Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice

Thus far, most systematic reviews commissioned to inform international development policy have focused on questions of ‘what works’, drawing on experimental and quasi-experimental studies of the effects of interventions. This article argues that systematic review methods can be applied to answer a range of different questions for international development and pays particular attention to methods of synthesising qualitative evidence that apply the key principles of systematic reviewing of being comprehensive, systematic and transparent. The article introduces readers to the types of questions for which reviews of qualitative evidence might be appropriate, the types of evidence such reviews might include and the range of methods available for their synthesis.

[1]  J. Popay,et al.  Synthesing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence , 2013 .

[2]  V. Welch,et al.  Realist review to understand the efficacy of culturally appropriate diabetes education programmes , 2013, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[3]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas , 2012, Environmental Evidence.

[4]  Maren Duvendack,et al.  The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research , 2012 .

[5]  Peter Tugwell,et al.  How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit , 2012 .

[6]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Why do we always end up here? Evidence-based medicine's conceptual cul-de-sacs and some off-road alternative routes. , 2012, Journal of primary health care.

[7]  S. Basu,et al.  Comparative Performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[8]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Guidance for Evidence-Informed Policies about Health Systems: Assessing How Much Confidence to Place in the Research Evidence , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[9]  Aron Shlonsky,et al.  Systematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[10]  K. Hannes,et al.  Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach , 2012 .

[11]  Angela Harden,et al.  Synthesis: combining results systematically and appropriately , 2012 .

[12]  D. Gough,et al.  Commonality and diversity in reviews , 2012 .

[13]  Angela Harden,et al.  Quality and relevance appraisal , 2012 .

[14]  Maren Duvendack,et al.  Making systematic reviews work for international development research. SLRC Briefing Paper No. 1 , 2012 .

[15]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Using qualitative synthesis to explore heterogeneity of complex interventions , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[16]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[17]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Quality of Private and Public Ambulatory Health Care in Low and Middle Income Countries: Systematic Review of Comparative Studies , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[18]  Andrew Booth,et al.  A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[19]  S Michie,et al.  An evidence synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research on component intervention techniques, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, equity and acceptability of different versions of health-related lifestyle advisor role in improving health. , 2011, Health technology assessment.

[20]  K. Hannes.  Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Research , 2011 .

[21]  Janet Harris.  Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2011 .

[22]  M. Rashid,et al.  Social franchising evaluations: a scoping review. , 2011 .

[23]  Josiane Bonnefoy,et al.  Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[25]  John N. Lavis,et al.  How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking? , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[26]  Howard White,et al.  Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice , 2009 .

[27]  James Thomas,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: a Critical Review , 2022 .

[28]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research , 2009, Reproductive health.

[29]  J. Cecatti,et al.  Water aerobics II: maternal body composition and perinatal outcomes after a program for low risk pregnant women , 2009, Reproductive health.

[30]  Jennie Popay,et al.  Qualitative Research and Cochrane Reviews , 2008 .

[31]  A. Harden,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[32]  Mark Engel,et al.  Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[33]  Frans L. Leeuw,et al.  Combining Campbell Standards and the Realist Evaluation Approach , 2008 .

[34]  Ken Stein,et al.  A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[35]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Making Sense of Qualitative and Quantitative Findings in Mixed Research Synthesis Studies , 2008, Field methods.

[36]  Hude Quan,et al.  An administrative data merging solution for dealing with missing data in a clinical registry: adaptation from ICD-9 to ICD-10 , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[37]  J. Popay,et al.  Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods , 2007 .

[38]  S. Lewin,et al.  Patient Adherence to Tuberculosis Treatment: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[39]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations: A Systematic Literature Review , 2007 .

[40]  Janice Tripney,et al.  Accidental injury, risk-taking behaviour and the social circumstances in which young people (aged 12-24) live: a systematic review , 2007 .

[41]  S. Bogaerts,et al.  Violence Defied?: A Review of Prevention of Violence in the Public and Semi-public Domain , 2006 .

[42]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence , 2006 .

[43]  A. Harden,et al.  Young people, pregnancy and social exclusion: A systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support , 2006 .

[44]  J. Popay,et al.  Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews , 2006 .

[45]  Jennie Popay,et al.  Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Version 1 , 2006 .

[46]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[47]  J. Popay,et al.  Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[48]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[49]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[50]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations , 2005 .

[51]  Mary Dixon-Woods,et al.  Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[52]  Guy M. Goodwin,et al.  Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2004, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[53]  H Roberts,et al.  Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[54]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[55]  Jenny Donovan,et al.  Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[56]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Children and healthy eating: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators , 2003 .

[57]  Lucy Dillon,et al.  Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework. , 2003 .

[58]  C. Pope,et al.  Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[59]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[60]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Evidence and Policy and Naming and Shaming , 2002 .

[61]  David Evans,et al.  Reasons for physically restraining patients and residents: a systematic review and content analysis. , 2002, International journal of nursing studies.

[62]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[63]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[64]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[65]  G. Noblit,et al.  Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies , 1988 .

[66]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .