Of Pins and Tweets: Investigating How Users Behave Across Image- and Text-Based Social Networks

Today, it is the norm for online social (OSN) users to have accounts on multiple services. For example, a recent study showed that 34% of all Twitter users also use Pinterest. This situation leads to interesting questions such as: Are the activities that users perform on each site disjoint? Alternatively, if users perform the same actions on multiple sites, where does the information originate? Given the interlinking between social networks, failure to understand activity across multiple sites may obfuscate the true information dissemination dynamics of the social web. In this study, we take the first steps towards a more complete understanding of user behavior across multiple OSNs. We collect a sample of over 30,000 users that have accounts on both Twitter and Pinterest, crawling their profile information and activity on a daily basis for a period of almost three months. We develop a novel methodology for comparing activity across these two sites. We find that the global patterns of use across the two sites differ significantly, and that users tend to post items to Pinterest before posting them on Twitter. Our findings can inform the understanding of the behavior of users on individual sites, as well as the dynamics of sharing across the social web.

[1]  Alok N. Choudhary,et al.  Twitter Trending Topic Classification , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[2]  Brian D. Davison,et al.  Empirical study of topic modeling in Twitter , 2010, SOMA '10.

[3]  Ramesh Nallapati,et al.  Labeled LDA: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora , 2009, EMNLP.

[4]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[5]  Kevin Duh,et al.  Creating Stories: Social Curation of Twitter Messages , 2012, ICWSM.

[6]  R. M. Tobin,et al.  Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. , 2007, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Ladies First: Analyzing Gender Roles and Behaviors in Pinterest , 2013, ICWSM.

[8]  David A. Padua,et al.  Estimating cache misses and locality using stack distances , 2003, ICS '03.

[9]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Characterizing Microblogs with Topic Models , 2010, ICWSM.

[10]  Загоровская Ольга Владимировна,et al.  Исследование влияния пола и психологических характеристик автора на количественные параметры его текста с использованием программы Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count , 2015 .

[11]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Characterizing reference locality in the WWW , 1996, Fourth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems.

[12]  Haya Bechar-Israeli From to : Nicknames, Play and Identity on Internet Relay Chat. , 1995 .

[13]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  I pinned it. where can i buy one like it?: automatically linking pinterest pins to online webshops , 2013, DUBMOD '13.

[14]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Crowdsourcing performance evaluations of user interfaces , 2013, CHI.

[15]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  No country for old members: user lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities , 2013, WWW.

[16]  Nishanth R. Sastry,et al.  Sharing the Loves: Understanding the How and Why of Online Content Curation , 2013, ICWSM.

[17]  Cindy K. Chung,et al.  The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007 , 2007 .

[18]  J. Suler Identity Management in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[19]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  TweetLDA: supervised topic classification and link prediction in Twitter , 2012, WebSci '12.

[20]  Haya Bechar-Israeli,et al.  From "Bonehead" to "cLoNehEAd": Nicknames, Play and Identity on Internet Relay Chat , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Hongfei Yan,et al.  Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models , 2011, ECIR.

[22]  Yong Yu,et al.  An Empirical Study of User Behaviors on Pinterest Social Network , 2013, 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT).