The impact of goal-oriented task design on neurofeedback learning for brain–computer interface control

AbstractNeurofeedback training teaches individuals to modulate brain activity by providing real-time feedback and can be used for brain–computer interface control. The present study aimed to optimize training by maximizing engagement through goal-oriented task design. Participants were shown either a visual display or a robot, where each was manipulated using motor imagery (MI)-related electroencephalography signals. Those with the robot were instructed to quickly navigate grid spaces, as the potential for goal-oriented design to strengthen learning was central to our investigation. Both groups were hypothesized to show increased magnitude of these signals across 10 sessions, with the greatest gains being seen in those navigating the robot due to increased engagement. Participants demonstrated the predicted increase in magnitude, with no differentiation between hemispheres. Participants navigating the robot showed stronger left-hand MI increases than those with the computer display. This is likely due to success being reliant on maintaining strong MI-related signals. While older participants showed stronger signals in early sessions, this trend later reversed, suggesting greater natural proficiency but reduced flexibility. These results demonstrate capacity for modulating neurofeedback using MI over a series of training sessions, using tasks of varied design. Importantly, the more goal-oriented robot control task resulted in greater improvements.

[1]  Frank Masterpasqua,et al.  Neurofeedback in Psychological Practice. , 2003 .

[2]  Kymberly D. Young,et al.  Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training of Amygdala Activity in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Catie Chang,et al.  Effects of salience-network-node neurofeedback training on affective biases in major depressive disorder , 2016, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[5]  F. Rabiee,et al.  The Effect of Neurofeedback Therapy on Reducing Symptoms Associated with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Case Series Study , 2016, Basic and clinical neuroscience.

[6]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Could the beta rebound in the EEG be suitable to realize a “brain switch”? , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  Javier Gomez-Pilar,et al.  Neurofeedback training with a motor imagery-based BCI: neurocognitive improvements and EEG changes in the elderly , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  Sabrina M. Tom,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Schuster,et al.  Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial , 2012, Trials.

[10]  Benjamin V. Tucker,et al.  The effects of N-gram probabilistic measures on the recognition and production of four-word sequences , 2011 .

[11]  Gary F. Egan,et al.  Long-term motor training induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow in both task and resting states , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  P. Strick,et al.  Extended Practice of a Motor Skill Is Associated with Reduced Metabolic Activity in M1 , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  B. Ross,et al.  Attention modulates beta oscillations during prolonged tactile stimulation , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[15]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Skill learning strengthens cortical representations of motor sequences , 2013, eLife.

[16]  J. van os,et al.  Neurofeedback As a Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder – A Pilot Study , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Marie Johnston,et al.  Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Timothy Bardouille,et al.  Laterality of brain activity during motor imagery is modulated by the provision of source level neurofeedback , 2014, NeuroImage.

[19]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  Changes in regional activity are accompanied with changes in inter-regional connectivity during 4 weeks motor learning , 2010, Brain Research.

[20]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mental imaging of motor activity in humans , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  Julien Doyon,et al.  Cerebellum and M1 interaction during early learning of timed motor sequences , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. Barillari,et al.  Mental practice is effective in upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized single-blind cross-over study. , 2010, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  Teresa Sousa,et al.  Control of Brain Activity in hMT+/V5 at Three Response Levels Using fMRI-Based Neurofeedback/BCI , 2016, PloS one.

[25]  Muhammad Abd-El-Barr,et al.  Long-term Training With a Brain-Machine Interface-Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients. , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[26]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[27]  R. Passingham,et al.  The Time Course of Changes during Motor Sequence Learning: A Whole-Brain fMRI Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[28]  C. Richards,et al.  Added Value of Mental Practice Combined with a Small Amount of Physical Practice on the Relearning of Rising and Sitting Post-Stroke: A Pilot Study , 2009, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[29]  Melanie Kleynen,et al.  Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework , 2008, Clinical rehabilitation.

[30]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Involvement of Primary Motor Cortex in Motor Imagery: A Neuromagnetic Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[31]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  Multimodal functional imaging of motor imagery using a novel paradigm , 2013, NeuroImage.

[32]  Feng Wan,et al.  Alpha neurofeedback training improves SSVEP-based BCI performance , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[33]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[34]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Beta rebound after different types of motor imagery in man , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  M. Farah The neural basis of mental imagery , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  Sarah N. Kraeutner,et al.  Motor imagery-based brain activity parallels that of motor execution: Evidence from magnetic source imaging of cortical oscillations , 2014, Brain Research.

[37]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of mental navigation in blind and sighted people , 2014, Behavioural Brain Research.