Spatial Ability: A Neglected Dimension In Talent Searches For Intellectually Precocious Youth

Students identified by talent search programs were studied to determine whether spatial ability could uncover math-science promise. In Phase 1, interests and values of intellectually talented adolescents (617 boys, 443 girls) were compared with those of top math-science graduate students (368 men, 346 women) as a function of their standing on spatial visualization to assess their potential fit with math-science careers. In Phase 2, 5-year longitudinal analyses revealed that spatial ability coalesces with a constellation of personal preferences indicative of fit for pursuing scientific careers and adds incremental validity beyond preferences in predicting math-science criteria. In Phase 3, data from participants with Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores were analyzed longitudinally, and a salient math-science constellation again emerged (with which spatial ability and SAT-Math were consistently positively correlated and SAT-Verbal was negatively correlated). Results across the 3 phases triangulate to suggest that adding spatial ability to talent search identification procedures (currently restricted to mathematical and verbal ability) could uncover a neglected pool of math-science talent and holds promise for refining our understanding of intellectually talented youth.

[1]  L. Hudson.  Frames of Mind , 1970 .

[2]  Miriam Feigenbaum,et al.  Evaluating the Appropriateness of the SAT I: Reasoning Test for Seventh and Eighth Graders , 2001 .

[3]  J. Stanley.  In the Beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY). , 1996 .

[4]  R. Linn.  Educational measurement, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[5]  Eugene W. Stark,et al.  About Intellectual Talent , 1978 .

[6]  Maurice M. Tatsuoka,et al.  Multivariate Statistics for Personnel Classification. , 1968 .

[7]  David Lubinski,et al.  Men and Women at Promise for Scientific Excellence: Similarity Not Dissimilarity , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  L. Hedges,et al.  Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. , 1995, Science.

[9]  D. Geary.  Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences , 1998 .

[10]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  A. Anastasi.  Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Mijung Yoon,et al.  The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[15]  Yu Qing.  Sex Differences in Mental Rotation , 2008 .

[16]  L. H. Lofquist,et al.  Essentials of Person-Environment-Correspondence Counseling , 1991 .

[17]  P. Meehl.  Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It , 1990 .

[18]  R. Dawis,et al.  A psychological theory of work adjustment : an individual-differences model and its applications , 1984 .

[19]  S. Assouline,et al.  Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development , 1994 .

[20]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Contrasting Intellectual Patterns Predict Creativity in the Arts and Sciences , 2007, Psychological science.

[21]  I. Macfarlane Smith,et al.  Spatial ability : its educational and social significance , 1965 .

[22]  [Vocational counseling]. , 1959, Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie en haar grensgebieden.

[23]  David Lubinski,et al.  Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability at Age 13: Their Status 20 Years Later , 2000, Psychological science.

[24]  D. Lykken.  Statistical significance in psychological research. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  J. Stanley,et al.  Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts. , 1983, Science.

[26]  David Lubinski,et al.  Tracking Exceptional Human Capital Over Two Decades , 2006, Psychological science.

[27]  Joan P. Avis.  Counseling , 1982 .

[28]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  David F. Lohman,et al.  Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. , 1988 .

[30]  Ellen B. Mandinach,et al.  Remaking the Concept of Aptitude: Extending the Legacy of Richard E. Snow , 2001 .

[31]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Kurt A. Heller,et al.  International handbook of giftedness and talent , 2002 .

[33]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[34]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Advanced Placement’s Role in Developing Exceptional Human Capital , 2004 .

[35]  L. Sechrest.  Incremental Validity : a Recommendation , 1963 .

[36]  R. Dawis.  1999 Leona Tyler Award: Rene V. Dawis , 2001 .

[37]  Calyampudi R. Rao,et al.  Tests of significance in multivariate analysis. , 1948, Biometrika.

[38]  D. Halpern.  Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[39]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[40]  Sherwin Bailey,et al.  The two cultures: and a second look , 1964 .

[41]  D. Lubinski.  Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) "'General intelligence,' objectively determined and measured". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  G. A. Davis,et al.  Handbook of Gifted Education , 1991 .

[43]  Ray Bert,et al.  Book Review: \IThe World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century\N by Thomas L. Friedman. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005 , 2006 .

[44]  Janet L. Rovenpor,et al.  The Study of Values: Construction of the fourth edition , 2003 .

[45]  J. Stanley,et al.  Intellectual talent : psychometric and social issues , 1996 .

[46]  L. Gottfredson.  The Challenge and Promise of Cognitive Career Assessment , 2003 .

[47]  D. Lohman,et al.  Gifted Today but Not Tomorrow? Longitudinal Changes in Ability and Achievement during Elementary School , 2006 .

[48]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  John Heywood,et al.  Assessment in higher education , 1978 .

[50]  P. Ackerman.  A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge , 1996 .

[51]  D Lubinski,et al.  Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: "sinking shafts at a few critical points". , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[52]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Validity of Assessing Educational-Vocational Preference Dimensions Among Intellectually Talented 13-Year-Olds , 2001 .

[53]  Linda E. Brody,et al.  Effects of High School Coursework and Time on SAT Scores. , 1990 .

