Pneumatic-type surgical robot end-effector for laparoscopic surgical-operation-by-wire

BackgroundAlthough minimally invasive surgery (MIS) affords several advantages compared to conventional open surgery, robotic MIS systems still have many limitations. One of the limitations is the non-uniform gripping force due to mechanical strings of the existing systems. To overcome this limitation, a surgical instrument with a pneumatic gripping system consisting of a compressor, catheter balloon, micro motor, and other parts is developed.MethodThis study aims to implement a surgical instrument with a pneumatic gripping system and pitching/yawing joints using micro motors and without mechanical strings based on the surgical-operation-by-wire (SOBW) concept. A 6-axis external arm for increasing degrees of freedom (DOFs) is integrated with the surgical instrument using LabVIEW® for laparoscopic procedures. The gripping force is measured over a wide range of pressures and compared with the simulated ideal step function. Furthermore, a kinematic analysis is conducted. To validate and evaluate the system’s clinical applicability, a simple peg task experiment and workspace identification experiment are performed with five novice volunteers using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) board kit. The master interface of the proposed system employs the hands-on-throttle-and-stick (HOTAS) controller used in aerospace engineering. To develop an improved HOTAS (iHOTAS) controller, 6-axis force/torque sensor was integrated in the special housing.ResultsThe mean gripping force (after 1,000 repetitions) at a pressure of 0.3 MPa was measured to be 5.8 N. The reaction time was found to be 0.4 s, which is almost real-time. All novice volunteers could complete the simple peg task within a mean time of 176 s, and none of them exceeded the 300 s cut-off time. The system’s workspace was calculated to be 11,157.0 cm3.ConclusionsThe proposed pneumatic gripping system provides a force consistent with that of other robotic MIS systems. It provides near real-time control. It is more durable than the existing other surgical robot systems. Its workspace is sufficient for clinical surgery. Therefore, the proposed system is expected to be widely used for laparoscopic robotic surgery. This research using iHOTAS will be applied to the tactile force feedback system for surgeon’s safe operation.

[1]  Peter K. Allen,et al.  Design, simulation and evaluation of kinematic alternatives for Insertable Robotic Effectors Platforms in Single Port Access Surgery , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  G Hirzinger,et al.  Development of actuated and sensor integrated forceps for minimally invasive robotic surger , 2005, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[3]  Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Master-Slave Control of a Teleoperated Anthropomorphic Robotic Arm with Gripping Force Sensing , 2005, IMTC 2005.

[4]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Raven-II: An Open Platform for Surgical Robotics Research , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  N. P. Reddy,et al.  Forces in surgical tools: comparison between laparoscopic and surgical forceps , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Zafer Bingul,et al.  Robot Kinematics: Forward and Inverse Kinematics , 2006 .

[7]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Stabilization for the compliant humanoid robot COMAN exploiting intrinsic and controlled compliance , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Gourab Sen Gupta,et al.  Master–Slave Control of a Teleoperated Anthropomorphic Robotic Arm With Gripping Force Sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[9]  R. P. G. Collinson.  Fly‐By‐Wire Flight Control , 1978 .

[10]  Cagatay Candan,et al.  A unified framework for derivation and implementation of Savitzky-Golay filters , 2014, Signal Process..

[11]  Chao He,et al.  Workspace analysis based port placement planning in robotic-assisted cholecystectomy , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education.

[12]  Barbara L. Bass,et al.  “Chopstick” surgery: a novel technique improves surgeon performance and eliminates arm collision in robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Bernhard Kübler,et al.  Development of actuated and sensor integrated forceps for minimally invasive robotic surgery , 2006 .

[14]  William J. Peine,et al.  Design of an endoluminal NOTES robotic system , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  FIMechE,et al.  Fly by wire control system , 1972 .

[16]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  A statically balanced and bi-stable compliant end effector combined with a laparoscopic 2DoF robotic arm , 2012 .

[17]  Shane Farritor,et al.  Single-Site Colectomy With Miniature In Vivo Robotic Platform , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  M. Bromba,et al.  Application hints for Savitzky-Golay digital smoothing filters , 1981 .

[19]  Silvia Schievano,et al.  Simulation of Stent Deployment in a Realistic Human Coronary Artery , 2008 .

[20]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Design of a Compact Robotic Manipulator for Single-Port Laparoscopy , 2014 .

[21]  G. Sung,et al.  Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems. , 2001, Urology.

[22]  R.P.G. Collinson,et al.  Fly‐By‐Wire Flight Control , 1978 .

[23]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  Differences in grip forces among various robotic instruments and da Vinci surgical platforms. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[24]  Won-Ho Shin,et al.  Surgical Robot System for Single-Port Surgery With Novel Joint Mechanism , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  F. Pirozzi,et al.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[26]  N. P. Reddy,et al.  Towards force feedback in laparoscopic surgical tools , 1994, Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Nabeel A. Arain,et al.  Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. , 2012, Surgery.

[28]  Joanne Bechta Dugan,et al.  Reliability evaluation of fly-by-wire computer systems , 1994, J. Syst. Softw..

[29]  L. Andrade,et al.  Design of Boeing 777 electric system , 1992, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[30]  A. Lanfranco,et al.  Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[31]  Nicole D. Bouvy,et al.  The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[32]  Carl A. Nelson,et al.  A Cable-Driven Grasper With Decoupled Motion and Forces , 2014 .

[33]  B. Kang,et al.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery , 2012, Journal of gastric cancer.