An experimental study of competition between fire ants and Argentine ants in their native range.

An understanding of why introduced species achieve ecological success in novel environments often requires information about the factors that limit the abundance of these taxa in their native ranges. Although numerous recent studies have evaluated the importance of natural enemies in this context, relatively few have examined how ecological success may result from differences in the magnitude of interference competition between communities in the native and introduced ranges of nonnative species. Here we examine how native-range competitive environments may relate to invasion success for two important invasive species, the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) and the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), in a region of native-range sympatry. At two study sites in northern Argentina, we used stable-isotope analysis, a variety of observational approaches, and two different reciprocal removal experiments to test (1) whether S. invicta competes asymmetrically with L. humile (as suggested by the 20th century pattern of replacement in the southeastern United States) and (2) the extent to which these two species achieve behavioral and numerical dominance. Stable-isotope analysis and activity surveys indicated that S. invicta and L. humile are both omnivores and forage during broadly overlapping portions of the diel cycle. Short-term removal experiments at baits revealed no competitive asymmetry between S. invicta and L. humile. Longer-term colony removal experiments illustrated that S. invicta and L. humile experience an approximately equal competitive release upon removal of the other. Our results indicate that neither S. invicta nor L. humile achieves the same degree of behavioral or ecological dominance where they co-occur in native populations as they do in areas where either is common in their introduced range. These results strongly suggest that interspecific competition is an important limiting factor for both S. invicta and L. humile in South America.

[1]  A. Suarez,et al.  Colony-structure variation and interspecific competitive ability in the invasive Argentine ant , 2003, Oecologia.

[2]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  The Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta; Distribution and Habitat in Mato Grosso, Brazil , 1974 .

[3]  J. Grey.  Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental Science , 2008 .

[4]  S. Porter,et al.  Testing for population-level impacts of introduced Pseudacteon tricuspis flies, phorid parasitoids of Solenopsis invicta fire ants , 2005 .

[5]  A. Wild,et al.  Taxonomy and Distribution of the Argentine Ant, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2004 .

[6]  S. Porter,et al.  Invasion of Polygyne Fire Ants Decimates Native Ants and Disrupts Arthropod Community , 1990 .

[7]  M. Korzukhin,et al.  Potential Global Range Expansion of the Invasive Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[8]  E. LeBrun,et al.  Who is the top dog in ant communities? Resources, parasitoids, and multiple competitive hierarchies , 2005, Oecologia.

[9]  E. Aschehoug,et al.  Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. , 2000, Science.

[10]  D. Post.  USING STABLE ISOTOPES TO ESTIMATE TROPHIC POSITION: MODELS, METHODS, AND ASSUMPTIONS , 2002 .

[11]  Distribution, spread, and ecological associations of the introduced ant Pheidole obscurithorax in the southeastern United States , 2004, Journal of insect science.

[12]  R. Mulder,et al.  Distribution and density of polygyne fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Texas. , 1991, Journal of Economic Entomology.

[13]  L. Stone,et al.  The checkerboard score and species distributions , 1990, Oecologia.

[14]  C. Kendall,et al.  Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur , 2003 .

[15]  L. Gilbert,et al.  ASSESSING HOST SPECIFICITY AND FIELD RELEASE POTENTIAL OF FIRE ANT DECAPITATING FLIES ( PHORIDAE : PSEUDACTEON ) , 2004 .

[16]  A. Suarez,et al.  Relationships among native and introduced populations of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) and the source of introduced populations , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[17]  L. Wolfe.  Why Alien Invaders Succeed: Support for the Escape‐from‐Enemy Hypothesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[19]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  Zoogeography of the imported fire ants. , 1974 .

[20]  B. M. Glancey,et al.  Ants of Mobile County, AL, as monitored by bait transects. , 1976 .

[21]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[22]  A. Suarez,et al.  Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Gordon,et al.  Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species , 1996, Oecologia.

[24]  M. Vanderklift,et al.  Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis , 2003, Oecologia.

[25]  D. Feener.  Is the assembly of ant communities mediated by parasitoids , 2000 .

[26]  J. Rasmussen,et al.  Modelling food chain structure and contaminant bioaccumulation using stable nitrogen isotopes , 1994, Nature.

[27]  J. M. Cherrett,et al.  Biological Control by Natural Enemies. , 1976 .

[28]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities , 1997 .

[29]  Williams,et al.  Discovery of thelohania solenopsae from the red imported fire ant, solenopsis invicta, in the united states , 1998, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[30]  D. Tilman.  THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[31]  M. J. Deniro,et al.  Influence of Diet On the Distribtion of Nitrogen Isotopes in Animals , 1978 .

[32]  C. Elton.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1960, Springer US.

[33]  E. Wilson.  VARIATION AND ADAPTATION IN THE IMPORTED FIRE ANT , 1951 .

[34]  A. Suarez,et al.  Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: Insights from Argentine ants. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  G. Vermeij.  When Biotas Meet: Understanding Biotic Interchange , 1991, Science.

[36]  R. Michener,et al.  Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science , 1995 .

[37]  L. Morrison.  Mechanisms of interspecific competition among an invasive and two native fire ants , 2000 .

[38]  D. Holway,et al.  COMPETITIVE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE DISPLACEMENT OF NATIVE ANTS BY THE INVASIVE ARGENTINE ANT , 1999 .

[39]  A. Suarez,et al.  Behavioral and Genetic Differentiation Between Native and Introduced Populations of the Argentine Ant , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[40]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens , 2003, Nature.

[41]  K. Ross,et al.  SYSTEMATICS AND POPULATION GENETICS OF FIRE ANTS (SOLENOPSIS SAEVISSIMA COMPLEX) FROM ARGENTINA , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  H. Fowler,et al.  Intercontinental Differences in the Abundance of Solenopsis Fire Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Escape from Natural Enemies? , 1997 .

[43]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Territory area and colony size in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta , 1995 .

[44]  A. Peterson,et al.  Geographical potential of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile Mayr) in the face of global climate change , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  L. Keller,et al.  Distribution of the Two Social Forms of the Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Native South American Range , 2003 .

[46]  M. Vanderklift,et al.  Sources of variation in consumer-diet delta 15N enrichment: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Oecologia.

[47]  Paul DeBach,et al.  Biological Control by Natural Enemies. , 1975 .

[48]  A. Dobson,et al.  Introduced species and their missing parasites , 2003, Nature.

[49]  De,et al.  Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review. , 1998, Animal behaviour.

[50]  A. Andersen.  Regulation of "Momentary" Diversity by Dominant Species in Exceptionally Rich Ant Communities of the Australian Seasonal Tropics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[51]  N. Gotelli.  Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns , 2000 .

[52]  L. Keller,et al.  Social evolution in a new environment: the case of introduced fire ants. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  A. Suarez,et al.  Measuring the trophic ecology of ants using stable isotopes , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.

[54]  H. Fowler,et al.  FIRE ANT MOUND DENSITIES IN THE UNITED-STATES AND BRAZIL (HYMENOPTERA, FORMICIDAE) , 1992 .

[55]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Ecological interactions of Pseudacteon parasitoids and Solenopsis ant hosts: environmental correlates of activity and effects on competitive hierarchies , 2000 .

[56]  E. Vargo,et al.  The diminutive supercolony: the Argentine ants of the southeastern United States , 2004, Molecular ecology.