Individual differences in fifth graders' reading and language predict their comprehension monitoring development: An eye-movement study.

In this study, we investigated fifth-graders' (n=52) fall literacy, academic language, and motivation, and how these skills predicted fall and spring comprehension monitoring on an eye movement task. Comprehension monitoring was defined as the identification and repair of misunderstandings when reading text. In the eye movement task, children read two sentences; the second included either a plausible or implausible word in the context of the first sentence. Stronger readers had shorter reading times overall suggesting faster processing of text. Generally fifth-graders reacted to the implausible word (i.e., longer gaze duration on the implausible v. the plausible word, which reflects lexical access). Students with stronger academic language, compared to those with weaker academic language, generally spent more time re-reading the implausible target compared to the plausible target. This difference increased from fall to spring. Results support the centrality of academic language for meaning integration, setting standards of coherence, and utilizing comprehension repair strategies.

[1]  Paulina A. Kulesz,et al.  The Contribution of Attentional Control and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension and Decoding , 2014, Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading.

[2]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Comprehension Tools for Teachers: Reading for Understanding from Prekindergarten Through Fourth Grade , 2014, Educational psychology review.

[3]  F. Morrison,et al.  Behavioral Engagement and Reading Achievement in Elementary-School-Age Children: A Longitudinal Cross-Lagged Analysis. , 2014 .

[4]  R. Radach,et al.  Monitoring Local Comprehension Monitoring in Sentence Reading , 2013 .

[5]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  S. Neuman,et al.  Knowledge Development in Early Childhood: Sources of Learning and Classroom Implications. , 2012 .

[8]  Siliang Tang,et al.  EyeMap: a software system for visualizing and analyzing eye movement data in reading , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[9]  Heejin Kim,et al.  The Simple View of Reading , 2012 .

[10]  Kate Cain,et al.  The Precursors of Reading Ability in Young Readers: Evidence From a Four-Year Longitudinal Study , 2012 .

[11]  Hazel I. Blythe,et al.  Children’s eye movements during reading , 2011 .

[12]  Menno van der Schoot,et al.  How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders , 2011, Reading and Writing.

[13]  Jessica R. Toste,et al.  Effective Classroom Instruction: Implications of Child Characteristics by Reading Instruction Interactions on First Graders’ Word Reading Achievement , 2011, Journal of research on educational effectiveness.

[14]  Sarah Logan,et al.  The Importance of Intrinsic Motivation for High and Low Ability Readers' Reading Comprehension Performance. , 2011 .

[15]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Vocabulary Growth and Reading Development across the Elementary School Years , 2011 .

[16]  C. Snow,et al.  Academic Language and the Challenge of Reading for Learning About Science , 2010, Science.

[17]  M. Vauras,et al.  Tracking On-Line Metacognition: Monitoring and Regulating Comprehension in Reading , 2010 .

[18]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Impacts of Comprehensive Reading Instruction on Diverse Outcomes of Low- and High-Achieving Readers , 2009, Journal of learning disabilities.

[19]  Shayne B. Piasta,et al.  The ISI Classroom Observation System: Examining the Literacy Instruction Provided to Individual Students , 2009 .

[20]  M. Schoot,et al.  Lexical ambiguity resolution in good and poor comprehenders: An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in primary school children , 2009 .

[21]  Barbara J. Wendling,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. , 2009 .

[22]  Richard K. Wagner,et al.  Beyond decoding : the behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension , 2009 .

[23]  Barry Fishman,et al.  Individualizing student instruction precisely: effects of Child x Instruction interactions on first graders' literacy development. , 2009, Child development.

[24]  David N. Rapp,et al.  Higher-Order Comprehension Processes in Struggling Readers: A Perspective for Research and Intervention , 2007 .

[25]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading , 2006 .

[26]  M. Mazzocco,et al.  Development of the Metacognitive Skills of Prediction and Evaluation in Children With or Without Math Disability. , 2006, Learning disabilities research & practice : a publication of the Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children.

[27]  Robert Savage,et al.  Reading Comprehension Is Not Always the Product of Nonsense Word Decoding and Linguistic Comprehension: Evidence From Teenagers Who Are Extremely Poor Readers , 2006 .

[28]  J. Oakhill,et al.  Levels of Comprehension Monitoring and Working Memory in Good and Poor Comprehenders , 2005 .

[29]  Lee Branum-Martin,et al.  Literacy as a Unidimensional Multilevel Construct: Validation, Sources of Influence, and Implications in a Longitudinal Study in Grades 1 to 4 , 2005 .

[30]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  J. Oakhill,et al.  Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. , 2004 .

[32]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research , 2004 .

[33]  P. Pintrich A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[34]  David K. Dickinson,et al.  The Comprehensive Language Approach to Early Literacy: The Interrelationships Among Vocabulary, Phonological Sensitivity, and Print Knowledge Among Preschool-Aged Children , 2003 .

[35]  G. Whitehurst,et al.  Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: evidence from a longitudinal structural model. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[36]  J. Torgesen The Prevention of Reading Difficulties , 2002 .

[37]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST HOW PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE INFORMS THE TEACHING OF READING , 2022 .

[38]  D. Langenberg Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[39]  Emily Anderson,et al.  Influences of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction on Strategy Use and Conceptual Learning from Text , 1999, The Elementary School Journal.

[40]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Comprehension and Decoding: Patterns of Association in Children With Reading Difficulties , 1999 .

[41]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[43]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Preventing reading difficulties in young children , 1998 .

[44]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Relations of Children's Motivation for Reading to the Amount and Breadth of Their Reading. , 1997 .

[45]  Murray D. Smith,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications , 1996 .

[46]  M. Vauras,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring and the Level of Comprehension in High- and Low-Achieving Primary School Children's Reading. , 1995 .

[47]  Joseph Fitzpatrick,et al.  Reading as Understanding , 1994 .

[48]  James F. Baumann,et al.  Effect of Think-Aloud Instruction on Elementary Students' Comprehension Monitoring Abilities , 1992 .

[49]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[50]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. , 1992 .

[51]  J. Meyers,et al.  Think-Aloud Protocol Analysis: An Investigation of Reading Comprehension Strategies in Fourth-and Fifth-Grade Students , 1990 .

[52]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  Children's Ability to Use Three Standards to Evaluate Their Comprehension of Text. , 1989 .

[53]  Shirley A. Wagoner Comprehension Monitoring: What It Is and What We Know About It. , 1983 .

[54]  Ron Reis,et al.  Monitoring and Resolving Comprehension Obstacles: An Investigation of Spontaneous Text Lookbacks among Upper-Grade Good and Poor Comprehenders. , 1981 .

[55]  Jeanne Sternlicht Chall,et al.  Learning to Read: The Great Debate , 1967 .