Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits

Abstract As technical realization of highly and fully automated vehicles draws closer, attention is being shifted from sheer feasibility to the question of how an acceptable driving style and thus comfort can be implemented. It is increasingly important to determine, how highly automated vehicles should drive to ensure driving comfort for the now passive drivers. Thus far, only little research has been conducted to examine this issue. In order to lay a basis on how automated vehicles should drive to ensure passenger comfort, different variations of three central maneuvers were rated and analyzed. A simulator study (N = 72) was conducted in order to identify comfortable driving strategies. Three variations of lane changes, accelerations and decelerations were configured by manipulating acceleration and jerk, and thus the course of each maneuver. Furthermore, the influence of personality traits and self-reported driving style on preferences of differently executed automated maneuvers was analyzed. Results suggest keeping acceleration and jerk as small as possible for acceleration maneuvers. For lane changes, both small accelerations as well as an early motion feedback are advisable. Interestingly, decelerating as a manual driver would is rejected compared to two artificial alternatives. Moreover, no influence of personality traits on maneuver preference was found. Only self-reported driving style had a marginal effect on participants’ preferences. In conclusion, a recommendation for an automated driving style can be given, which was perceived as comfortable by participants regardless of their personality.

[1]  A Page,et al.  System to measure the use of the backrest in sitting-posture office tasks. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  J. Krems,et al.  The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information , 2013 .

[3]  B A Jonah,et al.  Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust in automation. I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems , 1994 .

[5]  M. Gresty,et al.  Thresholds for detection of motion direction during passive lateral whole-body acceleration in normal subjects and patients with bilateral loss of labyrinthine function , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[6]  Joost Venrooij,et al.  Continuous rating of perceived visual-inertial motion incoherence during driving simulation , 2015 .

[7]  N Moray,et al.  Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[8]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[9]  H. Hecht,et al.  AMBIENT LIGHTING MODIFIES THE FLAVOR OF WINE , 2009 .

[10]  Mark S. Young,et al.  A proposed psychological model of driving automation , 2000 .

[11]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Milan Simic,et al.  In the Passenger Seat: Investigating Ride Comfort Measures in Autonomous Cars , 2015, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[13]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[14]  C. Holland,et al.  Differential moderating effect of locus of control on effect of driving experience in young male and female drivers , 2010 .

[15]  M. Mikulincer,et al.  The multidimensional driving style inventory--scale construct and validation. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  M. de Looze,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Ergonomics Sitting Comfort and Discomfort and the Relationships with Objective Measures Sitting Comfort and Discomfort and the Relationships with Objective Measures , 2022 .

[17]  Arnd Engeln,et al.  Fahrkomfort und Fahrgenuss durch den Einsatz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen , 2008 .

[18]  Yi Lu Murphey,et al.  Driver's style classification using jerk analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Vehicular Systems.

[19]  D. French,et al.  Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: an examination method and findings. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  André Beauducel,et al.  Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Normen einer deutschsprachigen Fassung der Sensation Seeking-Skalen, Form V , 2003 .

[21]  H J Eysenck,et al.  Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Tactical Driving Behavior With Different Levels of Automation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  Christian Schmid,et al.  A Matlab function to estimate choice model parameters from paired-comparison data , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[24]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[25]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Demographic influences in sensation seeking and expressions of sensation seeking in religion, smoking and driving habits , 1980 .

[26]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Objective Metrics of Comfort: Developing a Driving Style for Highly Automated Vehicles , 2016 .

[27]  Samantha Jamson,et al.  Would those who need ISA, use it? Investigating the relationship between drivers' speed choice and their use of a voluntary ISA system , 2006 .

[28]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Can We Study Autonomous Driving Comfort in Moving-Base Driving Simulators? A Validation Study , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[29]  Behrang Keshavarz,et al.  Validating an Efficient Method to Quantify Motion Sickness , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Can You Feel The Difference? The Just Noticeable Difference of Longitudinal Acceleration , 2013 .

[31]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust Between Humans and Machines, and the Design of Decision Aids , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[32]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Towards Understanding Motivational and Emotional Factors in Driver Behaviour: Comfort Through Satisficing , 2007 .

[33]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1952 .

[34]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Identifying Factors of Comfort and Discomfort in Sitting , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[35]  Hans-Rüdiger Pfister,et al.  Discomfort in Automated Driving - The Disco-Scale , 2013, HCI.

[36]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004 .

[37]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in Drivers' self-assessments of their perceptual-motor and safety skills: Australians and Finns , 1998 .

[38]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems , 2000 .

[39]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  A Review of Research on Driving Styles and Road Safety , 2015, Hum. Factors.