New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner‐city neighborhoods

Abstract New Urbanism has been described as the most influential movement in architecture and planning in the United States since the Modernist movement. In recent years, New Urbanist design principles have been adopted for many housing and neighborhood planning efforts. This article considers the applications and implications of New Urbanism for distressed inner‐city neighborhoods. Claims and criticisms of New Urbanism are examined and the long‐standing debates over the extent to which physical planning and design can affect human behavior are revisited. The article concludes that New Urbanism is not a panacea, but that its design principles are consistent with broader policies aimed at revitalizing and improving living conditions and opportunities for inner‐city residents. New Urbanism needs to be viewed as one strategy to be integrated within the larger array of economic, social, and community development programs attempting to revitalize and improve the quality of life in inner‐city neighborhoods.

[1]  E. Talen.  Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism , 1999 .

[2]  Léon Krier,et al.  Architecture: Choice or Fate , 1998 .

[3]  Joongsub Kim.  Creating Community: Does the Kentlands Live up to Its Goals? , 2000 .

[4]  Bob Bernotas.  The Department of Housing and Urban Development , 1991 .

[5]  Dennis W. Graber,et al.  National Association of Home Builders , 2022 .

[6]  Alex Krieger,et al.  Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk : towns and town-making principles , 1991 .

[7]  Elvin K. Wyly,et al.  Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification , 1999 .

[8]  Ivonne Audirac,et al.  Ideal Urban Form and Visions of the Good Life Florida's Growth Management Dilemma , 1990 .

[9]  Willem Van Vliet,et al.  Handbook of housing and the built environment in the United States , 1988 .

[10]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[11]  Ervin H. Zube,et al.  Advance in Environment, Behavior, and Design , 1989, Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design.

[12]  Stephen Steinberg,et al.  The Gans-Ian Bridge between Social Science and Social Policy@@@People, Plans, and Policies: Essays on Poverty, Racism, and Other National Urban Problems. , 1992 .

[13]  D. Kelbaugh.  The Pedestrian pocket book : a new suburban design strategy , 1996 .

[14]  O. Newman,et al.  Defensible Space; Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. , 1973 .

[15]  W. Whyte.  City: Rediscovering the Center , 1988 .

[16]  R. Golledge,et al.  Environmental Knowing: Theories, Research and Methods , 1978 .

[17]  P. Marcuse.  Comment on Elvin K. Wyly and Daniel J. Hammel's “Islands of Decay in Seas of Renewal: Housing Policy and the Resurgence of Gentrification” , 1999 .

[18]  Oscar Newman,et al.  Creating defensible space , 1996 .

[19]  A. Christoforidis.  New Alternatives to the Suburb: Neo-Traditional Developments , 1994 .

[20]  S. B. Warner.  Streetcar Suburbs: The Process of Growth in Boston, 1870-1900 , 1962 .

[21]  David V. Canter,et al.  The Facets of Place , 1997 .

[22]  D. Walmsley,et al.  Urban Living: The Individual in the City , 1988 .

[23]  G. Galster,et al.  Threshold effects and the expected benefits of attracting middle‐income households to the central city , 1997 .

[24]  Herbert J. Gans,et al.  The Urban Villagers , 1962 .

[25]  X. Briggs.  Moving Up versus Moving Out: Neighborhood Effects in Housing Mobility Programs , 1997 .

[26]  Karen E. Till,et al.  Neotraditional Towns and Urban Villages: The Cultural Production of a Geography of ‘Otherness’ , 1993 .

[27]  Jerry J. Salama,et al.  The redevelopment of distressed public housing: Early results from HOPE VI projects in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Antonio , 1999 .

[28]  R. Lang,et al.  Restoring community through traditional neighborhood design: A case study of Diggs town public housing , 1998 .

[29]  Daniel Solomon,et al.  Redesigning the American Dream@@@ReBuilding@@@Local Code: The Constitution of a City at 42 N Latitude@@@The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community and the American Dream@@@Visions for a New American Dream: Process, Principles, and an Ordinance to Plan and Design Small Communities , 1995 .

[30]  A. Schnare,et al.  “… And a suitable living environment”: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality , 1997 .

[31]  Harry Heft.  The Relevance of Gibson’s Ecological Approach to Perception for Environment-Behavior Studies , 1997 .

[32]  D. Gans.  People and plans , 1968 .

[33]  Camilo Vergara.  The new American ghetto , 1995 .

[34]  J. F. Bauman.  Public Housing: The Dreadful Saga of a Durable Policy , 1994 .

[35]  Karen A. Franck,et al.  The effects of building size on personal crime and fear of crime , 1982 .

[36]  H. Donald.  Comment on Sandra J. Newman and Ann B. Schnare's “'… And a suitable living environment’: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality” , 1997 .

[37]  J. Lang,et al.  Urban Design: The American Experience , 1994 .

[38]  C. Marcus.  House As a Mirror of Self : Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home , 1995 .

[39]  S. Fainstein.  New Directions in Planning Theory , 2000 .

[40]  Robert D. Yaro,et al.  A Region at Risk: The Third Regional Plan For The New York-New Jersey-Connecticut Metropolitan Area , 1996 .

[41]  Ivonne Audirac,et al.  An Evaluation of Neotraditional Design's Social Prescription: Postmodern Placebo or Remedy for Suburban Malaise? , 1994 .

[42]  J. Kasarda.  Comment on Elvin K. Wyly and Daniel J. Hammel's “Islands of Decay in Seas of Renewal: Housing Policy and the Resurgence of Gentrication” , 1999 .

[43]  R. Ewing.  Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable? , 1997 .

[44]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of the Inner City , 1995 .

[45]  H. Gans,et al.  People and Plans: Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions. , 1969 .

[46]  D. Canter.  The psychology of place , 1977 .

[47]  A. Moudon,et al.  Proof of Goodness: A Substantive Basis for New Urbanism [The Promise of New Urbanism] , 2000 .

[48]  J. Jacobs.  The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[49]  Randall G. Arendt,et al.  Charter of the New Urbanism , 1999 .

[50]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[51]  H. Gans.  People and Plans: Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions , 1969 .

[52]  John C. Weaver,et al.  A History of Housing in New York City , 1993 .

[53]  John F. Kain,et al.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later , 1992 .

[54]  Michael Pyatok.  Martha Stewart vs. Studs Terkel? New Urbanism and Inner Cities Neighborhoods that Work , 2000 .

[55]  Lawrence J. Vale.  Public housing and the American dream: Residents’ views on buying into “the projects” , 1998 .

[56]  P. Calthorpe.  The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream , 1993 .

[57]  P. Gordon,et al.  Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal , 1997 .

[58]  Jeanne M. Plas,et al.  Environmental factors and sense of community in a planned town , 1996 .

[59]  P. Katz.  The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community , 1993 .