Association Between Phase 3 Cardiac Rehabilitation and Clinical Events

PURPOSE: There is an inverse relationship between phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) visits and all-cause mortality. Phase 3 CR is a maintenance exercise program for which clinical outcomes are uncertain. This retrospective study describes the association between phase 3 CR participation and clinical events among patients with ischemic heart disease after completion of phase 2 CR. METHODS: Patients who completed 12 visits of phase 2 CR as provided by their health insurance were categorized on the basis of their frequency of participation (ie, none, irregular, and regular) in phase 3 CR during the 8 weeks after phase 2 CR. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between phase 3 CR participation and risk for a composite outcome that included all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or heart failure hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 2039 patients (32% women; age = 59 ± 10 years) who completed phase 2 CR, 101 were regular and 129 were irregular participants of phase 3 CR. Over a median followup of 5.6 years, 556 (27%) patients experienced the outcome. Neither irregular nor regular participation in phase 3 CR was significantly associated with risk for the outcome in unadjusted (P = .671 and P = .396, respectively) or adjusted (P = .737 and P = .890, respectively) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an incremental clinical benefit from weekly participation in Phase 3 CR after completion of phase 2 CR among patients with ischemic heart disease. Additional research addressing the dose-response relationship between phase 2 and 3 CR and clinical outcomes is needed.

[1]  W. Ghali,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation Attendance and Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease Patients , 2012, Circulation.

[2]  H. McGee,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory Survey , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[3]  K. Schulman,et al.  Relationship Between Cardiac Rehabilitation and Long-Term Risks of Death and Myocardial Infarction Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries , 2010, Circulation.

[4]  D. Blazer,et al.  Identifying a national death index match. , 2009, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  T. Stukel,et al.  Analysis methods for observational studies: effects of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality of coronary patients. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Normand,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Global secondary prevention strategies to limit event recurrence after myocardial infarction: results of the GOSPEL study, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial from the Italian Cardiac Rehabilitation Network. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  M. Lauer,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Su , 2005, Circulation.

[9]  J. Spinelli,et al.  The Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) following cardiac rehabilitation trial. , 2003, European heart journal.

[10]  L. Bouter,et al.  How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Recherche Op Rationnelle Practical Considerations on the Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index with Administrative Data Bases , 1996 .