How reliable is the monitoring of permanent vegetation plots? A test with multiple observers

Abstract Questions: A multiple plot design was developed for permanent vegetation plots. How reliable are the different methods used in this design and which changes can we measure ? Location: Alpine meadows (2430 m a.s.l.) in the Swiss Alps. Methods: Four inventories were obtained from 40 m2 plots: four subplots (0.4 m2) with a list of species, two 10m transects with the point method (50 points on each), one subplot (4m2) with a list of species and visual cover estimates as a percentage and the complete plot (40 m2) with a list of species and visual estimates in classes. This design was tested by five to seven experienced botanists in three plots. Results: Whatever the sampling size, only 45–63% of the species were seen by all the observers. However, the majority of the overlooked species had cover < 0.1%. Pairs of observers overlooked 10–20% less species than single observers. The point method was the best method for cover estimate, but it took much longer than visual cover estimates, and 100 points allowed for the monitoring of only a very limited number of species. The visual estimate as a percentage was more precise than classes. Working in pairs did not improve the estimates, but one botanist repeating the survey is more reliable than a succession of different observers. Conclusion: Lists of species are insufficient for monitoring. It is necessary to add cover estimates to allow for subsequent interpretations in spite of the overlooked species. The choice of the method depends on the available resources: the point method is time consuming but gives precise data for a limited number of species, while visual estimates are quick but allow for recording only large changes in cover. Constant pairs of observers improve the reliability of the records. Nomenclature: Aeschimann et al. (1996).

[1]  Pascal Vittoz,et al.  Effects of Climate and Land-Use Change on the Establishment and Growth of Cembran Pine (Pinus cembra L.) over the Altitudinal Treeline Ecotone in the Central Swiss Alps , 2008 .

[2]  M. Cappellini,et al.  CO-ORDINATING EDITOR , 2008 .

[3]  R. Chevalier,et al.  Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses , 2006 .

[4]  M. Sykes,et al.  Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Guisan,et al.  Monitoring Networks for Testing Model-Based Scenarios of Climate Change Impact on Mountain Plant Distribution , 2005 .

[6]  A. MacDougall,et al.  ARE INVASIVE SPECIES THE DRIVERS OR PASSENGERS OF CHANGE IN DEGRADED ECOSYSTEMS , 2005 .

[7]  C. Stevens,et al.  Impact of Nitrogen Deposition on the Species Richness of Grasslands , 2004, Science.

[8]  D. J. Helm,et al.  Reproducibility of vegetation cover estimates in south-central Alaska forests , 2004 .

[9]  W. Scott,et al.  Assessing species misidentification rates through quality assurance of vegetation monitoring , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[10]  T. Stohlgren,et al.  A Modified-Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method , 1995, Vegetatio.

[11]  Precision in monitoring plant species composition in montane grasslands , 1990, Vegetatio.

[12]  C. Everson,et al.  A comparison of six methods of botanical analysis in the montane grasslands of Natal , 1987, Vegetatio.

[13]  T. Stohlgren,et al.  Monitoring shifts in plant diversity in response to climate change: a method for landscapes , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[14]  L. Klimeš,et al.  Scale-dependent variation in visual estimates of grassland plant cover , 2003 .

[15]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover , 2003 .

[16]  Stefan Dullinger,et al.  A regional impact assessment of climate and land‐use change on alpine vegetation , 2003 .

[17]  P. Vittoz,et al.  Das Projekt PERMANENT.PLOT.CH bittet um Ihre Mithilfe , 2003 .

[18]  R. Leemans,et al.  Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050 , 2002 .

[19]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[20]  J. Schmill,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL SERIES No . 342 Nature and Landscape Biodiversity Monitoring in Switzerland BDM Interim Report , 2002 .

[21]  T. Kučera,et al.  Scale‐dependent biases in species counts in a grassland , 2001 .

[22]  A. Guisan,et al.  Potential Impact of Climate Change on Vegetation in the European Alps: A Review , 2001 .

[23]  R. Motta,et al.  Growth trends and dynamics in sub‐alpine forest stands in the Varaita Valley (Piedmont, Italy) and their relationships with human activities and global change , 2001 .

[24]  A. Guisan,et al.  Assessing alpine plant vulnerability to climate change: a modeling perspective , 2000 .

[25]  Hees,et al.  Ocular estimates of understory vegetation structure in a closed Picea glauca/Betula papyrifera forest , 2000 .

[26]  C. Körner,et al.  In situ effects of elevated CO2 on the carbon and nitrogen status of alpine plants , 1997 .

[27]  D. G. George,et al.  The United Kingdom Environmental Change Network: Protocols for standard measurements at terrestrial sites , 1996 .

[28]  G. Grabherr,et al.  Climate effects on mountain plants , 1994, Nature.

[29]  Jan Lepš,et al.  How reliable are our vegetation analyses , 1992 .

[30]  K. A. Kennedy,et al.  SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE USE OF VISUAL ESTIMATES OF PLANT COVER IN BIOMONITORING , 1987 .

[31]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Experimental Estimates of Census Efficiency and Pseudoturnover on Islands: Error Trend and Between-Observer Variation when Recording Vascular Plants , 1985 .

[32]  J. M. Sykes,et al.  USE OF VISUAL COVER ASSESSMENTS AS QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATORS OF SOME BRITISH WOODLAND TAXA , 1983 .

[33]  O. Järvinen.  Conservation of Endangered Plant Populations: Single Large or Several Small Reserves? , 1982 .

[34]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[35]  F. Fukarek.  Pflanzensoziologie , 1964 .

[36]  J. Braun-Blanquet,et al.  Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde. , 1967 .

[37]  A. D. Smith,et al.  A Study of the Reliability of Range Vegatation Estimates , 1944 .