Interaction energy based protein structure networks.

The three-dimensional structure of a protein is formed and maintained by the noncovalent interactions among the amino-acid residues of the polypeptide chain. These interactions can be represented collectively in the form of a network. So far, such networks have been investigated by considering the connections based on distances between the amino-acid residues. Here we present a method of constructing the structure network based on interaction energies among the amino-acid residues in the protein. We have investigated the properties of such protein energy-based networks (PENs) and have shown correlations to protein structural features such as the clusters of residues involved in stability, formation of secondary and super-secondary structural units. Further we demonstrate that the analysis of PENs in terms of parameters such as hubs and shortest paths can provide a variety of biologically important information, such as the residues crucial for stabilizing the folded units and the paths of communication between distal residues in the protein. Finally, the energy regimes for different levels of stabilization in the protein structure have clearly emerged from the PEN analysis.

[1]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allostery: absence of a change in shape does not imply that allostery is not at play. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Variations in clique and community patterns in protein structures during allosteric communication: investigation of dynamically equilibrated structures of methionyl tRNA synthetase complexes. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[3]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[4]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Vibrational Dynamics of Folded Proteins: Significance of Slow and Fast Motions in Relation to Function and Stability , 1998 .

[5]  R. Mathies,et al.  Structural Observation of the Primary Isomerization in Vision with Femtosecond-Stimulated Raman , 2005, Science.

[6]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Residue centrality, functionally important residues, and active site shape: Analysis of enzyme and non‐enzyme families , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  Guang Song,et al.  Protein elastic network models and the ranges of cooperativity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  L. Wyns,et al.  Trimeric domain-swapped barnase. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  B. Matthews,et al.  Evaluation at atomic resolution of the role of strain in destabilizing the temperature‐sensitive T4 lysozyme mutant Arg 96 → His , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  B. Matthews,et al.  The response of T4 lysozyme to large‐to‐small substitutions within the core and its relation to the hydrophobic effect , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The origin of allosteric functional modulation: multiple pre-existing pathways. , 2009, Structure.

[13]  M. Karplus,et al.  Allostery and cooperativity revisited , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A study of communication pathways in methionyl- tRNA synthetase by molecular dynamics simulations and structure network analysis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  L. Hardy,et al.  Genetic analysis of bacteriophage T4 lysozyme structure and function , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  Martin Billeter,et al.  Essential domain motions in barnase revealed by MD simulations , 2002, Proteins.

[17]  B. Matthews,et al.  Methionine and alanine substitutions show that the formation of wild-type-like structure in the carboxy-terminal domain of T4 lysozyme is a rate-limiting step in folding. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[18]  B. Matthews,et al.  Multiple methionine substitutions are tolerated in T4 lysozyme and have coupled effects on folding and stability. , 2003, Biophysical chemistry.

[19]  David A Agard,et al.  Intramolecular signaling pathways revealed by modeling anisotropic thermal diffusion. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  R. Ranganathan,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. , 1999, Science.

[21]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[22]  Victoria A. Higman,et al.  Uncovering network systems within protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Ganesh Bagler,et al.  Network properties of protein structures , 2004, q-bio/0408009.

[24]  S. Bouvier,et al.  Alteration of T4 lysozyme structure by second‐site reversion of deleterious mutations , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  James M. Anderson,et al.  PDZ domains: fundamental building blocks in the organization of protein complexes at the plasma membrane. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[26]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  S. Marqusee,et al.  Subdomain interactions as a determinant in the folding and stability of T4 lysozyme , 1998, Protein Science.

[28]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to T4 lysozyme stability: solvent-exposed charges versus semi-buried salt bridges. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[29]  G. Weber Ligand binding and internal equilibria in proteins. , 1972, Biochemistry.

[30]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Ligand-dependent dynamics and intramolecular signaling in a PDZ domain. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  Understanding protein structure from a percolation perspective. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Paul Schanda,et al.  Direct observation of the dynamic process underlying allosteric signal transmission. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[33]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Intra and inter-molecular communications through protein structure network. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.

[34]  S. Marqusee,et al.  Exploring subdomain cooperativity in T4 lysozyme II: Uncovering the C‐terminal subdomain as a hidden intermediate in the kinetic folding pathway , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[35]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  Random network behaviour of protein structures. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[36]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of energetic and dynamic coupling networks in a PDZ domain protein. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  C. Anfinsen Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[39]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Coarse-grained biomolecular simulation with REACH: realistic extension algorithm via covariance Hessian. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[40]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[41]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[42]  M. Karplus,et al.  Signaling pathways of PDZ2 domain: A molecular dynamics interaction correlation analysis , 2009, Proteins.

[43]  D. Leitner Energy flow in proteins. , 2008, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[44]  K. Sharp,et al.  Pump‐probe molecular dynamics as a tool for studying protein motion and long range coupling , 2006, Proteins.

[45]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Long-range energy transfer in proteins , 2009, Physical biology.

[46]  I. Bahar,et al.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[47]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[48]  Geerten W Vuister,et al.  Structure, dynamics and binding characteristics of the second PDZ domain of PTP-BL. , 2002, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[49]  Giovanni Dietler,et al.  Functional dynamics of PDZ binding domains: a normal-mode analysis. , 2005, Biophysical journal.