A fuzzy logic-based damage identification method for simply-supported bridge using modal shape ratios

Abstract A fuzzy logic system (FLS) is established for damage identification of simply supported bridge. A novel damage indicator is developed based on ratios of mode shape components between before and after damage. Numerical simulation of a simply-supported bridge is presented to demonstrate the memory, inference and anti-noise ability of the proposed method. The bridge is divided into eight elements and nine nodes, the damage indicator vector at characteristic nodes is used as the input measurement of FLS. Results reveal that FLS can detect damage of training patterns with an accuracy of 100%. Aiming at other test patterns, the FLS also possesses favorable inference ability, the identification accuracy for single damage location is up to 93.75%. Tests with noise simulated data show that the FLS possesses favorable anti-noise ability.

[1]  Ardeshir Bahreininejad,et al.  Damage detection of truss bridge joints using Artificial Neural Networks , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  R. Ganguli A Fuzzy Logic System for Ground Based Structural Health Monitoring of a Helicopter Rotor Using Modal Data , 2001 .

[3]  Vistasp M. Karbhari,et al.  Improved damage detection method based on Element Modal Strain Damage Index using sparse measurement , 2008 .

[4]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies , 1979 .

[5]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Evidential reasoning approach for bridge condition assessment , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Ayaho Miyamoto,et al.  Fuzzy concrete bridge deck condition rating method for practical bridge management system , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Hong Hao,et al.  Vibration based damage detection using artificial neural network with consideration of uncertainties , 2007 .

[8]  O. S. Salawu Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .

[9]  W. T. Yeung,et al.  Damage detection in bridges using neural networks for pattern recognition of vibration signatures , 2005 .

[10]  Anjan Dutta,et al.  Damage detection in bridges using accurate modal parameters , 2004 .

[11]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Structural damage detection using fuzzy cognitive maps and Hebbian learning , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Multi-stage identification scheme for detecting damage in cable-stayed Kap Shui Mun Bridge , 2002 .

[13]  Arun Kumar Pandey,et al.  Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes , 1991 .

[14]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[15]  Muneo Hori,et al.  A NUMERICAL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION USING CHANGES IN THE ROTATION OF MODE SHAPES , 2002 .

[16]  Colin P. Ratcliffe,et al.  Local Damage Detection with the Global Fitting Method Using Mode Shape Data in Notched Beams , 2009 .

[17]  J. K. Liu,et al.  Identification of local damages in coupled beam systems from measured dynamic responses , 2009 .

[18]  Mustafa Sabuncu,et al.  Detection and Advancement Monitoring of Distributed Pitting Failure in Gears , 2010 .

[19]  WangYing-Ming,et al.  Evidential reasoning approach for bridge condition assessment , 2008 .

[20]  Zhiye Zhao,et al.  A fuzzy system for concrete bridge damage diagnosis , 2002 .

[21]  Yongchun Cheng,et al.  Reduction of Uncertainties for Damage Identification of Bridge Based on Fuzzy Nearness and Modal Data , 2012, J. Appl. Math..

[22]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[23]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Genetic fuzzy system for online structural health monitoring of composite helicopter rotor blades , 2007 .

[24]  N. Lakshmanan,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Based Condition Rating of Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges , 2006 .

[25]  S. Law,et al.  Structural damage localization from modal strain energy change , 1998 .

[26]  R. A. Shenoi,et al.  Quantification and localisation of damage in beam-like structures by using artificial neural networks with experimental validation , 2003 .

[27]  M. Cao,et al.  Novel Laplacian scheme and multiresolution modal curvatures for structural damage identification , 2009 .

[28]  Chung Bang Yun,et al.  Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models , 2003 .

[29]  M. M. Reda Taha,et al.  Damage identification for structural health monitoring using fuzzy pattern recognition , 2005 .

[30]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Application of Modal Flexibility and Its Derivatives in Structural Identification , 1998 .

[31]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Structural Damage Detection Using Modal Curvature and Fuzzy Logic , 2009 .

[32]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[33]  M. Chandrashekhar,et al.  Uncertainty handling in structural damage detection using fuzzy logic and probabilistic simulation , 2009 .

[34]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy logic = computing with words , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[35]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Defuzzification: criteria and classification , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[36]  C. Ratcliffe DAMAGE DETECTION USING A MODIFIED LAPLACIAN OPERATOR ON MODE SHAPE DATA , 1997 .