Couch: Investigating the Relationship between Aesthetics and Persuasion in a Mobile Application

Aesthetics, specifically visual appeal, is an important aspect of user experience. It is included as a principle in frameworks such as Fogg’s Functional Triad and the Persuasive Systems Design. Yet, literature that directly investigates the influence of aesthetics on persuasion is limited, especially in the context of mobile applications. To understand how aesthetics influences persuasion if it includes the concept of operant conditioning, we designed a mobile app called Couch, which aims to reduce sedentary behaviour. We devised a 2x2 between-subject experiment, creating four versions of the app with two levels of aesthetics and two levels of persuasion (with and without). Measuring persuasion through self-reports, we found that higher levels of persuasion had a significant impact in reducing sedentary behaviour over aesthetics. However, visual appeal had no significant effect on persuasion. We comment on the level of visual appeal of the app and discuss the implications for future work.

[1]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal Principles of Design , 2003 .

[2]  Janice Redish User-Centered Website Development: A Human-Computer Interaction Approach , 2004 .

[3]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality , 2008, TCHI.

[4]  Parisa Eslambolchilar,et al.  Walking in the Wild - Using an Always-On Smartphone Application to Increase Physical Activity , 2013, INTERACT.

[5]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Visual aesthetics and human preference. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[7]  Richard J. Koubek,et al.  The Effects of Aesthetics and Cognitive, Style on Perceived Usability , 2006 .

[8]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[9]  I-Min Lee,et al.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  D. Alter,et al.  Sedentary Time and Its Association With Risk for Disease Incidence, Mortality, and Hospitalization in Adults , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[12]  M. Thun,et al.  American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention , 2002, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  User Satisfaction, Aesthetics and Usability: Beyond Reductionism , 2002, Usability.

[14]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[15]  H. Kohl,et al.  Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. , 2005, Obesity research.

[16]  M. Leitzmann,et al.  Television viewing and time spent sedentary in relation to cancer risk: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  M. Hassenzahl,et al.  AESTHETICS IN INTERACTIVE PRODUCTS: CORRELATES AND CONSEQUENCES OF BEAUTY , 2008 .

[19]  Kara A. Latorella,et al.  The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Bambang Parmanto,et al.  PersonA: Persuasive social network for physical Activity , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Technology in Mobile Applications Promoting Physical Activity: a Systematic Review , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[22]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  A blessing, not a curse: Experimental evidence for beneficial effects of visual aesthetics on performance , 2009, Ergonomics.

[23]  Ben Kirman,et al.  There's a monster in my kitchen: using aversive feedback to motivate behaviour change , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  J. Shaw,et al.  Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting Reduces Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Responses , 2012, Diabetes Care.

[25]  Lauralee Alben,et al.  Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design , 1996, INTR.

[26]  Rita Orji,et al.  Persuasive technology for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerging trends , 2018, Health Informatics J..

[27]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Improving the Efficacy of Games for Change Using Personalization Models , 2017, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[28]  G. Healy,et al.  Patterns of sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk among Canadian adults. , 2014, Preventive medicine.

[29]  Meng-Chieh Chiu,et al.  Motivating the motivators: Lessons learned from the design and evaluation of a social persuasion system , 2014, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[30]  Sangwon Lee,et al.  The Impact of Cognitive Style on User Preference Based on Usability and Aesthetics for Computer-Based Systems , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Siobhan McMahon,et al.  Mobile computer application for promoting physical activity. , 2013, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[33]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Native Mobile Applications For Personal Well-Being: A Persuasive Systems Design Evaluation , 2012, PACIS.

[34]  Victor Cheung,et al.  Save the Kiwi: Encouraging Better Food Management through Behaviour Change and Persuasive Design Theories in a Mobile App , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[35]  Masaaki Kurosu,et al.  Determinants of the Apparent Usability , 1995 .

[36]  Alistair Sutcliffe,et al.  Designing for User Engagement: Aesthetic and Attractive User Interfaces , 2009, Designing for User Engagement.

[37]  M. Thun,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity for Cancer Prevention: Reducing the Risk of Cancer With Healthy Food Choices and Physical Activity , 2002, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[38]  Alistair Sutcliffe,et al.  Attractive Agents Are More Persuasive , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[39]  Andreas Sonderegger,et al.  The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[40]  M. Thüring,et al.  Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction , 2007 .

[41]  Sangwon Lee,et al.  Understanding user preferences based on usability and aesthetics before and after actual use , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[42]  John P. Sheposh,et al.  Beauty or Brains: Which Image for Your Mate? , 1977 .

[43]  Jylana L. Sheats,et al.  Harnessing Different Motivational Frames via Mobile Phones to Promote Daily Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Aging Adults , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  Michael Burmester,et al.  AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität , 2003, MuC.

[45]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Inference of Perceived Usability From Beauty , 2010, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues , 1997, CHI.

[48]  BJ Fogg,et al.  Creating persuasive technologies: an eight-step design process , 2009, Persuasive '09.