Considerations for early acute myocardial infarction rule-out for emergency department chest pain patients: the case of copeptin
暂无分享,去创建一个
G. Lippi | M. Volpe | M. Galvani | M. Tubaro | M. Plebani | S. Di Somma | Simona Ferraro | G. Marenzi | V. Monzani | P. Moscatelli | M. Cavazza | P. Cappelletti | A. Vernocchi | A. Peracino | A. Lombardi | S. Ferraro
[1] Benjamin R. McClintic,et al. Approach to the Patient with Chest Pain , 2012 .
[2] H. Katus,et al. Combined testing of high-sensitivity troponin T and copeptin on presentation at prespecified cutoffs improves rapid rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.
[3] Alan S Maisel,et al. Short-term mortality risk in emergency department acute heart failure. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[4] P. Ponikowski,et al. Increased 90-Day Mortality in Patients With Acute Heart Failure With Elevated Copeptin: Secondary Results From the Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure (BACH) Study , 2011, Circulation. Heart failure.
[5] U. Lotze,et al. Combined determination of highly sensitive troponin T and copeptin for early exclusion of acute myocardial infarction: first experience in an emergency department of a general hospital , 2011, Vascular health and risk management.
[6] J. Köhrle,et al. Copeptin and peroxiredoxin-4 independently predict mortality in patients with nonspecific complaints presenting to the emergency department. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[7] W. Rottbauer,et al. Copeptin does not add diagnostic information to high-sensitivity troponin T in low- to intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain: results from the rule out myocardial infarction by computed tomography (ROMICAT) study. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.
[8] S. Anker,et al. Comparison of the temporal release pattern of copeptin with conventional biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction , 2011, Clinical Research in Cardiology.
[9] Brandy Drake. A 2-h Diagnostic Protocol to Assess Patients with Chest Pain Symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): A Prospective Observational Validation Study , 2011 .
[10] Leong L Ng,et al. C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin) as a prognostic marker after acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: Leicester Acute Myocardial Infarction Peptide II (LAMP II) study. , 2011, Clinical science.
[11] B. Riou,et al. High-sensitivity versus conventional troponin in the emergency department for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction , 2011, Critical care.
[12] J. Rehfeld,et al. Association of copeptin and N-terminal proBNP concentrations with risk of cardiovascular death in older patients with symptoms of heart failure. , 2011, JAMA.
[13] A. Hall,et al. The RATPAC (Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac markers) trial: a randomised controlled trial of point-of-care cardiac markers in the emergency department. , 2011, Health technology assessment.
[14] S. Kristensen,et al. A third troponin T blood sample is not cost-effective in patients with suspected non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome , 2011, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.
[15] K. Wahbi,et al. Combination of copeptin and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot study. , 2011, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.
[16] A. Khera,et al. Association of troponin T detected with a highly sensitive assay and cardiac structure and mortality risk in the general population. , 2010, JAMA.
[17] N. Morgenthaler,et al. Copeptin and risk stratification in patients with acute dyspnea , 2010, Critical care.
[18] James McCord,et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.
[19] Mario Plebani,et al. Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care. , 2010, European heart journal.
[20] N. Morgenthaler,et al. Copeptin: a biomarker of cardiovascular and renal function. , 2010, Congestive heart failure.
[21] H. Litt,et al. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[22] Mario Plebani,et al. The “hospital central laboratory”: automation, integration and clinical usefulness , 2010, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[23] A. Jaffe,et al. Biological and analytical variability of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.
[24] S. Sandberg,et al. Can changes in troponin results be useful in diagnosing myocardial infarction? , 2010, Clinical chemistry.
[25] Alan S. Go,et al. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[26] A. Jaffe,et al. Being rational about (im)precision: a statement from the Biochemistry Subcommittee of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/World Heart Federation Task Force for the definition of myocardial infarction. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.
[27] S. Blankenberg,et al. Copeptin improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[28] A. Maisel,et al. The utility of biomarkers in sorting out the complex patient. , 2010, The American journal of medicine.
