Storm Event and Continuous Modeling of an Illinois Watershed to Evaluate Surface Water Supplies

Based on recent reviews of leading watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models, the long-term continuous model SWAT was selected to enhance with storm event simulation algorithms from a storm event model to be used as a source-water protection and assessment tool for small public water supply systems. This enhanced SWAT will simulate hydrology, soil erosion, and transport of sediment and agrochemicals during storm events with short time intervals (minutes or hours) to capture rapid changes, especially during severe events causing most of the environmental damages, in addition to long-term simulations with longer time intervals (days, months, and years) while studying long-term impacts. The 8,400 km2 Little Wabash River watershed in Illinois was selected for this study because of its favorable small drinking water supply and watershed attributes. Using multi-year period (1995-2002) of observed precipitation, stream flow, and concentrations of sediment and water quality data, the continuous model is being calibrated and validated. Established statistical indicators (coefficient of determination and Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient) are used to measure and improve model predictions. Using storm event rainfall and flow data at smaller (15 minute) time intervals, the storm event hydrology model is also being calibrated and validated. The calibrated and validated model will be used for both long-term and storm event water quantity and quality evaluations throughout the watershed, including at intakes of small public water supply systems under existing and alternative land use and management practices. Flow calibration results at an upstream station reveal that the storm event hydrology model with less parameter predicts more accurate flows, especially peak flows, than the continuous daily model.

[1]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  Deva K. Borah,et al.  Kinematic wave routing incorporating shock fitting , 1980 .

[3]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Flux and Sources of Nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin , 1999 .

[4]  K. Warner Analysis of nutrients, selected inorganic constituents, and trace elements in water from Illinois community-supply wells, 1984-91 , 2000 .

[5]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[6]  A. T. Hjelmfelt,et al.  Hydrology for Engineers and Planners , 1975 .

[7]  A. Saleh,et al.  EVALUATION OF SWAT AND HSPF WITHIN BASINS PROGRAM FOR THE UPPER NORTH BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED IN CENTRAL TEXAS , 2004 .

[8]  J. Parlange,et al.  A parameter‐efficient hydrologic infiltration model , 1978 .

[9]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Regional Climate Model Simulation of U.S. Precipitation during 1982–2002. Part I: Annual Cycle , 2004 .

[10]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION ON AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS: CHOOSING BETWEEN TWO MODELS , 2003 .

[11]  Illinois.,et al.  Critical trends in Illinois ecosystems , 2001 .

[12]  飯塚 敏夫,et al.  洪水追跡法(Flood routing) , 1953 .

[13]  J. Eimers,et al.  Methods of rating unsaturated zone and watershed characteristics of public water supplies in North Carolina , 2000 .

[14]  J. D. Eigel,et al.  Modeling Surface and Subsurface Stormflow on Steeply-Sloping Forested Watersheds , 1983 .

[15]  Harold H. Sanguinetti HYDROLOGY , 1923 .

[16]  Renjie Xia,et al.  Storm event flow and sediment simulations in agricultural watersheds using DWSM , 2004 .

[17]  Walnut Point Lake Illinois 2004 Section 303(d) List , 2004 .

[18]  C. Reinhardt,et al.  Water resources of southern Illinois , 1946 .

[19]  Nani G. Bhowmik,et al.  Sedimentation and Hydrologic Processes in Lake Decatur and Its Watershed , 1987 .

[20]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  DWSM - a Dynamic Watershed Simulation Model. , 2002 .

[21]  D. K. Borah,et al.  Runoff Simulation Model for Small Watersheds , 1989 .

[22]  W. Bogner,et al.  SEDIMENTATION INVESTIGATION OF LAKE SPRINGFIELD , 1985 .

[23]  Deva K. Borah,et al.  WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGIC AND NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION MODELS: REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2004 .

[24]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  COMPARISON OF GREEN-AMPT AND CURVE NUMBER METHODS ON GOODWIN CREEK WATERSHED USING SWAT , 1999 .

[25]  Misganaw Demissie,et al.  Watershed Monitoring and Land Use Evaluation for the Vermilion River Watershed , 1996 .

[26]  D. K. Borah,et al.  WATER, SEDIMENT, NUTRIENT, AND PESTICIDE MEASUREMENTS IN AN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED IN ILLINOIS DURING STORM EVENTS , 2003 .

[27]  Nani G. Bhowmik,et al.  Sedimentation Investigation of Lake Springfield, Springfield, Illinois , 1985 .

[28]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[29]  Gregory F. McIsaac,et al.  Nitrate in river and subsurface drainage flows from an East Central Illinois watershed , 2000 .

[30]  R. Heimlich,et al.  Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. , 1999 .

[31]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  INTEGRATION OF WATERSHED TOOLS AND SWAT MODEL INTO BASINS 1 , 2002 .

[32]  D. K. Borah,et al.  WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGIC AND NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION MODELS: REVIEW OF MATHEMATICAL BASES , 2003 .