Adaptive force produced by stress-induced regulation of random variation intensity

The Darwinian theory of life evolution is capable of explaining the majority of related phenomena. At the same time, the mechanisms of optimizing traits beneficial to a population as a whole but not directly to an individual remain largely unclear. There are also significant problems with explaining the phenomenon of punctuated equilibrium. From another perspective, multiple mechanisms for the regulation of the rate of genetic mutations according to the environmental stress have been discovered, but their precise functional role is not well understood yet. Here a novel mathematical paradigm called a Kinetic-Force Principle (KFP), which can serve as a general basis for biologically plausible optimization methods, is introduced and its rigorous derivation is provided. Based on this principle, it is shown that, if the rate of random changes in a biological system is proportional, even only roughly, to the amount of environmental stress, a virtual force is created, acting in the direction of stress relief. It is demonstrated that KFP can provide important insights into solving the above problems. Evidence is presented in support of a hypothesis that the nature employs KFP for accelerating adaptation in biological systems. A detailed comparison between KFP and the principle of variation and natural selection is presented and their complementarity is revealed. It is concluded that KFP is not a competing alternative, but a powerful addition to the principle of variation and natural selection. It is also shown KFP can be used in multiple ways for adaptation of individual biological organisms.

[1]  A. J. Noordwijk Futuyma, D. J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology 2nd edition, Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, Mass. , 1988 .

[2]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress , 1991 .

[3]  I. Maclennan,et al.  Mechanism of antigen-driven selection in germinal centres , 1989, Nature.

[4]  P. Foster Stress-Induced Mutagenesis in Bacteria , 2007, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[5]  S. Gould,et al.  Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism , 1972 .

[6]  B. Mcclintock,et al.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. , 1984, Science.

[7]  A S Perelson,et al.  Modeling and optimization of populations subject to time-dependent mutation. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Rosenberg Evolving responsively: adaptive mutation , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  T. Smith,et al.  Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations , 2005 .

[10]  R. Lenski,et al.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli , 1997, Nature.

[11]  David Metzgar,et al.  Evidence for the Adaptive Evolution of Mutation Rates , 2000, Cell.

[12]  J. Miller,et al.  Proliferation of mutators in A cell population , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  Ramit Mehr,et al.  Immune system learning and memory quantified by graphical analysis of B-lymphocyte phylogenetic trees. , 2004, Bio Systems.

[14]  I. Meilijson,et al.  Maturation of the humoral immune response as an optimization problem , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  The evolutionary origin of complex features , 2003, Nature.

[16]  J. Ryals,et al.  Pathogen stress increases somatic recombination frequency in Arabidopsis , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[17]  T. Schopf Models in Paleobiology , 1972 .

[18]  C. Darwin Charles Darwin The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2004 .

[19]  D. Winter,et al.  Dual enigma of somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin variable genes: targeting and mechanism , 1998, Immunological reviews.

[20]  P. Foster Adaptive mutation: implications for evolution , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[21]  V. Wee Yong,et al.  Metalloproteinases in biology and pathology of the nervous system , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  T. Nagylaki Introduction to Theoretical Population Genetics , 1992 .

[23]  L. Caporale Mutation is modulated: implications for evolution. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[24]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[25]  C. Berek,et al.  Development of antibody diversity in single germinal centers: selective expansion of high‐affinity variants , 1994, European journal of immunology.

[26]  C. Milstein,et al.  Somatic hypermutation. , 1995, Current opinion in immunology.

[27]  S. Gould The Structure of Evolutionary Theory , 2002 .

[28]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[29]  T. Johnson,et al.  The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[30]  Yury P. Shimansky,et al.  Biologically plausible learning in neural networks: a lesson from bacterial chemotaxis , 2009, Biological Cybernetics.