References and Notes

Monkey See, Monkey Read An orthographic object such as a set of letters, and the ability to recognize such sets as words, is a key component of reading. The ability to develop these skills has often been attributed to the prior acquisition of a complex language. For example, we learn how letters sound and thus recognize when a particular letter makes up part of a word. However, orthographic processing is also a visual process, because we learn to recognize words as discrete objects, and the ability to read may thus be related to an ability to recognize and classify objects. Grainger et al. (p. 245; see the Perspective by Platt and Adams) tested orthographic skills in baboons. Captive, but freely ranging, baboons were trained to distinguish real English words from combinations of similar letters that are not words, and they were able to distinguish real words with remarkable accuracy. Thus, a basic ability to recognize words as objects does not require complex linguistic understanding. Baboons discriminate words from nonwords on the basis of spelling. Skilled readers use information about which letters are where in a word (orthographic information) in order to access the sounds and meanings of printed words. We asked whether efficient processing of orthographic information could be achieved in the absence of prior language knowledge. To do so, we trained baboons to discriminate English words from nonsense combinations of letters that resembled real words. The results revealed that the baboons were using orthographic information in order to efficiently discriminate words from letter strings that were not words. Our results demonstrate that basic orthographic processing skills can be acquired in the absence of preexisting linguistic representations.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[2]  Masae Sato,et al.  Reading in the brain , 2012 .

[3]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[4]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[5]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Production, usage, and comprehension in animal vocalizations , 2010, Brain and Language.

[6]  Scott L. Brincat,et al.  Dynamic Shape Synthesis in Posterior Inferotemporal Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Kate Nation,et al.  Learning to Read Words , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Sigman,et al.  The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[12]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[13]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[14]  F. Ramus,et al.  Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. , 2000, Science.

[15]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[17]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  J. Fagot,et al.  First- and second-order configural sensitivity for greeble stimuli in baboons , 2010, Learning & behavior.

[21]  J. Fagot,et al.  Automated testing of cognitive performance in monkeys: Use of a battery of computerized test systems by a troop of semi-free-ranging baboons (Papio papio) , 2010, Behavior research methods.