Effects of democracy, social inequality and economic growth on climate justice: An analysis with structural equation modelling

The purpose of this paper was to assess the effects of social inequality, democracy, and economic growth on the climate justice performance of a nation. To achieve this goal, the research technique Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS‐SEM) was applied to a sample of 133 countries selected based on indicators available in international databases in 2019. The main results of the analysis were: (a) the effect of democracy on the performance of climate justice is positive; (b) the moderating effect of inequality on the relationship between democracy and climate justice is negative; and (c) economic growth has a U‐shaped relationship with climate justice performance, which indicates the existence of a Kuznets curve for climate justice performance. Based on these results, the main theoretical implications of this study were the discoveries that: (a) the weakening of democratic institutions may be associated with increased social inequality, which reduces the implementation of climate policies aimed at guaranteeing justice; (b) forms of cooperation and financing of climate actions at the global level may be ineffective only if the quality of democracy in vulnerable countries is observed, which can be explained by the persistence of high social inequality; (c) allowing women access to income, education and health might be ways of reducing gender inequality and improving the level of adaptation of countries vulnerable to climate challenges.

[1]  C. Ringle,et al.  Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research , 2023, Industrial Marketing Management.

[2]  J. Ford,et al.  Vulnerability and loss and damage following the COP27 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2023, Regional Environmental Change.

[3]  J. Roldán,et al.  Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations , 2023, Journal of Business Research.

[4]  E. Mariano,et al.  Measuring the effects of climate techs and social inequality on climate performance using a SEM-DEA approach , 2022, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[5]  S. Juhola,et al.  Connecting climate justice and adaptation planning: An adaptation justice index , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[6]  M. Çetin,et al.  Environmental quality and health expenditures efficiency in Türkiye: the role of natural resources , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  Christina T. Kwauk,et al.  Gender equality and climate justice programming for youth in low- and middle-income countries: an analysis of gaps and opportunities , 2022, Environmental Education Research.

[8]  G. Mataveli,et al.  Mining Is a Growing Threat within Indigenous Lands of the Brazilian Amazon , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[9]  A. Aslan,et al.  Analysis of the dynamics of environmental degradation for 18 upper middle-income countries: the role of financial development , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  Jan Hohberger,et al.  Addressing Endogeneity Without Instrumental Variables: An Evaluation of the Gaussian Copula Approach for Management Research , 2022, Journal of Management.

[11]  J. Shimbo,et al.  Unmasking the impunity of illegal deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: a call for enforcement and accountability , 2022, Environmental Research Letters.

[12]  K. Linnerud,et al.  Unpacking democracy: The effects of different democratic qualities on climate change performance over time , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[13]  Hugh Ward,et al.  Carbon Emission Performance and Regime Type: The Role of Inequality , 2022, Global Environmental Politics.

[14]  M. Çetin,et al.  Income inequality and CO2 emissions: nonlinear evidence from Turkey , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[15]  Farfarna Sultana Critical climate justice , 2021, The Geographical Journal.

[16]  C. Ringle,et al.  Revisiting Gaussian copulas to handle endogenous regressors , 2021, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[17]  P. Newell,et al.  Toward transformative climate justice: An emerging research agenda , 2021, WIREs Climate Change.

[18]  Sedat Alataş,et al.  The impact of income inequality on environmental quality: a sectoral-level analysis , 2021, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[19]  E. Mariano,et al.  Guiding the nations through fair low-carbon economy cycles: A climate justice index proposal , 2021, Ecological Indicators.

[20]  Donghyeon Kim,et al.  Carbon dioxide emissions, financial development and political institutions , 2021 .

[21]  P. Mukwaya,et al.  Perceptions and vulnerability to climate change among the urban poor in Kampala City, Uganda , 2021, Regional Environmental Change.

[22]  W. Poortinga,et al.  The role of national affluence, carbon emissions, and democracy in Europeans’ climate perceptions , 2021, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research.

[23]  F. Nicolli,et al.  Inequality, democracy and green technological change , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  J. Schippl,et al.  Using the Capability Approach as a normative perspective on energy justice: Insights from two case studies on digitalisation in the energy sector , 2021 .

[25]  M. Tseng,et al.  Dynamic and causality interrelationships from municipal solid waste recycling to economic growth, carbon emissions and energy efficiency using a novel bootstrapping autoregressive distributed lag , 2021 .

