Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Ultrasound in Breast Cancer

Objective To determine the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and DCE ultrasound (DCE-US) for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods This Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study was performed between 2014 and 2016. Thirty-nine women with breast cancer underwent DCE-US and DCE-MRI before the NAC, follow-up DCE-US after the first cycle of NAC, and follow-up DCE-MRI after the second cycle of NAC. DCE-MRI parameters (transfer constant [Ktrans], reverse constant [kep], and leakage space [Ve]) were assessed with histograms. From DCE-US, peak-enhancement, the area under the curve, wash-in rate, wash-out rate, time to peak, and rise time (RT) were obtained. After surgery, all the imaging parameters and their changes were compared with histopathologic response using the Miller-Payne Grading (MPG) system. Data from minor and good responders were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for assessing diagnostic performance to predict good response. Results Twelve patients (30.8%) showed a good response (MPG 4 or 5) and 27 (69.2%) showed a minor response (MPG 1–3). The mean, 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of Ktrans and Kep of post-NAC DCE-MRI differed between the two groups. These parameters showed fair to good diagnostic performance for the prediction of response to NAC (AUC 0.76–0.81, p ≤ 0.007). Among DCE-US parameters, the percentage change in RT showed fair prediction (AUC 0.71, p = 0.023). Conclusion Quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI and DCE-US was helpful for early prediction of response to NAC.

[1]  Mary W. Yamashita,et al.  Accuracy of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer , 2017, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  J. Bergh,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in assessing early response among patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2017, Acta Radiologica.

[3]  Min-Sun Jin,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Perfusion Parameters as Imaging Biomarkers of Angiogenesis , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  C. Park,et al.  Pathologic Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy , 2016, Journal of pathology and translational medicine.

[5]  Wei Huang,et al.  Early Prediction and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Quantitative DCE-MRI1 , 2016, Translational oncology.

[6]  Yeon-Hee Park,et al.  Prognostic Significance of a Complete Response on Breast MRI in Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy According to the Molecular Subtype , 2015, Korean journal of radiology.

[7]  F. Zink,et al.  Comparison of Two High-End Ultrasound Systems for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantification of Mural Microvascularity in Crohn’s Disease , 2015, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[8]  Amy C. Dwyer,et al.  Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review. , 2014, Medical physics.

[9]  N. Just,et al.  Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Xia Li,et al.  DCE‐MRI analysis methods for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Pilot study findings , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Etsuo Takada,et al.  Efficacy of sonazoid (perflubutane) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of focal breast lesions: phase 3 multicenter clinical trial. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Y. Jeong,et al.  Pre-Treatment Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Predicting Tumor Recurrence in Uterine Cervical Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiation: Value of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients , 2013, Korean journal of radiology.

[13]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Potential application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  N Houssami,et al.  Early prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: systematic review of the accuracy of MRI. , 2012, Breast.

[15]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Pre-treatment differences and early response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review , 2012, European Radiology.

[16]  C. Dietrich,et al.  An EFSUMB Introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for Quantification of Tumour Perfusion , 2012, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[17]  M Arditi,et al.  Perfusion Quantification in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) – Ready for Research Projects and Routine Clinical Use , 2012, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[18]  A. Padhani,et al.  Tumor response assessments with diffusion and perfusion MRI , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Jing Du,et al.  Enhancement patterns and parameters of breast cancers at contrast-enhanced US: correlation with prognostic factors. , 2012, Radiology.

[20]  W. Moon,et al.  Computer-Aided Evaluation of Breast MRI for the Residual Tumor Extent and Response Monitoring in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2011, Korean journal of radiology.

[21]  P. Torricelli,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI , 2010, European Radiology.

[22]  B. Corcioni,et al.  Contrast-enhanced US and MRI for assessing the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy(). , 2008, Journal of ultrasound.

[23]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Early Changes in Functional Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict for Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  Carmel Hayes,et al.  Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical results. , 2006, Radiology.

[26]  A. Padhani,et al.  Perfusion MR Imaging of Extracranial Tumor Angiogenesis , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[27]  A. Hutcheon,et al.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. , 2003, Breast.

[28]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Continuous low-dose anti-angiogenic/ metronomic chemotherapy: from the research laboratory into the oncology clinic. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[29]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Parametric Response , 2015 .

[32]  N. Lassau,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves. , 2012, Ultrasonics.