[54]  R. Dawes.  Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[55]  J. C. Flanagan.  Design for a Study of American Youth. , 1962 .

[56]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[57]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. , 2002 .

[58]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[59]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented Young Adolescents: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study. , 2001 .

[60]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Intelligence, Mind, and Reasoning Structure and Development , 1994 .

[61]  R. Snow,et al.  Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. , 1989 .

[62]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Assessing similarity between profiles. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[63]  P. Hallinan.  Teaching the gifted child (4th Ed.) J.J. Gallagher & S.A. Gallagher Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon; 1994; pp. xi+ 486; $55.95. , 1994, Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools.

[64]  J. Stanley,et al.  Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science , 1972 .

[65]  R. Dawis.  Vocational interests, values, and preferences. , 1991 .

[66]  D. Kimura.  Sex and cognition , 1999 .

[67]  D. Jackson,et al.  Individual differences in affective and conative functions. , 1996 .

[68]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  Use of Discriminant Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research , 1987 .

[69]  Camilla Persson Benbow,et al.  Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? , 1992 .

[70]  Susan X. Day,et al.  Universality of Vocational Interest Structure among Racial and Ethnic Minorities. , 1998 .

[71]  L M Branscomb,et al.  Women in science. , 1979, Science.

[72]  J. Stanley,et al.  INEQUITY IN EQUITY: How "Equity" Can Lead to Inequity for High-Potential Students , 1996 .

[73]  C. Benbow.  Some of the pathological assumptions in the sciences of gender , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[74]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Validity of Assessing Educational-Vocational Preference Dimensions among Intellectually Talented 13-Year-Olds. , 1998 .

[75]  R. Cattell.  Personality and motivation structure and measurement , 1958 .

[76]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Top 1 in 10,000: a 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[77]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: "It was never there and already it's vanishing." , 1996 .

[78]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Stability of vocational interests among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: a 15-year longitudinal study. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[79]  Helping students learn only what they don't already know. , 2000 .

[80]  P. Meehl.  Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. , 1978 .

[81]  S. Whitely.  Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. , 1983 .

[82]  L G Humphreys,et al.  Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[83]  J. J. Gallagher,et al.  Teaching the gifted child , 1975 .

[84]  David Lubinski,et al.  Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study. , 2005 .

[85]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  The Strong Ring: A Basic Interest Model of Occupational Structure , 2004 .

[86]  Michael C. Pyryt.  Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[87]  C. Spearman.  General intelligence Objectively Determined and Measured , 1904 .

[88]  J. Wallace.  Spatially Gifted, Verbally Inconvenienced , 1994 .

[89]  S. Cole,et al.  Women in science. , 1994, Science.

[90]  Richard E. Snow,et al.  A Person-Situation Interaction Theory of Intelligence in Outline , 1994 .

[91]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. Third Edition. , 2000 .

[92]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Blending Promise with Passion: Best Practices for Counseling Intellectually Talented Youth. , 2005 .

[93]  S. Assouline,et al.  A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America's Brightest Students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Volume 2. , 2004 .

[94]  D. Lubinski,et al.  States of excellence. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[95]  R. Sternberg.  Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[96]  J. L. Holland,et al.  Making vocational choices : a theory of vocational personalities and work environments , 1984 .

[97]  P. Meehl,et al.  Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. , 1996 .

[98]  D. Lohman.  The Role of Nonverbal Ability Tests in Identifying Academically Gifted Students: An Aptitude Perspective , 2005 .

[99]  L. Humphreys,et al.  Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial and mathematical ability. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[100]  Linda S. Gottfredson,et al.  Occupational Aptitude Patterns Map: Development and implications for a theory of job aptitude requirements☆ , 1986 .

[101]  R. Dawis.  The Individual Differences Tradition in Counseling Psychology. , 1992 .

[102]  David C. Geary,et al.  The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence , 2004 .

[103]  Susan X. Day,et al.  The Structure of Vocational Interests for Diverse Racial-Ethnic Groups , 1998 .

[104]  Carol L. Gohm,et al.  Underachievement Among Spatially Gifted Students , 1998 .

[105]  Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: a longitudinal analysis using project TALENT data. , 1990, The Journal of applied psychology.

[106]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity to abilities: A discriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a 10-year interval. , 1999 .

[107]  R. Dawis.  Vocational psychology, vocational adjustment, and the workforce: Some familiar and unanticipated consequences. , 1996 .

[108]  M. S. Masters,et al.  The gender difference on the Mental Rotations test is not due to performance factors , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[109]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[110]  How people make their own environments: Implications for parents and policy makers. , 1996 .

[111]  S. Scarr,et al.  How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype greater than environment effects. , 1983, Child development.

[112]  J. Galen Buckwalter,et al.  Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[113]  T. Tracey,et al.  Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures , 1996 .

[114]  H. Jones,et al.  Frames of Mind , 1969, Mental Health.

[115]  Paul A. Gore,et al.  An Evaluation of Interest Congruence Indices: Distribution Characteristics and Measurement Properties. , 1994 .

[116]  John L. Holland,et al.  Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. , 1996 .

[117]  David Lubinski,et al.  A 20-year stability analysis of the study of values for intellectually gifted individuals from adolescence to adulthood. , 1996 .