The Influence of Different Representations on Solving Concentration Problems at Elementary School

This study investigated the students’ learning process of the concept of concentration at the elementary school level in Taiwan. The influence of different representational types on the process of proportional reasoning was also explored. The participants included nineteen third-grade and eighteen fifth-grade students. Eye-tracking technology was used in conducting the experiment. The materials were adapted from Noelting’s (1980a) “orange juice test” experiment. All problems on concentration included three stages (the intuitive, the concrete operational, and the formal operational), and each problem was displayed in iconic and symbolic representations. The data were collected through eye-tracking technology and post-test interviews. The results showed that the representational types influenced students’ solving of concentration problems. Furthermore, the data on eye movement indicated that students used different strategies or rules to solve concentration problems at the different stages of the problems with different representational types. This study is intended to contribute to the understanding of elementary school students’ problem-solving strategies and the usability of eye-tracking technology in related studies.

[1]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .

[2]  R. Kozma.  The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .

[3]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice , 2003, Springer London.

[4]  L. Steffe,et al.  The Development of the Concepts of Ratio and Fraction in the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Years of the Elementary School. , 1968 .

[5]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Eye-Tracking Students' Attention to PowerPoint Photographs in a Science Education Setting , 2005 .

[6]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[7]  N. Mackworth,et al.  The gaze selects informative details within pictures , 1967 .

[8]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Visual Representations of DNA Replication: Middle Grades Students’ Perceptions and Interpretations , 2005 .

[9]  R. Pintó,et al.  Students' reading of innovative images of energy at secondary school level , 2002 .

[10]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Child's Conception of Number , 1953 .

[11]  R. Stavy,et al.  1 – U-Shaped Behavioral Growth in Ratio Comparisons1 , 1982 .

[12]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth of Logical Thinking , 1959 .

[13]  Laura Chamberlain.  Eye Tracking Methodology; Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[14]  J. Antes,et al.  The Effect of Experience on Reading Topographic Relief Information: Analyses of Performance and Eye Movements , 1985 .

[15]  J. Piaget.  The Child's Conception of Number , 1953 .

[16]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[17]  G. Noelting,et al.  The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part II—problem-structure at successive stages; problem-solving strategies and the mechanism of adaptive restructuring , 1980 .

[18]  Jan van der Meij,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations , 1998 .

[19]  Pinhas Yoeli.  The Making Of Intervisibility Maps With Computer And Plotter , 1985 .

[20]  Tina Seufert.  Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[21]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[22]  G. Noelting.  The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part I — Differentiation of stages , 1980 .

[23]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  How Students Mis/Understand Science and Mathematics: Intuitive Rules (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 2000 .

[24]  J. Mathewson.  Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators , 1999 .

[25]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[26]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Eye Movements Do Not Reflect Retrieval Processes , 2004, Psychological science.

[27]  Maria Bannert,et al.  16. Toward and integrative view of text and picture comprehension: visualization effects on the construction of mental models , 2002 .

[28]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Comprehension of Graphics , 2011 .

[29]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends , 2003 .

[30]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Habituation of the visual orienting response in young children1, 2 , 1970 .