MR-Relaxation (MRR) of 1H nuclei and MR-Cryoporometry (MRC) are combined to assess their feasibility and their potential in the study of bone microstructure. In principle, both techniques are able to give information on the structure of the pore space confining the fluids. Cow femur samples were carefully cored and cleaned in order to remove the natural fluids inside. For MRR analysis quasi-continuous distributions of T(1) and T(2) were obtained on samples fully saturated with water. Cyclohexane was used as a saturating fluid for MRC analysis. All T(1) and T(2) quasi-continuous distributions of water confined in bone samples are more than three decades wide, showing sufficient details to differentiate the samples. Pore size distributions obtained by MRC also differentiate the samples showing different characteristics of the pore space structure in the range of the highest sensitivity of the method (typically 3 to 100 nm, mesopore range). In particular, in samples where MRR shows a large fraction of signal with relaxation times below 10(2) ms, MRC indicates a large fraction of pore volume with pore sizes in the mesopore range.
[1]
E. G. Smith,et al.
The characterization of porous solids by NMR.
,
1994,
Magnetic resonance imaging.
[2]
G. Guglielmi,et al.
From porous media to trabecular bone relaxation analysis: spatial variation of marrow 1H relaxation time distributions detected in vitro by quasi-continuous distribution analysis.
,
2001,
Magnetic resonance imaging.
[3]
G. C. Borgia,et al.
Uniform-penalty inversion of multiexponential decay data.
,
1998,
Journal of magnetic resonance.
[4]
Rahman,et al.
Characterization of porous solids by NMR.
,
1993,
Physical review letters.
[5]
H. Genant,et al.
Bone Densitometry and Osteoporosis
,
1998,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[6]
G. C. Borgia,et al.
Uniform-penalty inversion of multiexponential decay data. II. Data spacing, T(2) data, systemic data errors, and diagnostics.
,
2000,
Journal of magnetic resonance.