This work deals with the further development and optimization of a simulated countercurrent moving bed chromatographic reactor (SCMCR) for the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM). To optimize the adsorptive separation of OCM products from unreacted methane, different adsorbents were selected and tested. Hydrophobic carbon molecular sieve, examined along with other adsorbents (activated charcoal and zeolite with high silica/alumina ratio), appears to be the most suitable choice, both for methane storing and for efficient handling of the OCM separation. Three catalysts, Sm 2 O 3 , Y 1 Ba 2 Zr 3 O 9.5 , and Y 1 Ba 2 Ge 1 O 3.5 have been studied in microcatalytic reactor experiments. The Y 1 Ba 2 Zr 3 O 9.5 catalyst proved to be the best, giving 84% selectivity to C 2 -products at a CH 4 /O 2 ratio of 11 and nearly complete oxygen conversion. A detailed model of the SCMCR employing experimental information about the catalyst and adsorbent properties was developed to analyze the complex cyclic behavior of the SCMCR. It was found that observed methane loss, and therefore decreased conversion, are caused by incomplete desorption of methane in the carrier section of the SCMCR. This effect can be minimized by selecting a better adsorbent. The influence of the switching time and CH 4 /O 2 ratio in the make-up feed, the two most important parameters in this system, on reactor performance was analyzed. It was shown that for the best catalyst (Y 1 Ba 2 Zr 3 O 9.5 ) at optimal operating conditions the SCMCR can give 55% yield for C2 products at 75% methane conversion. Adaptive flow switching and the use of a non-uniform make-up feed appear to be promising methods for further optimization of the SCMCR.
[1]
Mark C. Bjorklund,et al.
The simulated countercurrent moving bed chromatographic reactor: a catalytic and separative reactor
,
1995
.
[2]
B. P. Leonard,et al.
A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation
,
1990
.
[3]
A. Morikawa,et al.
THE CATALYSTS ACTIVE AND SELECTIVE IN OXIDATIVE COUPLING OF METHANE
,
1985
.
[4]
Linda R. Petzold,et al.
Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations
,
1996,
Classics in applied mathematics.
[5]
R. Hall,et al.
Effects of Product Separation on the Kinetics and Selectivity of Oxidative Coupling
,
1995
.
[6]
R. Aris,et al.
Enhanced C2 Yields from Methane Oxidative Coupling by Means of a Separative Chemical Reactor
,
1993,
Science.
[7]
K. S. Knaebel,et al.
Pressure swing adsorption
,
1993
.