituents can be downscaled and gap filled with the proposed “background + anomalies” approach, to allow for a better compatibility with fine-resolution land surface imagery. Older images (i.e., predating the MODIS/ATSR era), without coincident atmospheric data, can be corrected using climatologies derived from time series of satellite retrievals. Averaging such climatologies over space compromises the quality of correction result to a much greater degree than averaging them over time. We conclude that the quality of both recent and older fine-resolution land surface imagery can be improved with satellite-based atmospheric data acquired to date.

[1]  A. Huete,et al.  Amazon Forests Green-Up During 2005 Drought , 2007, Science.

[2]  T. Eck,et al.  Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land , 2010 .

[3]  Kathleen A. Crean,et al.  Regional aerosol retrieval results from MISR , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  L. Remer,et al.  How small is a small cloud , 2008 .

[5]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  A Method for Unbiased High-Resolution Aerosol Retrieval from Landsat , 2004 .

[6]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[7]  S. Ganguly,et al.  Amazon forests did not green‐up during the 2005 drought , 2009 .

[8]  Qihao Weng,et al.  A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance , 2007 .

[9]  Daniel Schläpfer,et al.  An automatic atmospheric correction algorithm for visible/NIR imagery , 2006 .

[10]  Heikki Saari,et al.  The ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Validation of aerosol extinction and water vapor profiles from routine Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Climate Research Facility measurements , 2009 .

[12]  Richard Siddans,et al.  Oxford-RAL Aerosol and Cloud (ORAC): aerosol retrievals from satellite radiometers , 2009 .

[13]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Review ArticleDigital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review , 2004 .

[14]  R. Myneni,et al.  Atmospheric effects and spectral vegetation indices , 1994 .

[15]  Jun Wang,et al.  Airborne Sun photometer measurements of aerosol optical depth and columnar water vapor during the Puerto Rico Dust Experiment and comparison with land, aircraft, and satellite measurements , 2003 .

[16]  C. Justice,et al.  Atmospheric correction of visible to middle-infrared EOS-MODIS data over land surfaces: Background, operational algorithm and validation , 1997 .

[17]  A. Kokhanovsky,et al.  Aerosol remote sensing over land: A comparison of satellite retrievals using different algorithms and instruments , 2007, Atmospheric Research.

[18]  David D. Turner,et al.  Average aerosol extinction and water vapor profiles over the Southern Great Plains , 2001 .

[19]  W. V. Hoyningen-Huene,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol optical thickness over land surfaces from top‐of‐atmosphere radiance , 2003 .

[20]  Richard Siddans,et al.  Use of MODIS-derived surface reflectance data in the ORAC-AATSR aerosol retrieval algorithm: Impact of differences between sensor spectral response functions , 2012 .

[21]  Randel,et al.  Trends in the vertical distribution of ozone , 1999, Science.

[22]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Benchmark results in vector atmospheric radiative transfer , 2010 .

[24]  Arlin J. Krueger,et al.  A global climatology of total ozone from the Nimbus 7 total ozone mapping spectrometer , 1985 .

[25]  Alexei Lyapustin,et al.  Radiative transfer codes for atmospheric correction and aerosol retrieval: intercomparison study. , 2008, Applied optics.

[26]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Water vapor retrievals using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) near‐infrared channels , 2003 .

[27]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Remote sensing of water vapor in the near IR from EOS/MODIS , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Michael D. King,et al.  Aerosol properties over bright-reflecting source regions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Nicolas Barbier,et al.  Remote sensing detection of droughts in Amazonian forest canopies. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[30]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  3‐D aerosol‐cloud radiative interaction observed in collocated MODIS and ASTER images of cumulus cloud fields , 2007 .

[31]  G. Asner,et al.  Drought impacts on the Amazon forest: the remote sensing perspective. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[32]  C. Körner.  The use of 'altitude' in ecological research. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  I. J. Barton,et al.  AATSR: global-change and surface-temperature measurements from Envisat , 2001 .

[35]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  The atmospheric effect on the separability of field classes measured from satellites , 1985 .

[36]  S. Saatchi,et al.  Fire, climate change and biodiversity in Amazonia: a Late-Holocene perspective , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  E. Vermote,et al.  Validation of a vector version of the 6S radiative transfer code for atmospheric correction of satellite data. Part II. Homogeneous Lambertian and anisotropic surfaces. , 2007, Applied optics.

[38]  Alexis K.H. Lau,et al.  Analysis of aerosol vertical distribution and variability in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[39]  B. Markham,et al.  Summary of Current Radiometric Calibration Coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI Sensors , 2009 .

[40]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  The inter-comparison of major satellite aerosol retrieval algorithms using simulated intensity and polarization characteristics of reflected light , 2009 .