The speed-accuracy trade-off in industry

Abstract In the class of resource-limited tasks, performance speed and accuracy are expected to be inversely related. However at the systems level, interventions which improve quality can provide benefits in throughput. Examining the speed-accuracy operating characteristic (SAOC) of industrial tasks shows that the apparent conflict between these two bodies of data is due to different types of intervention. A methodology for the systematic consideration of the speed-accuracy trade-off (SATO) is proposed, and its application to the tasks in aircraft structural inspection is developed as an example.

[1]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide To Task Analysis: The Task Analysis Working Group , 1992 .

[2]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[3]  W H Teichner,et al.  Visual search for simple targets. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Colin G. Drury.  Errors in Aviation Maintenance: Taxonomy and Control , 1991 .

[5]  C G Drury,et al.  Inspection of Sheet Materials — Model and Data , 1975, Human factors.

[6]  John W. Senders,et al.  Human Error: Cause, Prediction, and Reduction , 1991 .

[7]  D. Norman.  Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[8]  Ian Overington,et al.  Vision and Acquisition , 1976 .

[9]  P. Fitts.  Cognitive aspects of information processing. 3. Set for speed versus accuracy. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  C G Drury,et al.  The Influence of the Reflective-Impulsive Cognitive Style on Visual Inspection , 1984, Human factors.

[11]  C G Drury,et al.  Movements with lateral constraint. , 1971, Ergonomics.

[12]  William T. Shepherd.  Human Factors in the Maintenance and Inspection of Aircraft , 1990 .

[13]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[14]  J D Gould,et al.  Studies of Visual Inspection. , 1973, Ergonomics.

[15]  W. E. Hick.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[16]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction , 1986 .

[17]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[18]  R. Pew,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Reaction Time: Effect of Discrete Criterion Times , 1968 .

[19]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal Detection as a Function of Signal Intensity and Duration , 1957 .

[20]  C G Drury,et al.  Human factors limitations in fork-lift truck performance. , 1974, Ergonomics.

[21]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[23]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  THE OPTIMUM SPEED OF VISUAL INSPECTION USING A RANDOM SEARCH STRATEGY , 1992 .

[24]  Alan D. Swain,et al.  An Error-Cause Removal Program for Industry , 1973 .

[25]  C G Drury,et al.  Predicting Search Performance for Multiple Targets , 1980, Human factors.

[26]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Human Performance in Sampling Inspection , 1979 .

[27]  Neal Q. Herrick,et al.  Work in America , 1980 .

[28]  N. Rashevsky.  Mathematical biophysics of automobile driving , 1959 .

[29]  R. Pew.  The speed-accuracy operating characteristic , 1969 .

[30]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[31]  Richard G. Swensson,et al.  The elusive tradeoff: Speed vs accuracy in visual discrimination tasks , 1972 .

[32]  E. Hoffmann,et al.  Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[33]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Task Analysis of Aircraft Inspection Activities: Methods and Findings , 1990 .

[34]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Ergonomics practice in manufacturing , 1991 .