[29] L. Rydén,et al. Copeptin, IGFBP-1, and Cardiovascular Prognosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2010, Diabetes Care.
[30] M. Kontos,et al. Emergency department and office-based evaluation of patients with chest pain. , 2010, Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[31] Nader Rifai,et al. What is a biomarker? Research investments and lack of clinical integration necessitate a review of biomarker terminology and validation schema , 2010, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.
[32] D. Bruns,et al. Assessing the impact of biomarkers on patient outcome: An obligatory step , 2010, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.
[33] M. Scott. When do new biomarkers make economic sense? , 2010, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.
[34] E. Dobos,et al. Guidelines for the use of biomarkers: Principles, processes and practical considerations , 2010, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.
[35] D. Morrow. Clinical application of sensitive troponin assays. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.
[36] A. Gass,et al. Copeptin: A novel, independent prognostic marker in patients with ischemic stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.
[37] N. Morgenthaler,et al. Incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[38] F. Apple,et al. Role of monitoring changes in sensitive cardiac troponin I assay results for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction and prediction of risk of adverse events. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.
[39] Filippo Ottani,et al. Percorso di valutazione del dolore toracico. Valutazione dei requisiti di base per l'implementazione negli ospedali italiani , 2009 .
[40] M. Plebani,et al. Cardiac troponins: what we knew, what we know – where are we now? , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[41] A. Giannoni,et al. Measurement of circulating concentrations of cardiac troponin I and T in healthy subjects: a tool for monitoring myocardial tissue renewal? , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[42] A. Wu,et al. Short- and long-term biological variation in cardiac troponin I measured with a high-sensitivity assay: implications for clinical practice. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.
[43] D. Cohen,et al. Interpreting the results of cost-effectiveness studies. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[44] J. Struck,et al. C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin) is associated with left ventricular dysfunction, remodeling, and clinical heart failure in survivors of myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of cardiac failure.
[45] G. Filippatos,et al. Natriuretic peptides in acute coronary syndromes: prognostic value and clinical implications. , 2008, Congestive heart failure.
[46] N. Morgenthaler,et al. Copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the vasopressin precursor, correlates with the individual stress level. , 2008, Neuro endocrinology letters.
[47] M. Christ-Crain,et al. Copeptin: a new and promising diagnostic and prognostic marker , 2008, Critical care.
[48] J. Struck,et al. Copeptin: clinical use of a new biomarker , 2008, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.
[49] J. Alpert,et al. Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction , 2008 .
[50] M. Emdin,et al. Distribution of plasma cardiac troponin I values in healthy subjects: pathophysiological considerations , 2008, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[51] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007 .
[52] J. Struck,et al. COPEPTIN, A STABLE PEPTIDE OF THE ARGININE VASOPRESSIN PRECURSOR, IS ELEVATED IN HEMORRHAGIC AND SEPTIC SHOCK , 2007, Shock.
[53] G. Lippi,et al. How many troponins should we measure to get a clinically significant result? , 2007, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.
[54] J. Struck,et al. C-Terminal Provasopressin (Copeptin) as a Novel and Prognostic Marker in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Leicester Acute Myocardial Infarction Peptide (LAMP) Study , 2007, Circulation.
[55] Fred S Apple,et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, Circulation.
[56] Robert H Christenson,et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, Clinical chemistry.
[57] W. Gibler,et al. The role of cardiac risk factor burden in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department setting. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.
[58] R. Redberg,et al. The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[59] Maureen Chase,et al. Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.
[60] Jawahar Kalra,et al. Impact of the cardiac troponin testing algorithm on excessive and inappropriate troponin test requests. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.
[61] Harry P. Selker,et al. Presentations of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Men and Women , 1997, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[62] J. Struck,et al. Assay for the measurement of copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the precursor of vasopressin. , 2006, Clinical chemistry.
[63] J. Struck,et al. Copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the vasopressin precursor, is elevated in serum of sepsis patients , 2005, Peptides.