[26]  Ali Acaravci,et al.  The impact of economic, social, and political globalization and democracy on life expectancy in low-income countries: are sustainable development goals contradictory? , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[27]  Human Development Report 2020 , 2020, Human Development Report.

[28]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers , 2020 .

[29]  P. Lujala,et al.  Environmental and land defenders: Global patterns and determinants of repression , 2020 .

[30]  Cosmin-Octavian Cepoi,et al.  INVESTIGATING THE NEXUS BETWEEN FUEL ETHANOL AND CO2 EMISSIONS. A PANEL SMOOTH TRANSITION REGRESSION APPROACH , 2020 .

[31]  S. Erdoğan,et al.  Does democracy help reduce environmental degradation? , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[32]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  How does institutional freedom affect global forest carbon sinks? The analysis of transfer paths , 2020 .

[33]  Abebe Hailemariam,et al.  Carbon emissions, income inequality and economic development , 2020, Empirical Economics.

[34]  Ryan P. Thombs In-and-Beyond State Power: How Political Equality Moderates the Economic Growth-CO2 Emissions Relationship, 1990-2014 , 2020 .

[35]  D. B. Agusdinata,et al.  Economic growth, inequality, and environment nexus: using data mining techniques to unravel archetypes of development trajectories , 2020, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[36]  Katia Campo,et al.  Going Online for Groceries: Drivers of Category-Level Share of Wallet Expansion , 2020, Journal of Retailing.

[37]  J. Barlow,et al.  Fire risk perpetuates poverty and fire use among Amazonian smallholders , 2020 .

[38]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  CO2 emissions, income inequality, and country risk: some international evidence , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[39]  Huiming Zhu,et al.  The direct and indirect effects of democracy on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS countries: evidence from panel quantile regression , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[40]  R. Smyth,et al.  Income inequality and CO2 emissions in the G7, 1870–2014: Evidence from non-parametric modelling , 2020 .

[41]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  The impact of income inequality on consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions at the global level: A partially linear approach. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[42]  Wei Zhou,et al.  The effect of education on determinants of climate change risks , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[43]  Hong Yan,et al.  Will income inequality influence the abatement effect of renewable energy technological innovation on carbon dioxide emissions? , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Amy Lastuka,et al.  The income inequality and carbon emissions trade-off revisited , 2020, Energy Policy.

[45]  B. Chiarini,et al.  The perception of air pollution and noise in urban environments: A subjective indicator across European countries. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[46]  David N. Pellow,et al.  Climate Justice in a Climate Changed World , 2020 .

[47]  Hongbo Duan,et al.  Estimating the threshold interactions between income inequality and carbon emissions. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  J. McGee,et al.  Gender inequality, reproductive justice, and decoupling economic growth and emissions: a panel analysis of the moderating association of gender equality on the relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions , 2020, Environmental Sociology.

[49]  Yehua Li,et al.  Income inequality and CO2 emissions in belt and road initiative countries: the role of democracy , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[50]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method , 2019 .

[51]  J. Roberts,et al.  Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens , 2019, Climatic Change.

[52]  J. McGee,et al.  Renewable energy injustice: The socio-environmental implications of renewable energy consumption , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[53]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Do Environmental Practices Improve Business Performance Even in an Economic Crisis? Extending the Win-Win Perspective , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[54]  J. Hickel The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet , 2019, Sustainable Development.

[55]  L. Zhenmin,et al.  Tackling climate change to accelerate sustainable development , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[56]  M. Giannotti,et al.  The long road to achieving equity: Job accessibility restrictions and overlapping inequalities in the city of São Paulo , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[57]  P. Wells,et al.  An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions , 2019, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[58]  Athanasios Kampas,et al.  Interactions between Democracy and Environmental Quality: Toward a More Nuanced Understanding , 2019, Sustainability.

[59]  Enzo Barberio Mariano,et al.  Climate justice and human development: A systematic literature review , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[60]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Addressing Endogeneity in International Marketing Applications of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2018, Journal of International Marketing.

[61]  Z. Clulow Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation , 2018, Climate Policy.

[62]  Joshua Eastin Climate change and gender equality in developing states , 2018, World Development.

[63]  Esmeralda A. Ramalho,et al.  The effect of income on the energy mix: Are democracies more sustainable? , 2018, Global Environmental Change.

