Stimulus-specific information is represented as local activity patterns across the brain

Modern neuroimaging represents three-dimensional brain activity, which varies across brain regions. It remains unknown whether activity of different brain regions has similar spatial organization to reflect similar cognitive processes. We developed a rotational cross-correlation method allowing a straightforward analysis of spatial activity patterns distributed across the brain in stimulation specific contrast images. Results of this method were verified using several statistical approaches on real and simulated random datasets. We found, for example, that the seed patterns in the fusiform face area were robustly correlated to brain regions involved in face-specific representations. These regions differed from the non-specific visual network meaning that activity structure in the brain is locally preserved in stimulus-specific regions. Our findings indicate spatially correlated perceptual representations in cerebral activity and suggest that the 3D coding of the processed information is organized using locally preserved activity patterns across the brain. More generally, our results demonstrate that information is represented and shared in the local spatial configurations of brain activity.

[1]  J Carpenter,et al.  Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Chase C. Dougherty,et al.  Characterization of Face-Selective Patches in Orbitofrontal Cortex , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Searchlight analysis: Promise, pitfalls, and potential , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  Sylvia Wirth,et al.  Face cells in orbitofrontal cortex represent social categories , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  M. Pontecorvo,et al.  Cognitive and functional patterns of nondemented subjects with equivocal visual amyloid PET findings , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Richard N Henson,et al.  A multi-subject, multi-modal human neuroimaging dataset , 2015, Scientific Data.

[7]  P. Morosan,et al.  Human Primary Auditory Cortex: Cytoarchitectonic Subdivisions and Mapping into a Spatial Reference System , 2001, NeuroImage.

[8]  T. Ono,et al.  Face perception in its neurobiological and social context , 2008 .

[9]  J. Démonet,et al.  The Pattern and Loci of Training-Induced Brain Changes in Healthy Older Adults Are Predicted by the Nature of the Intervention , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  Impairment of Emotional Facial Expression and Prosody Discrimination Due to Ischemic Cerebellar Lesions , 2014, The Cerebellum.

[11]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  K. Strelnikov Neuroimaging and neuroenergetics: Brain activations as information-driven reorganization of energy flows , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  Eric T. Carlson,et al.  A neural code for three-dimensional object shape in macaque inferotemporal cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5 , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[16]  M. Bear,et al.  A current source density analysis of evoked responses in slices of adult rat visual cortex: implications for the regulation of long-term potentiation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Emotions in motion: Dynamic compared to static facial expressions of disgust and happiness reveal more widespread emotion-specific activations , 2009, Brain Research.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain work and brain imaging. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Torgeir Moberget,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Cerebellar Contributions to Motor Control and Language Comprehension: Searching for Common Computational Principles , 2022 .

[21]  U. Mitzdorf Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. , 1985, Physiological reviews.

[22]  Strelnikov Kuzma Energy-information coupling during integrative cognitive processes. , 2019, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Anne-Lise Giraud,et al.  Prediction across sensory modalities: A neurocomputational model of the McGurk effect , 2015, Cortex.

[25]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Spatial relationship between neuronal activity and BOLD functional MRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  Processing Faces and Facial Expressions , 2003, Neuropsychology Review.

[27]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Revealing representational content with pattern-information fMRI--an introductory guide. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[28]  Alan P. Koretsky,et al.  BOLD fMRI and somatosensory evoked potentials are well correlated over a broad range of frequency content of somatosensory stimulation of the rat forepaw , 2008, Brain Research.

[29]  Hermann Ackermann,et al.  Cerebellar contributions to speech production and speech perception: psycholinguistic and neurobiological perspectives , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Selective Attention Modulates Early Human Evoked Potentials during Emotional Face–Voice Processing , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Démonet The ageing-brain cognitive diseases: advances and promises. , 2017, Current opinion in neurology.

[32]  D. Willshaw,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr221 Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published September 21, 2011 Similarity-Based Extraction of Individual Networks from Gray Matter MRI Scans , 2022 .

[33]  Marco Tamietto,et al.  The Recognition of Facial Emotions in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Patients , 2011, The Cerebellum.

[34]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spikes versus BOLD: what does neuroimaging tell us about neuronal activity? , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  R. Shulman,et al.  The contribution of GABA to glutamate/glutamine cycling and energy metabolism in the rat cortex in vivo. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Shawn R. Olsen,et al.  Gain control by layer six in cortical circuits of vision , 2012, Nature.

[37]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Isabelle Peretz,et al.  Cross‐classification of musical and vocal emotions in the auditory cortex , 2018, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  AICHA: An atlas of intrinsic connectivity of homotopic areas , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[40]  P. Barone,et al.  Effects of vocoding and intelligibility on the cerebral response to speech , 2011, BMC Neuroscience.

[41]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  L. Miller,et al.  The nature of facial expression recognition deficits following orbitofrontal cortex damage. , 2014, Neuropsychology.

[43]  John A. Pyles,et al.  Dynamic Encoding of Face Information in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2014, Nature Communications.

[44]  Fahmeed Hyder,et al.  Energetic basis of brain activity: implications for neuroimaging , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[46]  T. Kochiyama,et al.  Neural substrates of the ability to recognize facial expressions: a voxel-based morphometry study , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[47]  J. Detre,et al.  To smooth or not to smooth? ROC analysis of perfusion fMRI data. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[48]  Kuzma Strelnikov,et al.  Stable Modality-Specific Activity Flows As Reflected by the Neuroenergetic Approach to the fMRI Weighted Maps , 2012, PloS one.

[49]  Matthew H. Davis The Neurobiology of Lexical Access , 2016 .

[50]  Lin Yang,et al.  Linear and nonlinear relationships between visual stimuli, EEG and BOLD fMRI signals , 2010, NeuroImage.

[51]  P. Barone,et al.  Overlapping Brain Activity as Reflected by the Spatial Differentiation of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography Data , 2013 .

[52]  C. Jack,et al.  Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on biomarkers , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.