[64] M. Gheorghiade,et al. Vasopressin antagonism in heart failure. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[65] A. Jeremias,et al. Narrative Review: Alternative Causes for Elevated Cardiac Troponin Levels when Acute Coronary Syndromes Are Excluded , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[66] C. S. Gal,et al. Non-peptide vasopressin V1b receptor antagonists as potential drugs for the treatment of stress-related disorders. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical design.
[67] Fred S Apple,et al. Future biomarkers for detection of ischemia and risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.
[68] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Seven-year follow-up after dobutamine stress echocardiography: impact of gender on prognosis. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[69] R. Hendel,et al. Acute resting myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the emergency room assessment of sestamibi for evaluation of chest pain (ERASE Chest Pain) trial , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[70] R. Lima,et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion 99m-technetium-sestamibi SPECT in the elderly. , 2004, International journal of cardiology.
[71] S. Dixon,et al. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[72] S. Goodacre,et al. Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.
[73] R. Davey. Troponin testing: an audit in three metropolitan hospitals , 2003 .
[74] H. Joller-jemelka,et al. Troponin as a risk factor for mortality in critically ill patients without acute coronary syndromes. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[75] E. Amsterdam,et al. Immediate Exercise Testing to Evaluate Low-Risk Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain. , 2003 .
[76] C. S. Gal,et al. The vasopressin V1b receptor as a therapeutic target in stress-related disorders. , 2003, Current drug targets. CNS and neurological disorders.
[77] I. Olivotto,et al. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary chest pain unit for the assessment of coronary syndromes and risk stratification in the Florence area. , 2002, American heart journal.
[78] S. Campbell,et al. A prospective, observational study of a chest pain observation unit in a British hospital , 2002, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.
[79] M. Runge,et al. Randomized comparison of a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography versus exercise testing in low-risk patients in a chest pain unit: in-hospital and long-term outcomes. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[80] V. Roger,et al. Prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in 2,632 patients > or = 65 years of age. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[81] R Ruthazer,et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.
[82] E. Antman,et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.
[83] E W Steyerberg,et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators. , 2000, Circulation.
[84] J. McMurray,et al. “Chest pain—please admit”: is there an alternative? , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[85] E. Amsterdam,et al. Evaluation of chest pain suspicious for acute coronary syndrome: use of an accelerated diagnostic protocol in a chest pain evaluation unit. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.
[86] S. Zarich,et al. The Goldman algorithm revisited: prospective evaluation of a computer-derived algorithm versus unaided physician judgment in suspected acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, American heart journal.
[87] E. Amsterdam,et al. Immediate exercise testing of low risk patients with known coronary artery disease presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[88] H. Schunkert,et al. Evidence for a vasopressin system in the rat heart. , 1999, Circulation research.
[89] R. Walls,et al. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of early negative exercise tolerance test in patients with acute chest pain seen in the hospital emergency department. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.
[90] C. Heeschen,et al. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.
[91] L. Graff,et al. Impact on the care of the emergency department chest pain patient from the chest pain evaluation registry (CHEPER) study. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.
[92] J. Muhlestein,et al. An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: results of a randomized study (ROMIO). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[93] R B D'Agostino,et al. Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study. , 1993, Annals of emergency medicine.
[94] R. Conroy,et al. Does intensive medical therapy influence the outcome in unstable angina? , 1990, Clinical cardiology.
[95] J. Cohn. Neuroendocrine activation after acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.
[96] I. Sand. Litigation against the emergency physician. Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction , 1990 .
[97] E F Cook,et al. A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.
[98] G. So. The prognostic importance of asymptomatic ischemic episodes in patients with unstable angina pectoris. , 1987 .
[99] M. Weisfeldt,et al. Silent ischemia predicts infarction and death during 2 year follow-up of unstable angina. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[100] G W Rouan,et al. Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.
[101] S. Gottlieb. The prognostic importance of asymptomatic ischemic episodes in patients with unstable angina pectoris. , 1987, Herz.
[102] F. Harrell,et al. The prognosis for patients with new-onset angina who have undergone cardiac catheterization. , 1983, Circulation.
[103] R. Gokal,et al. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion associated with acute myocardial infarction. , 1977, Postgraduate medical journal.