[64]  M. Robinson,et al.  Achieving a climate justice pathway to 1.5 °C , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[65]  Andrew K. Jorgenson,et al.  Inequality, poverty, and the carbon intensity of human well-being in the United States: a sex-specific analysis , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[66]  C. Houle Does economic inequality breed political inequality? , 2018, Democratization.

[67]  D. Lederman,et al.  Inequality and economic growth: the role of initial income , 2018, Journal of Economic Growth.

[68]  Bård Lahn In the light of equity and science: scientific expertise and climate justice after Paris , 2018, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[69]  Michael Mikulewicz Politicizing vulnerability and adaptation: on the need to democratize local responses to climate impacts in developing countries , 2018 .

[70]  Matthew J. Burke,et al.  New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice , 2017 .

[71]  R. Lyster Climate justice, adaptation and the Paris Agreement: a recipe for disasters? , 2017 .

[72]  Rachel Marcus,et al.  Social vulnerability to climate change: a review of concepts and evidence , 2017, Regional Environmental Change.

[73]  W. Adger,et al.  Moral reasoning in adaptation to climate change , 2017 .

[74]  S. Niemeyer,et al.  Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation , 2017 .

[75]  K. Vadlamannati,et al.  Does democracy guarantee (de)forestation? An empirical analysis , 2017 .

[76]  Julia M. Puaschunder Mapping Climate in the Twenty-First Century , 2016 .

[77]  M. Finley-Brook,et al.  Empowering Energy Justice , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[78]  Steve Vanderheiden Climate Justice Beyond International Burden Sharing , 2016 .

[79]  T. Kortetmäki Reframing Climate Justice: A Three-dimensional View on Just Climate Negotiations , 2016 .

[80]  Murat Çetin,et al.  The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries , 2016 .

[81]  E. Neumayer,et al.  Corruption and Climate Change Policies: Do the Bad Old Days Matter? , 2016 .

[82]  Catherine E. LePrevost,et al.  Climate Justice in Rural Southeastern United States: A Review of Climate Change Impacts and Effects on Human Health , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[83]  H. Ertuğrul,et al.  The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey , 2015 .

[84]  Mike S. Schäfer,et al.  Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media , 2015, Climatic Change.

[85]  I. Gough Climate change and sustainable welfare: the centrality of human needs , 2015 .

[86]  R. Mbih,et al.  Climate change, health, and sustainable development in Africa , 2015, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[87]  D. Treisman,et al.  Misperceiving Inequality , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[88]  Katrina Running Towards climate justice: how do the most vulnerable weigh environment-economy trade-offs? , 2015, Social science research.

[89]  Tanja Dreher,et al.  Climate Refugees or Migrants? Contesting Media Frames on Climate Justice in the Pacific , 2015 .

[90]  E. Gibbons Climate change, children's rights, and the pursuit of intergenerational climate justice. , 2014, Health and human rights.

[91]  S. Barrett Subnational Climate Justice? Adaptation Finance Distribution and Climate Vulnerability , 2014 .

[92]  Jungho Baek,et al.  Does income inequality harm the environment?: Empirical evidence from the United States , 2013 .

[93]  E. Neumayer,et al.  Democracy and Climate Change Policies: Is History Important? , 2013 .

[94]  Wouter Peeters,et al.  Putting Sustainability into Sustainable Human Development , 2013 .

[95]  P. Burnell Democracy, democratization and climate change: complex relationships , 2012 .

[96]  Sungho Park,et al.  Handling Endogenous Regressors by Joint Estimation Using Copulas , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[97]  L. Beckman Democracy, national responsibility and climate change justice , 2011 .

[98]  D. Schlosberg Capacity and Capabilities: A Response to the Greenhouse Development Rights Framework , 2009 .

[99]  G. Terry No climate justice without gender justice: an overview of the issues , 2009 .

[100]  F. Comim Climate Injustice and Development: A capability perspective , 2008 .

[101]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  A Theory of Political Transitions , 1999 .

[102]  J. S. Long,et al.  Tests for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[103]  E. Mariano,et al.  A confirmatory factor model for climate justice: Integrating human development and climate actions in low carbon economies , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[104]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[105]  A. Karimu,et al.  Renewable electricity and sustainable development goals in the EU , 2020 .

[106]  Prakash Kashwan Inequality, democracy, and the environment: A cross-national analysis , 2017 .

[107]  Christopher D. Chambers,et al.  Redefine statistical significance , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[108]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward ☆ , 2006 .

[109]  Arab Human Develo ARAB HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2004 , 2004 .